Identify Goal
Define Problem
Define Problem
Gather Data
Define Causes
Identify Options
Clarify Problem
Generate Ideas
Evaluate Options
Generate Ideas
Choose the Best Solution
Implement Solution
Select Solution
Take Action
MacLeod offers her own problem solving procedure, which echoes the above steps:
“1. Recognize the Problem: State what you see. Sometimes the problem is covert. 2. Identify: Get the facts — What exactly happened? What is the issue? 3. and 4. Explore and Connect: Dig deeper and encourage group members to relate their similar experiences. Now you're getting more into the feelings and background [of the situation], not just the facts. 5. Possible Solutions: Consider and brainstorm ideas for resolution. 6. Implement: Choose a solution and try it out — this could be role play and/or a discussion of how the solution would be put in place. 7. Evaluate: Revisit to see if the solution was successful or not.”
Many of these problem solving techniques can be used in concert with one another, or multiple can be appropriate for any given problem. It’s less about facilitating a perfect CPS session, and more about encouraging team members to continually think outside the box and push beyond personal boundaries that inhibit their innovative thinking. So, try out several methods, find those that resonate best with your team, and continue adopting new techniques and adapting your processes along the way.
Empower your people to go above and beyond with a flexible platform designed to match the needs of your team — and adapt as those needs change.
The Smartsheet platform makes it easy to plan, capture, manage, and report on work from anywhere, helping your team be more effective and get more done. Report on key metrics and get real-time visibility into work as it happens with roll-up reports, dashboards, and automated workflows built to keep your team connected and informed.
When teams have clarity into the work getting done, there’s no telling how much more they can accomplish in the same amount of time. Try Smartsheet for free, today.
How it works
Transform your enterprise with the scalable mindsets, skills, & behavior change that drive performance.
Explore how BetterUp connects to your core business systems.
We pair AI with the latest in human-centered coaching to drive powerful, lasting learning and behavior change.
Build leaders that accelerate team performance and engagement.
Unlock performance potential at scale with AI-powered curated growth journeys.
Build resilience, well-being and agility to drive performance across your entire enterprise.
Transform your business, starting with your sales leaders.
Unlock business impact from the top with executive coaching.
Foster a culture of inclusion and belonging.
Accelerate the performance and potential of your agencies and employees.
See how innovative organizations use BetterUp to build a thriving workforce.
Discover how BetterUp measurably impacts key business outcomes for organizations like yours.
Daring Leadership Institute: a groundbreaking partnership that amplifies Brené Brown's empirically based, courage-building curriculum with BetterUp’s human transformation platform.
Learn how 1:1 coaching works, who its for, and if it's right for you.
Accelerate your personal and professional growth with the expert guidance of a BetterUp Coach.
Types of Coaching
Navigate career transitions, accelerate your professional growth, and achieve your career goals with expert coaching.
Enhance your communication skills for better personal and professional relationships, with tailored coaching that focuses on your needs.
Find balance, resilience, and well-being in all areas of your life with holistic coaching designed to empower you.
Discover your perfect match : Take our 5-minute assessment and let us pair you with one of our top Coaches tailored just for you.
Find your coach
Research, expert insights, and resources to develop courageous leaders within your organization.
Best practices, research, and tools to fuel individual and business growth.
View on-demand BetterUp events and learn about upcoming live discussions.
The latest insights and ideas for building a high-performing workplace.
The online magazine that helps you understand tomorrow's workforce trends, today.
Innovative research featured in peer-reviewed journals, press, and more.
Founded in 2022 to deepen the understanding of the intersection of well-being, purpose, and performance
We're on a mission to help everyone live with clarity, purpose, and passion.
Join us and create impactful change.
Read the buzz about BetterUp.
Meet the leadership that's passionate about empowering your workforce.
For Business
For Individuals
Jump to section
What are the 5 steps to problem-solving, 10 effective problem-solving strategies, what skills do efficient problem solvers have, how to improve your problem-solving skills.
Problems come in all shapes and sizes — from workplace conflict to budget cuts.
Creative problem-solving is one of the most in-demand skills in all roles and industries. It can boost an organization’s human capital and give it a competitive edge.
Problem-solving strategies are ways of approaching problems that can help you look beyond the obvious answers and find the best solution to your problem .
Let’s take a look at a five-step problem-solving process and how to combine it with proven problem-solving strategies. This will give you the tools and skills to solve even your most complex problems.
Good problem-solving is an essential part of the decision-making process . To see what a problem-solving process might look like in real life, let’s take a common problem for SaaS brands — decreasing customer churn rates.
To solve this problem, the company must first identify it. In this case, the problem is that the churn rate is too high.
Next, they need to identify the root causes of the problem. This could be anything from their customer service experience to their email marketing campaigns. If there are several problems, they will need a separate problem-solving process for each one.
Let’s say the problem is with email marketing — they’re not nurturing existing customers. Now that they’ve identified the problem, they can start using problem-solving strategies to look for solutions.
This might look like coming up with special offers, discounts, or bonuses for existing customers. They need to find ways to remind them to use their products and services while providing added value. This will encourage customers to keep paying their monthly subscriptions.
They might also want to add incentives, such as access to a premium service at no extra cost after 12 months of membership. They could publish blog posts that help their customers solve common problems and share them as an email newsletter.
The company should set targets and a time frame in which to achieve them. This will allow leaders to measure progress and identify which actions yield the best results.
Perhaps you’ve got a problem you need to tackle. Or maybe you want to be prepared the next time one arises. Either way, it’s a good idea to get familiar with the five steps of problem-solving.
Use this step-by-step problem-solving method with the strategies in the following section to find possible solutions to your problem.
The first step is to know which problem you need to solve. Then, you need to find the root cause of the problem.
The best course of action is to gather as much data as possible, speak to the people involved, and separate facts from opinions.
Once this is done, formulate a statement that describes the problem. Use rational persuasion to make sure your team agrees .
Identifying the problem allows you to see which steps need to be taken to solve it.
First, break the problem down into achievable blocks. Then, use strategic planning to set a time frame in which to solve the problem and establish a timeline for the completion of each stage.
At this stage, the aim isn’t to evaluate possible solutions but to generate as many ideas as possible.
Encourage your team to use creative thinking and be patient — the best solution may not be the first or most obvious one.
Use one or more of the different strategies in the following section to help come up with solutions — the more creative, the better.
Once you’ve generated potential solutions, narrow them down to a shortlist. Then, evaluate the options on your shortlist.
There are usually many factors to consider. So when evaluating a solution, ask yourself the following questions:
Once you’ve identified your solution and got buy-in from your team, it’s time to implement it.
But the work doesn’t stop there. You need to monitor your solution to see whether it actually solves your problem.
Request regular feedback from the team members involved and have a monitoring and evaluation plan in place to measure progress.
If the solution doesn’t achieve your desired results, start this step-by-step process again.
There are many different ways to approach problem-solving. Each is suitable for different types of problems.
The most appropriate problem-solving techniques will depend on your specific problem. You may need to experiment with several strategies before you find a workable solution.
Here are 10 effective problem-solving strategies for you to try:
Let’s break each of these down.
It might seem obvious, but if you’ve faced similar problems in the past, look back to what worked then. See if any of the solutions could apply to your current situation and, if so, replicate them.
The more people you enlist to help solve the problem, the more potential solutions you can come up with.
Use different brainstorming techniques to workshop potential solutions with your team. They’ll likely bring something you haven’t thought of to the table.
Working backward is a way to reverse engineer your problem. Imagine your problem has been solved, and make that the starting point.
Then, retrace your steps back to where you are now. This can help you see which course of action may be most effective.
This is a method that poses six questions based on Rudyard Kipling’s poem, “ I Keep Six Honest Serving Men .”
Answering these questions can help you identify possible solutions.
Sometimes it can be difficult to visualize all the components and moving parts of a problem and its solution. Drawing a diagram can help.
This technique is particularly helpful for solving process-related problems. For example, a product development team might want to decrease the time they take to fix bugs and create new iterations. Drawing the processes involved can help you see where improvements can be made.
A trial-and-error approach can be useful when you have several possible solutions and want to test them to see which one works best.
Finding the best solution to a problem is a process. Remember to take breaks and get enough rest . Sometimes, a walk around the block can bring inspiration, but you should sleep on it if possible.
A good night’s sleep helps us find creative solutions to problems. This is because when you sleep, your brain sorts through the day’s events and stores them as memories. This enables you to process your ideas at a subconscious level.
If possible, give yourself a few days to develop and analyze possible solutions. You may find you have greater clarity after sleeping on it. Your mind will also be fresh, so you’ll be able to make better decisions.
Getting input from a group of people can help you find solutions you may not have thought of on your own.
For solo entrepreneurs or freelancers, this might look like hiring a coach or mentor or joining a mastermind group.
For leaders , it might be consulting other members of the leadership team or working with a business coach .
It’s important to recognize you might not have all the skills, experience, or knowledge necessary to find a solution alone.
The Pareto principle — also known as the 80/20 rule — can help you identify possible root causes and potential solutions for your problems.
Although it’s not a mathematical law, it’s a principle found throughout many aspects of business and life. For example, 20% of the sales reps in a company might close 80% of the sales.
You may be able to narrow down the causes of your problem by applying the Pareto principle. This can also help you identify the most appropriate solutions.
Every situation is different, and the same solutions might not always work. But by keeping a record of successful problem-solving strategies, you can build up a solutions toolkit.
These solutions may be applicable to future problems. Even if not, they may save you some of the time and work needed to come up with a new solution.
Improving problem-solving skills is essential for professional development — both yours and your team’s. Here are some of the key skills of effective problem solvers:
And they see problems as opportunities. Everyone is born with problem-solving skills. But accessing these abilities depends on how we view problems. Effective problem-solvers see problems as opportunities to learn and improve.
Ready to work on your problem-solving abilities? Get started with these seven tips.
One of the best ways to improve your problem-solving skills is to learn from experts. Consider enrolling in organizational training , shadowing a mentor , or working with a coach .
Practice using your new problem-solving skills by applying them to smaller problems you might encounter in your daily life.
Alternatively, imagine problematic scenarios that might arise at work and use problem-solving strategies to find hypothetical solutions.
Often, the first solution you think of to solve a problem isn’t the most appropriate or effective.
Instead of thinking on the spot, give yourself time and use one or more of the problem-solving strategies above to activate your creative thinking.
Receiving feedback is always important for learning and growth. Your perception of your problem-solving skills may be different from that of your colleagues. They can provide insights that help you improve.
There are entire books written about problem-solving methodologies if you want to take a deep dive into the subject.
We recommend starting with “ Fixed — How to Perfect the Fine Art of Problem Solving ” by Amy E. Herman.
Tried-and-tested problem-solving techniques can be useful. However, they don’t teach you how to innovate and develop your own problem-solving approaches.
Sometimes, an unconventional approach can lead to the development of a brilliant new idea or strategy. So don’t be afraid to suggest your most “out there” ideas.
Do you have competitors who have already solved the problem you’re facing? Look at what they did, and work backward to solve your own problem.
For example, Netflix started in the 1990s as a DVD mail-rental company. Its main competitor at the time was Blockbuster.
But when streaming became the norm in the early 2000s, both companies faced a crisis. Netflix innovated, unveiling its streaming service in 2007.
If Blockbuster had followed Netflix’s example, it might have survived. Instead, it declared bankruptcy in 2010.
When facing a problem, it’s worth taking the time to find the right solution.
Otherwise, we risk either running away from our problems or headlong into solutions. When we do this, we might miss out on other, better options.
Use the problem-solving strategies outlined above to find innovative solutions to your business’ most perplexing problems.
If you’re ready to take problem-solving to the next level, request a demo with BetterUp . Our expert coaches specialize in helping teams develop and implement strategies that work.
Understand Yourself Better:
Big 5 Personality Test
Elizabeth Perry is a Coach Community Manager at BetterUp. She uses strategic engagement strategies to cultivate a learning community across a global network of Coaches through in-person and virtual experiences, technology-enabled platforms, and strategic coaching industry partnerships. With over 3 years of coaching experience and a certification in transformative leadership and life coaching from Sofia University, Elizabeth leverages transpersonal psychology expertise to help coaches and clients gain awareness of their behavioral and thought patterns, discover their purpose and passions, and elevate their potential. She is a lifelong student of psychology, personal growth, and human potential as well as an ICF-certified ACC transpersonal life and leadership Coach.
5 problem-solving questions to prepare you for your next interview, 31 examples of problem solving performance review phrases, what are metacognitive skills examples in everyday life, what is lateral thinking 7 techniques to encourage creative ideas, leadership activities that encourage employee engagement, learn what process mapping is and how to create one (+ examples), how much do distractions cost 8 effects of lack of focus, 3 problem statement examples and steps to write your own, the pareto principle: how the 80/20 rule can help you do more with less, thinking outside the box: 8 ways to become a creative problem solver, 10 examples of principles that can guide your approach to work, contingency planning: 4 steps to prepare for the unexpected, stay connected with betterup, get our newsletter, event invites, plus product insights and research..
3100 E 5th Street, Suite 350 Austin, TX 78702
Struggling to overcome challenges in your life? We all face problems, big and small, on a regular basis.
So how do you tackle them effectively? What are some key problem-solving strategies and skills that can guide you?
Effective problem-solving requires breaking issues down logically, generating solutions creatively, weighing choices critically, and adapting plans flexibly based on outcomes. Useful strategies range from leveraging past solutions that have worked to visualizing problems through diagrams. Core skills include analytical abilities, innovative thinking, and collaboration.
Want to improve your problem-solving skills? Keep reading to find out 17 effective problem-solving strategies, key skills, common obstacles to watch for, and tips on improving your overall problem-solving skills.
Problem-solving is the process of understanding an issue, situation, or challenge that needs to be addressed and then systematically working through possible solutions to arrive at the best outcome.
It involves critical thinking, analysis, logic, creativity, research, planning, reflection, and patience in order to overcome obstacles and find effective answers to complex questions or problems.
The ultimate goal is to implement the chosen solution successfully.
Problem-solving strategies are like frameworks or methodologies that help us solve tricky puzzles or problems we face in the workplace, at home, or with friends.
Imagine you have a big jigsaw puzzle. One strategy might be to start with the corner pieces. Another could be looking for pieces with the same colors.
Just like in puzzles, in real life, we use different plans or steps to find solutions to problems. These strategies help us think clearly, make good choices, and find the best answers without getting too stressed or giving up.
Knowing different problem-solving strategies is important because different types of problems often require different approaches to solve them effectively. Having a variety of strategies to choose from allows you to select the best method for the specific problem you are trying to solve.
This improves your ability to analyze issues thoroughly, develop solutions creatively, and tackle problems from multiple angles. Knowing multiple strategies also aids in overcoming roadblocks if your initial approach is not working.
Here are some reasons why you need to know different problem-solving strategies:
Knowing different ways to solve problems helps you tackle anything that comes your way, making life a bit easier and more fun!
Effective problem-solving strategies include breaking the problem into smaller parts, brainstorming multiple solutions, evaluating the pros and cons of each, and choosing the most viable option.
Critical thinking and creativity are essential in developing innovative solutions. Collaboration with others can also provide diverse perspectives and ideas.
By applying these strategies, you can tackle complex issues more effectively.
Now, consider a challenge you’re dealing with. Which strategy could help you find a solution? Here we will discuss key problem strategies in detail.
This strategy involves looking back at previous similar problems you have faced and the solutions that were effective in solving them.
It is useful when you are facing a problem that is very similar to something you have already solved. The main benefit is that you don’t have to come up with a brand new solution – you already know the method that worked before will likely work again.
However, the limitation is that the current problem may have some unique aspects or differences that mean your old solution is not fully applicable.
The ideal process is to thoroughly analyze the new challenge, identify the key similarities and differences versus the past case, adapt the old solution as needed to align with the current context, and then pilot it carefully before full implementation.
An example is using the same negotiation tactics from purchasing your previous home when putting in an offer on a new house. Key terms would be adjusted but overall it can save significant time versus developing a brand new strategy.
This involves gathering a group of people together to generate as many potential solutions to a problem as possible.
It is effective when you need creative ideas to solve a complex or challenging issue. By getting input from multiple people with diverse perspectives, you increase the likelihood of finding an innovative solution.
The main limitation is that brainstorming sessions can sometimes turn into unproductive gripe sessions or discussions rather than focusing on productive ideation —so they need to be properly facilitated.
The key to an effective brainstorming session is setting some basic ground rules upfront and having an experienced facilitator guide the discussion. Rules often include encouraging wild ideas, avoiding criticism of ideas during the ideation phase, and building on others’ ideas.
For instance, a struggling startup might hold a session where ideas for turnaround plans are generated and then formalized with financials and metrics.
This technique involves envisioning that the problem has already been solved and then working step-by-step backward toward the current state.
This strategy is particularly helpful for long-term, multi-step problems. By starting from the imagined solution and identifying all the steps required to reach it, you can systematically determine the actions needed. It lets you tackle a big hairy problem through smaller, reversible steps.
A limitation is that this approach may not be possible if you cannot accurately envision the solution state to start with.
The approach helps drive logical systematic thinking for complex problem-solving, but should still be combined with creative brainstorming of alternative scenarios and solutions.
An example is planning for an event – you would imagine the successful event occurring, then determine the tasks needed the week before, two weeks before, etc. all the way back to the present.
This method, named after author Rudyard Kipling, provides a framework for thoroughly analyzing a problem before jumping into solutions.
It consists of answering six fundamental questions: What, Where, When, How, Who, and Why about the challenge. Clearly defining these core elements of the problem sets the stage for generating targeted solutions.
The Kipling method enables a deep understanding of problem parameters and root causes before solution identification. By jumping to brainstorm solutions too early, critical information can be missed or the problem is loosely defined, reducing solution quality.
Answering the six fundamental questions illuminates all angles of the issue. This takes time but pays dividends in generating optimal solutions later tuned precisely to the true underlying problem.
The limitation is that meticulously working through numerous questions before addressing solutions can slow progress.
The best approach blends structured problem decomposition techniques like the Kipling method with spurring innovative solution ideation from a diverse team.
An example is using this technique after a technical process failure – the team would systematically detail What failed, Where/When did it fail, How it failed (sequence of events), Who was involved, and Why it likely failed before exploring preventative solutions.
This technique involves attempting various potential solutions sequentially until finding one that successfully solves the problem.
Trial and error works best when facing a concrete, bounded challenge with clear solution criteria and a small number of discrete options to try. By methodically testing solutions, you can determine the faulty component.
A limitation is that it can be time-intensive if the working solution set is large.
The key is limiting the variable set first. For technical problems, this boundary is inherent and each element can be iteratively tested. But for business issues, artificial constraints may be required – setting decision rules upfront to reduce options before testing.
Furthermore, hypothesis-driven experimentation is far superior to blind trial and error – have logic for why Option A may outperform Option B.
Examples include fixing printer jams by testing different paper tray and cable configurations or resolving website errors by tweaking CSS/HTML line-by-line until the code functions properly.
Heuristics refers to applying existing problem-solving formulas or frameworks rather than addressing issues completely from scratch.
This allows leveraging established best practices rather than reinventing the wheel each time.
It is effective when facing recurrent, common challenges where proven structured approaches exist.
However, heuristics may force-fit solutions to non-standard problems.
For example, a cost-benefit analysis can be used instead of custom weighting schemes to analyze potential process improvements.
Onethread allows teams to define, save, and replicate configurable project templates so proven workflows can be reliably applied across problems with some consistency rather than fully custom one-off approaches each time.
Try One thread
Experience One thread full potential, with all its features unlocked. Sign up now to start your 14-day free trial!
Insight is a problem-solving technique that involves waiting patiently for an unexpected “aha moment” when the solution pops into your mind.
It works well for personal challenges that require intuitive realizations over calculated logic. The unconscious mind makes connections leading to flashes of insight when relaxing or doing mundane tasks unrelated to the actual problem.
Benefits include out-of-the-box creative solutions. However, the limitations are that insights can’t be forced and may never come at all if too complex. Critical analysis is still required after initial insights.
A real-life example would be a writer struggling with how to end a novel. Despite extensive brainstorming, they feel stuck. Eventually while gardening one day, a perfect unexpected plot twist sparks an ideal conclusion. However, once written they still carefully review if the ending flows logically from the rest of the story.
This approach involves deconstructing a problem in reverse sequential order from the current undesirable outcome back to the initial root causes.
By mapping the chain of events backward, you can identify the origin of where things went wrong and establish the critical junctures for solving it moving ahead. Reverse engineering provides diagnostic clarity on multi-step problems.
However, the limitation is that it focuses heavily on autopsying the past versus innovating improved future solutions.
An example is tracing back from a server outage, through the cascade of infrastructure failures that led to it finally terminating at the initial script error that triggered the crisis. This root cause would then inform the preventative measure.
This technique defines the current problem state and the desired end goal state, then systematically identifies obstacles in the way of getting from one to the other.
By mapping the barriers or gaps, you can then develop solutions to address each one. This methodically connects the problem to solutions.
A limitation is that some obstacles may be unknown upfront and only emerge later.
For example, you can list down all the steps required for a new product launch – current state through production, marketing, sales, distribution, etc. to full launch (goal state) – to highlight where resource constraints or other blocks exist so they can be addressed.
Onethread allows dividing big-picture projects into discrete, manageable phases, milestones, and tasks to simplify execution just as problems can be decomposed into more achievable components. Features like dependency mapping further reinforce interconnections.
Using Onethread’s issues and subtasks feature, messy problems can be decomposed into manageable chunks.
This technique involves asking “Why did this problem occur?” and then responding with an answer that is again met with asking “Why?” This process repeats five times until the root cause is revealed.
Continually asking why digs deeper from surface symptoms to underlying systemic issues.
It is effective for getting to the source of problems originating from human error or process breakdowns.
However, some complex issues may have multiple tangled root causes not solvable through this approach alone.
An example is a retail store experiencing a sudden decline in customers. Successively asking why five times may trace an initial drop to parking challenges, stemming from a city construction project – the true starting point to address.
This involves analyzing a problem or proposed solution by categorizing internal and external factors into a 2×2 matrix: Strengths, Weaknesses as the internal rows; Opportunities and Threats as the external columns.
Systematically identifying these elements provides balanced insight to evaluate options and risks. It is impactful when evaluating alternative solutions or developing strategy amid complexity or uncertainty.
The key benefit of SWOT analysis is enabling multi-dimensional thinking when rationally evaluating options. Rather than getting anchored on just the upsides or the existing way of operating, it urges a systematic assessment through four different lenses:
Multiperspective analysis provides the needed holistic view of the balanced risk vs. reward equation for strategic decision making amid uncertainty.
However, SWOT can feel restrictive if not tailored and evolved for different issue types.
Teams should view SWOT analysis as a starting point, augmenting it further for distinct scenarios.
An example is performing a SWOT analysis on whether a small business should expand into a new market – evaluating internal capabilities to execute vs. risks in the external competitive and demand environment to inform the growth decision with eyes wide open.
This technique involves comparing the current state of performance, output, or results to the desired or expected levels to highlight shortfalls.
By quantifying the gaps, you can identify problem areas and prioritize address solutions.
Gap analysis is based on the simple principle – “you can’t improve what you don’t measure.” It enables facts-driven problem diagnosis by highlighting delta to goals, not just vague dissatisfaction that something seems wrong. And measurement immediately suggests improvement opportunities – address the biggest gaps first.
This data orientation also supports ROI analysis on fixing issues – the return from closing larger gaps outweighs narrowly targeting smaller performance deficiencies.
However, the approach is only effective if robust standards and metrics exist as the benchmark to evaluate against. Organizations should invest upfront in establishing performance frameworks.
Furthermore, while numbers are invaluable, the human context behind problems should not be ignored – quantitative versus qualitative gap assessment is optimally blended.
For example, if usage declines are noted during software gap analysis, this could be used as a signal to improve user experience through design.
A Gemba walk involves going to the actual place where work is done, directly observing the process, engaging with employees, and finding areas for improvement.
By experiencing firsthand rather than solely reviewing abstract reports, practical problems and ideas emerge.
The limitation is Gemba walks provide anecdotes not statistically significant data. It complements but does not replace comprehensive performance measurement.
An example is a factory manager inspecting the production line to spot jam areas based on direct reality rather than relying on throughput dashboards alone back in her office. Frontline insights prove invaluable.
This involves assessing the marketplace around a problem or business situation via five key factors: competitors, new entrants, substitute offerings, suppliers, and customer power.
Evaluating these forces illuminates risks and opportunities for strategy development and issue resolution. It is effective for understanding dynamic external threats and opportunities when operating in a contested space.
However, over-indexing on only external factors can overlook the internal capabilities needed to execute solutions.
A startup CEO, for example, may analyze market entry barriers, whitespace opportunities, and disruption risks across these five forces to shape new product rollout strategies and marketing approaches.
The Six Thinking Hats is a technique developed by Edward de Bono that encourages people to think about a problem from six different perspectives, each represented by a colored “thinking hat.”
The key benefit of this strategy is that it pushes team members to move outside their usual thinking style and consider new angles. This brings more diverse ideas and solutions to the table.
It works best for complex problems that require innovative solutions and when a team is stuck in an unproductive debate. The structured framework keeps the conversation flowing in a positive direction.
Limitations are that it requires training on the method itself and may feel unnatural at first. Team dynamics can also influence success – some members may dominate certain “hats” while others remain quiet.
A real-life example is a software company debating whether to build a new feature. The white hat focuses on facts, red on gut feelings, black on potential risks, yellow on benefits, green on new ideas, and blue on process. This exposes more balanced perspectives before deciding.
Onethread centralizes diverse stakeholder communication onto one platform, ensuring all voices are incorporated when evaluating project tradeoffs, just as problem-solving should consider multifaceted solutions.
Drawing out a problem involves creating visual representations like diagrams, flowcharts, and maps to work through challenging issues.
This strategy is helpful when dealing with complex situations with lots of interconnected components. The visuals simplify the complexity so you can thoroughly understand the problem and all its nuances.
Key benefits are that it allows more stakeholders to get on the same page regarding root causes and it sparks new creative solutions as connections are made visually.
However, simple problems with few variables don’t require extensive diagrams. Additionally, some challenges are so multidimensional that fully capturing every aspect is difficult.
A real-life example would be mapping out all the possible causes leading to decreased client satisfaction at a law firm. An intricate fishbone diagram with branches for issues like service delivery, technology, facilities, culture, and vendor partnerships allows the team to trace problems back to their origins and brainstorm targeted fixes.
An algorithm is a predefined step-by-step process that is guaranteed to produce the correct solution if implemented properly.
Using algorithms is effective when facing problems that have clear, binary right and wrong answers. Algorithms work for mathematical calculations, computer code, manufacturing assembly lines, and scientific experiments.
Key benefits are consistency, accuracy, and efficiency. However, they require extensive upfront development and only apply to scenarios with strict parameters. Additionally, human error can lead to mistakes.
For example, crew members of fast food chains like McDonald’s follow specific algorithms for food prep – from grill times to ingredient amounts in sandwiches, to order fulfillment procedures. This ensures uniform quality and service across all locations. However, if a step is missed, errors occur.
The problem-solving process typically includes defining the issue, analyzing details, creating solutions, weighing choices, acting, and reviewing results.
In the above, we have discussed several problem-solving strategies. For every problem-solving strategy, you have to follow these processes. Here’s a detailed step-by-step process of effective problem-solving:
The problem-solving process starts with identifying the problem. This step involves understanding the issue’s nature, its scope, and its impact. Once the problem is clearly defined, it sets the foundation for finding effective solutions.
Identifying the problem is crucial. It means figuring out exactly what needs fixing. This involves looking at the situation closely, understanding what’s wrong, and knowing how it affects things. It’s about asking the right questions to get a clear picture of the issue.
This step is important because it guides the rest of the problem-solving process. Without a clear understanding of the problem, finding a solution is much harder. It’s like diagnosing an illness before treating it. Once the problem is identified accurately, you can move on to exploring possible solutions and deciding on the best course of action.
Breaking down the problem is a key step in the problem-solving process. It involves dividing the main issue into smaller, more manageable parts. This makes it easier to understand and tackle each component one by one.
After identifying the problem, the next step is to break it down. This means splitting the big issue into smaller pieces. It’s like solving a puzzle by handling one piece at a time.
By doing this, you can focus on each part without feeling overwhelmed. It also helps in identifying the root causes of the problem. Breaking down the problem allows for a clearer analysis and makes finding solutions more straightforward.
Each smaller problem can be addressed individually, leading to an effective resolution of the overall issue. This approach not only simplifies complex problems but also aids in developing a systematic plan to solve them.
Coming up with potential solutions is the third step in the problem-solving process. It involves brainstorming various options to address the problem, considering creativity and feasibility to find the best approach.
After breaking down the problem, it’s time to think of ways to solve it. This stage is about brainstorming different solutions. You look at the smaller issues you’ve identified and start thinking of ways to fix them. This is where creativity comes in.
You want to come up with as many ideas as possible, no matter how out-of-the-box they seem. It’s important to consider all options and evaluate their pros and cons. This process allows you to gather a range of possible solutions.
Later, you can narrow these down to the most practical and effective ones. This step is crucial because it sets the stage for deciding on the best solution to implement. It’s about being open-minded and innovative to tackle the problem effectively.
Analyzing the possible solutions is the fourth step in the problem-solving process. It involves evaluating each proposed solution’s advantages and disadvantages to determine the most effective and feasible option.
After coming up with potential solutions, the next step is to analyze them. This means looking closely at each idea to see how well it solves the problem. You weigh the pros and cons of every solution.
Consider factors like cost, time, resources, and potential outcomes. This analysis helps in understanding the implications of each option. It’s about being critical and objective, ensuring that the chosen solution is not only effective but also practical.
This step is vital because it guides you towards making an informed decision. It involves comparing the solutions against each other and selecting the one that best addresses the problem.
By thoroughly analyzing the options, you can move forward with confidence, knowing you’ve chosen the best path to solve the issue.
Implementing and monitoring the solutions is the final step in the problem-solving process. It involves putting the chosen solution into action and observing its effectiveness, making adjustments as necessary.
Once you’ve selected the best solution, it’s time to put it into practice. This step is about action. You implement the chosen solution and then keep an eye on how it works. Monitoring is crucial because it tells you if the solution is solving the problem as expected.
If things don’t go as planned, you may need to make some changes. This could mean tweaking the current solution or trying a different one. The goal is to ensure the problem is fully resolved.
This step is critical because it involves real-world application. It’s not just about planning; it’s about doing and adjusting based on results. By effectively implementing and monitoring the solutions, you can achieve the desired outcome and solve the problem successfully.
Following a defined process to solve problems is important because it provides a systematic, structured approach instead of a haphazard one. Having clear steps guides logical thinking, analysis, and decision-making to increase effectiveness. Key reasons it helps are:
The problem-solving process is a powerful tool that can help us tackle any challenge we face. By following these steps, we can find solutions that work and learn important skills along the way.
Efficient problem-solving requires breaking down issues logically, evaluating options, and implementing practical solutions.
Key skills include critical thinking to understand root causes, creativity to brainstorm innovative ideas, communication abilities to collaborate with others, and decision-making to select the best way forward. Staying adaptable, reflecting on outcomes, and applying lessons learned are also essential.
With practice, these capacities will lead to increased personal and team effectiveness in systematically addressing any problem.
Let’s explore the powers you need to become a problem-solving hero!
Critical thinking and analytical skills are vital for efficient problem-solving as they enable individuals to objectively evaluate information, identify key issues, and generate effective solutions.
These skills facilitate a deeper understanding of problems, leading to logical, well-reasoned decisions. By systematically breaking down complex issues and considering various perspectives, individuals can develop more innovative and practical solutions, enhancing their problem-solving effectiveness.
Effective communication skills are essential for efficient problem-solving as they facilitate clear sharing of information, ensuring all team members understand the problem and proposed solutions.
These skills enable individuals to articulate issues, listen actively, and collaborate effectively, fostering a productive environment where diverse ideas can be exchanged and refined. By enhancing mutual understanding, communication skills contribute significantly to identifying and implementing the most viable solutions.
Strong decision-making skills are crucial for efficient problem-solving, as they enable individuals to choose the best course of action from multiple alternatives.
These skills involve evaluating the potential outcomes of different solutions, considering the risks and benefits, and making informed choices. Effective decision-making leads to the implementation of solutions that are likely to resolve problems effectively, ensuring resources are used efficiently and goals are achieved.
Planning and prioritization are key for efficient problem-solving, ensuring resources are allocated effectively to address the most critical issues first. This approach helps in organizing tasks according to their urgency and impact, streamlining efforts towards achieving the desired outcome efficiently.
Emotional intelligence enhances problem-solving by allowing individuals to manage emotions, understand others, and navigate social complexities. It fosters a positive, collaborative environment, essential for generating creative solutions and making informed, empathetic decisions.
Leadership skills drive efficient problem-solving by inspiring and guiding teams toward common goals. Effective leaders motivate their teams, foster innovation, and navigate challenges, ensuring collective efforts are focused and productive in addressing problems.
Time management is crucial in problem-solving, enabling individuals to allocate appropriate time to each task. By efficiently managing time, one can ensure that critical problems are addressed promptly without neglecting other responsibilities.
Data analysis skills are essential for problem-solving, as they enable individuals to sift through data, identify trends, and extract actionable insights. This analytical approach supports evidence-based decision-making, leading to more accurate and effective solutions.
Research skills are vital for efficient problem-solving, allowing individuals to gather relevant information, explore various solutions, and understand the problem’s context. This thorough exploration aids in developing well-informed, innovative solutions.
Becoming a great problem solver takes practice, but with these skills, you’re on your way to becoming a problem-solving hero.
Improving your problem-solving skills can make you a master at overcoming challenges. Learn from experts, practice regularly, welcome feedback, try new methods, experiment, and study others’ success to become better.
Improving problem-solving skills by learning from experts involves seeking mentorship, attending workshops, and studying case studies. Experts provide insights and techniques that refine your approach, enhancing your ability to tackle complex problems effectively.
To enhance your problem-solving skills, learning from experts can be incredibly beneficial. Engaging with mentors, participating in specialized workshops, and analyzing case studies from seasoned professionals can offer valuable perspectives and strategies.
Experts share their experiences, mistakes, and successes, providing practical knowledge that can be applied to your own problem-solving process. This exposure not only broadens your understanding but also introduces you to diverse methods and approaches, enabling you to tackle challenges more efficiently and creatively.
Improving problem-solving skills through practice involves tackling a variety of challenges regularly. This hands-on approach helps in refining techniques and strategies, making you more adept at identifying and solving problems efficiently.
One of the most effective ways to enhance your problem-solving skills is through consistent practice. By engaging with different types of problems on a regular basis, you develop a deeper understanding of various strategies and how they can be applied.
This hands-on experience allows you to experiment with different approaches, learn from mistakes, and build confidence in your ability to tackle challenges.
Regular practice not only sharpens your analytical and critical thinking skills but also encourages adaptability and innovation, key components of effective problem-solving.
Being open to feedback is like unlocking a secret level in a game. It helps you boost your problem-solving skills. Improving problem-solving skills through openness to feedback involves actively seeking and constructively responding to critiques.
This receptivity enables you to refine your strategies and approaches based on insights from others, leading to more effective solutions.
Learning new approaches and methodologies is like adding new tools to your toolbox. It makes you a smarter problem-solver. Enhancing problem-solving skills by learning new approaches and methodologies involves staying updated with the latest trends and techniques in your field.
This continuous learning expands your toolkit, enabling innovative solutions and a fresh perspective on challenges.
Experimentation is like being a scientist of your own problems. It’s a powerful way to improve your problem-solving skills. Boosting problem-solving skills through experimentation means trying out different solutions to see what works best. This trial-and-error approach fosters creativity and can lead to unique solutions that wouldn’t have been considered otherwise.
Analyzing competitors’ success is like being a detective. It’s a smart way to boost your problem-solving skills. Improving problem-solving skills by analyzing competitors’ success involves studying their strategies and outcomes. Understanding what worked for them can provide valuable insights and inspire effective solutions for your own challenges.
Facing obstacles when solving problems is common. Recognizing these barriers, like fear of failure or lack of information, helps us find ways around them for better solutions.
Fear of failure is like a big, scary monster that stops us from solving problems. It’s a challenge many face. Because being afraid of making mistakes can make us too scared to try new solutions.
How can we overcome this? First, understand that it’s okay to fail. Failure is not the opposite of success; it’s part of learning. Every time we fail, we discover one more way not to solve a problem, getting us closer to the right solution. Treat each attempt like an experiment. It’s not about failing; it’s about testing and learning.
Lack of information is like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces. It’s a big challenge in problem-solving. Because without all the necessary details, finding a solution is much harder.
How can we fix this? Start by gathering as much information as you can. Ask questions, do research, or talk to experts. Think of yourself as a detective looking for clues. The more information you collect, the clearer the picture becomes. Then, use what you’ve learned to think of solutions.
A fixed mindset is like being stuck in quicksand; it makes solving problems harder. It means thinking you can’t improve or learn new ways to solve issues.
How can we change this? First, believe that you can grow and learn from challenges. Think of your brain as a muscle that gets stronger every time you use it. When you face a problem, instead of saying “I can’t do this,” try thinking, “I can’t do this yet.” Look for lessons in every challenge and celebrate small wins.
Everyone starts somewhere, and mistakes are just steps on the path to getting better. By shifting to a growth mindset, you’ll see problems as opportunities to grow. Keep trying, keep learning, and your problem-solving skills will soar!
Jumping to conclusions is like trying to finish a race before it starts. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. That means making a decision too quickly without looking at all the facts.
How can we avoid this? First, take a deep breath and slow down. Think about the problem like a puzzle. You need to see all the pieces before you know where they go. Ask questions, gather information, and consider different possibilities. Don’t choose the first solution that comes to mind. Instead, compare a few options.
Feeling overwhelmed is like being buried under a mountain of puzzles. It’s a big challenge in problem-solving. When we’re overwhelmed, everything seems too hard to handle.
How can we deal with this? Start by taking a step back. Breathe deeply and focus on one thing at a time. Break the big problem into smaller pieces, like sorting puzzle pieces by color. Tackle each small piece one by one. It’s also okay to ask for help. Sometimes, talking to someone else can give you a new perspective.
Confirmation bias is like wearing glasses that only let you see what you want to see. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. Because it makes us focus only on information that agrees with what we already believe, ignoring anything that doesn’t.
How can we overcome this? First, be aware that you might be doing it. It’s like checking if your glasses are on right. Then, purposely look for information that challenges your views. It’s like trying on a different pair of glasses to see a new perspective. Ask questions and listen to answers, even if they don’t fit what you thought before.
Groupthink is like everyone in a group deciding to wear the same outfit without asking why. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. It means making decisions just because everyone else agrees, without really thinking it through.
How can we avoid this? First, encourage everyone in the group to share their ideas, even if they’re different. It’s like inviting everyone to show their unique style of clothes.
Listen to all opinions and discuss them. It’s okay to disagree; it helps us think of better solutions. Also, sometimes, ask someone outside the group for their thoughts. They might see something everyone in the group missed.
Overcoming obstacles in problem-solving requires patience, openness, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. By recognizing these barriers, we can develop strategies to navigate around them, leading to more effective and creative solutions.
The most common techniques include brainstorming, the 5 Whys, mind mapping, SWOT analysis, and using algorithms or heuristics. Each approach has its strengths, suitable for different types of problems.
There’s no one-size-fits-all strategy. The best approach depends on the problem’s complexity, available resources, and time constraints. Combining multiple techniques often yields the best results.
Improve your problem-solving skills by practicing regularly, learning from experts, staying open to feedback, and continuously updating your knowledge on new approaches and methodologies.
Yes, tools like mind mapping software, online courses on critical thinking, and books on problem-solving techniques can be very helpful. Joining forums or groups focused on problem-solving can also provide support and insights.
Common mistakes include jumping to conclusions without fully understanding the problem, ignoring valuable feedback, sticking to familiar solutions without considering alternatives, and not breaking down complex problems into manageable parts.
Mastering problem-solving strategies equips us with the tools to tackle challenges across all areas of life. By understanding and applying these techniques, embracing a growth mindset, and learning from both successes and obstacles, we can transform problems into opportunities for growth. Continuously improving these skills ensures we’re prepared to face and solve future challenges more effectively.
Onethread empowers you to plan, organise, and track projects with ease, ensuring you meet deadlines, allocate resources efficiently, and keep progress transparent.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy .
Giving modern marketing teams superpowers with short links that stand out.
© Copyright 2023 Onethread, Inc
Picture this, you're handling your daily tasks at work and your boss calls you in and says, "We have a problem."
Unfortunately, we don't live in a world in which problems are instantly resolved with the snap of our fingers. Knowing how to effectively solve problems is an important professional skill to hone. If you have a problem that needs to be solved, what is the right process to use to ensure you get the most effective solution?
In this article we'll break down the problem-solving process and how you can find the most effective solutions for complex problems.
Problem solving is the process of finding a resolution for a specific issue or conflict. There are many possible solutions for solving a problem, which is why it's important to go through a problem-solving process to find the best solution. You could use a flathead screwdriver to unscrew a Phillips head screw, but there is a better tool for the situation. Utilizing common problem-solving techniques helps you find the best solution to fit the needs of the specific situation, much like using the right tools.
In this ebook, learn how to equip employees to make better decisions—so your business can pivot, adapt, and tackle challenges more effectively than your competition.
While it might be tempting to dive into a problem head first, take the time to move step by step. Here’s how you can effectively break down the problem-solving process with your team:
One of the easiest ways to identify a problem is to ask questions. A good place to start is to ask journalistic questions, like:
Who : Who is involved with this problem? Who caused the problem? Who is most affected by this issue?
What: What is happening? What is the extent of the issue? What does this problem prevent from moving forward?
Where: Where did this problem take place? Does this problem affect anything else in the immediate area?
When: When did this problem happen? When does this problem take effect? Is this an urgent issue that needs to be solved within a certain timeframe?
Why: Why is it happening? Why does it impact workflows?
How: How did this problem occur? How is it affecting workflows and team members from being productive?
Asking journalistic questions can help you define a strong problem statement so you can highlight the current situation objectively, and create a plan around that situation.
Here’s an example of how a design team uses journalistic questions to identify their problem:
Overarching problem: Design requests are being missed
Who: Design team, digital marketing team, web development team
What: Design requests are forgotten, lost, or being created ad hoc.
Where: Email requests, design request spreadsheet
When: Missed requests on January 20th, January 31st, February 4th, February 6th
How : Email request was lost in inbox and the intake spreadsheet was not updated correctly. The digital marketing team had to delay launching ads for a few days while design requests were bottlenecked. Designers had to work extra hours to ensure all requests were completed.
In this example, there are many different aspects of this problem that can be solved. Using journalistic questions can help you identify different issues and who you should involve in the process.
If at all possible, bring in a facilitator who doesn't have a major stake in the solution. Bringing an individual who has little-to-no stake in the matter can help keep your team on track and encourage good problem-solving skills.
Here are a few brainstorming techniques to encourage creative thinking:
Brainstorm alone before hand: Before you come together as a group, provide some context to your team on what exactly the issue is that you're brainstorming. This will give time for you and your teammates to have some ideas ready by the time you meet.
Say yes to everything (at first): When you first start brainstorming, don't say no to any ideas just yet—try to get as many ideas down as possible. Having as many ideas as possible ensures that you’ll get a variety of solutions. Save the trimming for the next step of the strategy.
Talk to team members one-on-one: Some people may be less comfortable sharing their ideas in a group setting. Discuss the issue with team members individually and encourage them to share their opinions without restrictions—you might find some more detailed insights than originally anticipated.
Break out of your routine: If you're used to brainstorming in a conference room or over Zoom calls, do something a little different! Take your brainstorming meeting to a coffee shop or have your Zoom call while you're taking a walk. Getting out of your routine can force your brain out of its usual rut and increase critical thinking.
After you brainstorm with team members to get their unique perspectives on a scenario, it's time to look at the different strategies and decide which option is the best solution for the problem at hand. When defining the solution, consider these main two questions: What is the desired outcome of this solution and who stands to benefit from this solution?
Set a deadline for when this decision needs to be made and update stakeholders accordingly. Sometimes there's too many people who need to make a decision. Use your best judgement based on the limitations provided to do great things fast.
To implement your solution, start by working with the individuals who are as closest to the problem. This can help those most affected by the problem get unblocked. Then move farther out to those who are less affected, and so on and so forth. Some solutions are simple enough that you don’t need to work through multiple teams.
After you prioritize implementation with the right teams, assign out the ongoing work that needs to be completed by the rest of the team. This can prevent people from becoming overburdened during the implementation plan . Once your solution is in place, schedule check-ins to see how the solution is working and course-correct if necessary.
There are a few ways to go about identifying problems (and solutions). Here are some strategies you can try, as well as common ways to apply them:
Trial and error problem solving doesn't usually require a whole team of people to solve. To use trial and error problem solving, identify the cause of the problem, and then rapidly test possible solutions to see if anything changes.
This problem-solving method is often used in tech support teams through troubleshooting.
The 5 whys problem-solving method helps get to the root cause of an issue. You start by asking once, “Why did this issue happen?” After answering the first why, ask again, “Why did that happen?” You'll do this five times until you can attribute the problem to a root cause.
This technique can help you dig in and find the human error that caused something to go wrong. More importantly, it also helps you and your team develop an actionable plan so that you can prevent the issue from happening again.
Here’s an example:
Problem: The email marketing campaign was accidentally sent to the wrong audience.
“Why did this happen?” Because the audience name was not updated in our email platform.
“Why were the audience names not changed?” Because the audience segment was not renamed after editing.
“Why was the audience segment not renamed?” Because everybody has an individual way of creating an audience segment.
“Why does everybody have an individual way of creating an audience segment?” Because there is no standardized process for creating audience segments.
“Why is there no standardized process for creating audience segments?” Because the team hasn't decided on a way to standardize the process as the team introduced new members.
In this example, we can see a few areas that could be optimized to prevent this mistake from happening again. When working through these questions, make sure that everyone who was involved in the situation is present so that you can co-create next steps to avoid the same problem.
A SWOT analysis can help you highlight the strengths and weaknesses of a specific solution. SWOT stands for:
Strength: Why is this specific solution a good fit for this problem?
Weaknesses: What are the weak points of this solution? Is there anything that you can do to strengthen those weaknesses?
Opportunities: What other benefits could arise from implementing this solution?
Threats: Is there anything about this decision that can detrimentally impact your team?
As you identify specific solutions, you can highlight the different strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each solution.
This particular problem-solving strategy is good to use when you're narrowing down the answers and need to compare and contrast the differences between different solutions.
After you’ve worked through a tough problem, don't forget to celebrate how far you've come. Not only is this important for your team of problem solvers to see their work in action, but this can also help you become a more efficient, effective , and flexible team. The more problems you tackle together, the more you’ll achieve.
Looking for a tool to help solve problems on your team? Track project implementation with a work management tool like Asana .
Forage puts students first. Our blog articles are written independently by our editorial team. They have not been paid for or sponsored by our partners. See our full editorial guidelines .
Why do employers hire employees? To help them solve problems. Whether you’re a financial analyst deciding where to invest your firm’s money, or a marketer trying to figure out which channel to direct your efforts, companies hire people to help them find solutions. Problem-solving is an essential and marketable soft skill in the workplace.
So, how can you improve your problem-solving and show employers you have this valuable skill? In this guide, we’ll cover:
Why are problem-solving skills important, problem-solving skills examples, how to include problem-solving skills in a job application, how to improve problem-solving skills, problem-solving: the bottom line.
Problem-solving skills are the ability to identify problems, brainstorm and analyze answers, and implement the best solutions. An employee with good problem-solving skills is both a self-starter and a collaborative teammate; they are proactive in understanding the root of a problem and work with others to consider a wide range of solutions before deciding how to move forward.
Examples of using problem-solving skills in the workplace include:
Problem-solving skills are the most sought-after soft skill of 2022. In fact, 86% of employers look for problem-solving skills on student resumes, according to the National Association of Colleges and Employers Job Outlook 2022 survey .
It’s unsurprising why employers are looking for this skill: companies will always need people to help them find solutions to their problems. Someone proactive and successful at problem-solving is valuable to any team.
“Employers are looking for employees who can make decisions independently, especially with the prevalence of remote/hybrid work and the need to communicate asynchronously,” Eric Mochnacz, senior HR consultant at Red Clover, says. “Employers want to see individuals who can make well-informed decisions that mitigate risk, and they can do so without suffering from analysis paralysis.”
Build the confidence and practical skills that employers are looking for with Forage’s free job simulations.
Problem-solving includes three main parts: identifying the problem, analyzing possible solutions, and deciding on the best course of action.
>>MORE: Discover the right career for you based on your skills with a career aptitude test .
Research is the first step of problem-solving because it helps you understand the context of a problem. Researching a problem enables you to learn why the problem is happening. For example, is revenue down because of a new sales tactic? Or because of seasonality? Is there a problem with who the sales team is reaching out to?
Research broadens your scope to all possible reasons why the problem could be happening. Then once you figure it out, it helps you narrow your scope to start solving it.
Analysis is the next step of problem-solving. Now that you’ve identified the problem, analytical skills help you look at what potential solutions there might be.
“The goal of analysis isn’t to solve a problem, actually — it’s to better understand it because that’s where the real solution will be found,” Gretchen Skalka, owner of Career Insights Consulting, says. “Looking at a problem through the lens of impartiality is the only way to get a true understanding of it from all angles.”
Once you’ve figured out where the problem is coming from and what solutions are, it’s time to decide on the best way to go forth. Decision-making skills help you determine what resources are available, what a feasible action plan entails, and what solution is likely to lead to success.
Employers looking for problem-solving skills might include the word “problem-solving” or other synonyms like “ critical thinking ” or “analytical skills” in the job description.
“I would add ‘buzzwords’ you can find from the job descriptions or LinkedIn endorsements section to filter into your resume to comply with the ATS,” Matthew Warzel, CPRW resume writer, advises. Warzel recommends including these skills on your resume but warns to “leave the soft skills as adjectives in the summary section. That is the only place soft skills should be mentioned.”
On the other hand, you can list hard skills separately in a skills section on your resume .
Learn how to showcase your skills and craft an award-winning resume with this free masterclass from Forage.
Avg. Time: 5 to 6 hours
Skills you’ll build: Resume writing, professional brand, professional summary, narrative, transferable skills, industry keywords, illustrating your impact, standing out
Explaining your problem-solving skills in an interview can seem daunting. You’re required to expand on your process — how you identified a problem, analyzed potential solutions, and made a choice. As long as you can explain your approach, it’s okay if that solution didn’t come from a professional work experience.
“Young professionals shortchange themselves by thinking only paid-for solutions matter to employers,” Skalka says. “People at the genesis of their careers don’t have a wealth of professional experience to pull from, but they do have relevant experience to share.”
Aaron Case, career counselor and CPRW at Resume Genius, agrees and encourages early professionals to share this skill. “If you don’t have any relevant work experience yet, you can still highlight your problem-solving skills in your cover letter,” he says. “Just showcase examples of problems you solved while completing your degree, working at internships, or volunteering. You can even pull examples from completely unrelated part-time jobs, as long as you make it clear how your problem-solving ability transfers to your new line of work.”
Problem-solving doesn’t just require finding solutions to problems that are already there. It’s also about being proactive when something isn’t working as you hoped it would. Practice questioning and getting curious about processes and activities in your everyday life. What could you improve? What would you do if you had more resources for this process? If you had fewer? Challenge yourself to challenge the world around you.
“Employers in the modern workplace value digital problem-solving skills, like being able to find a technology solution to a traditional issue,” Case says. “For example, when I first started working as a marketing writer, my department didn’t have the budget to hire a professional voice actor for marketing video voiceovers. But I found a perfect solution to the problem with an AI voiceover service that cost a fraction of the price of an actor.”
Being comfortable with new technology — even ones you haven’t used before — is a valuable skill in an increasingly hybrid and remote world. Don’t be afraid to research new and innovative technologies to help automate processes or find a more efficient technological solution.
Problem-solving isn’t done in a silo, and it shouldn’t be. Use your collaboration skills to gather multiple perspectives, help eliminate bias, and listen to alternative solutions. Ask others where they think the problem is coming from and what solutions would help them with your workflow. From there, try to compromise on a solution that can benefit everyone.
If we’ve learned anything from the past few years, it’s that the world of work is constantly changing — which means it’s crucial to know how to adapt . Be comfortable narrowing down a solution, then changing your direction when a colleague provides a new piece of information. Challenge yourself to get out of your comfort zone, whether with your personal routine or trying a new system at work.
Just like adapting requires you to challenge your routine and tradition, good problem-solving requires you to put yourself in challenging situations — especially ones where you don’t have relevant experience or expertise to find a solution. Because you won’t know how to tackle the problem, you’ll learn new problem-solving skills and how to navigate new challenges. Ask your manager or a peer if you can help them work on a complicated problem, and be proactive about asking them questions along the way.
What careers are right for you based on your skills? Take this quiz to find out. It’s completely free — you’ll just need to sign up to get your results!
Step 1 of 3
Companies always need people to help them find solutions — especially proactive employees who have practical analytical skills and can collaborate to decide the best way to move forward. Whether or not you have experience solving problems in a professional workplace, illustrate your problem-solving skills by describing your research, analysis, and decision-making process — and make it clear that you’re the solution to the employer’s current problems.
Image Credit: Christina Morillo / Pexels
6 negotiation skills to level up your work life, how to build conflict resolution skills: case studies and examples, what is github uses and getting started, upskill with forage.
Build career skills recruiters are looking for.
To bring the best ideas forward, teams must build psychological safety.
Teams today aren’t just asked to execute tasks: They’re called upon to solve problems. You’d think that many brains working together would mean better solutions, but the reality is that too often problem-solving teams fall victim to inefficiency, conflict, and cautious conclusions. The two charts below will help your team think about how to collaborate better and come up with the best solutions for the thorniest challenges.
There is more to motivation than ambition and work ethic. learn how to recognize and maximize key drivers for business success..
Entrepreneurs are typically highly motivated individuals . Driven and ambitious, they see the reward in taking less predictable approaches and embracing routines that stray from the standard 9 to 5 in pursuit of the big break.
When you are solely responsible for your own success, removed from the safety net of corporate infrastructure and hierarchical team structures, you have an immense need for self-motivation . The motivations of others also become more impactful. But motivation is far more complex than we often realize. Different minds are stimulated in different ways--it's this intricate blend of psyches that makes work culture so fascinating. Through diverse approaches, even those that conflict with one another, we land on solutions that are far more interesting than those we would if everyone were programed to think the same way.
However, these mindsets don't necessarily work in synergy, and so maximizing them--both our own and others'--is as much about acknowledging them as it is about displaying them in the first place. I've found that people operate on extreme motivations that fall into four distinct categories, and while this is not a judgmental spectrum it does offer some insight into how individuals operate and how to get the best out of them. It's about various ways we can think about who we are in the world of business and invention.
There are two ways to tackle a problem. First, you can zone in on the issue at hand and explore appropriate responses that will lead to an effective end result. There is an absence of reality here, and it can have the potential to be too narrowly focused as you become embroiled in the issue at hand. Alternatively, you can look beyond the problem itself and picture the positive outcome you want to work toward. By focusing on this, you allow for change and fluidity, adapting the individual solutions along the way.
Think about it in the context of setting up a new business. A leader who is problem-oriented will consider the steps needed to reach the short-term goal of making money--the number of clients required, the budgets required, and so on. A solution-oriented individual will consider the bigger picture--long-term business growth, acquisition, diversification--and create a route to resolution based on that. Through a more future-focused lens, incremental solutions can be found along the journey to this goal.
Project management typically falls into two schools of thought. There are those who break the work down into tasks that are assigned to different groups, who then work step by step like a symphony as they pursue measured progress. Work becomes highly processed, with each achievement being accomplished in methodical and ordered ways. On the other hand, we see individuals who focus on the end goal and allow for change and adaptation along the way. By prioritizing the anticipated accomplishment, these people can be more fluid and flexible, allowing for unanticipated changes along the way.
In the U.S., in particular, we are constantly fed messages that pertain to achievement and winning. The American dream is built on prosperity and success, and from an early age we are encouraged to idealize being the best. Competitively oriented people are motivated to pursue individual excellence--they want to be number one. Yet there are others who are no less driven but instead seek satisfaction through collaboration and shared ambition: connecting with others, mining group intelligence, and maintaining unity among the group. When working with such individuals, it's critical to maintain contact and assign roles, in contrast to competitively oriented people who perform best when given a task and are met at the other end.
The final categorization is perhaps the most intriguing and applies to a deeper personal impulse. While the other characteristics apply to an individual's approach to his or her work and professional attainment, motivations around identity are indicative of a more intrinsic desire. Those focused on self-identity are motivated by activities that will further their personal brand. Decisions are made on the basis of the value they offer to furthering oneself, with each achievement considered a steppingstone to self-promotion. Alternatively, a possibly more intuitive group favors collective identity, shared values, and ambitions combined for a more holistic definition of success.
No single approach is better than the other. Instead, recognizing and understanding these motivational drivers will yield the best results. As individuals, we benefit from self-awareness and exploration. Spend time considering your motivations, and you can build a working environment that will encourage a higher success rate. When considering clients and colleagues, use motivational drivers like a tool; celebrate the diversity and show empathy toward the ways in which you can work best with each approach. Flexibility is key to maximizing these innate characteristics--doing this can help you and your business thrive.
The Daily Digest for Entrepreneurs and Business Leaders
Privacy Policy
October 26, 2023 by MindManager Blog
Problem solving may unfold differently depending on the industry, or even the department you work in. However, most agree that before you can fix any issue, you need to be clear on what it is, why it’s happening, and what your ideal long-term solution will achieve.
Understanding both the nature and the cause of a problem is the only way to figure out which actions will help you resolve it.
Given that most problem-solving processes are part inspiration and part perspiration, you’ll be more successful if you can reach for a problem solving tool that facilitates collaboration, encourages creative thinking, and makes it easier to implement the fix you devise.
The problem solving tools include three unique categories: problem solving diagrams, problem solving mind maps, and problem solving software solutions.
They include:
In this article, we’ve put together a roundup of versatile problem solving tools and software to help you and your team map out and repair workplace issues as efficiently as possible.
Let’s get started!
Mapping your way out of a problem is the simplest way to see where you are, and where you need to end up.
Not only do visual problem maps let you plot the most efficient route from Point A (dysfunctional situation) to Point B (flawless process), problem mapping diagrams make it easier to see:
A visual problem solving process help to solidify understanding. Furthermore, it’s a great way for you and your team to transform abstract ideas into a practical, reconstructive plan.
Here are three examples of common problem mapping diagrams you can try with your team:
Fishbone diagrams are a common problem solving tool so-named because, once complete, they resemble the skeleton of a fish.
With the possible root causes of an issue (the ribs) branching off from either side of a spine line attached to the head (the problem), dynamic fishbone diagrams let you:
Fishbone diagrams are also known as cause and effect or Ishikawa diagrams.
A flowchart is an easy-to-understand diagram with a variety of applications. But you can use it to outline and examine how the steps of a flawed process connect.
Made up of a few simple symbols linked with arrows indicating workflow direction, flowcharts clearly illustrate what happens at each stage of a process – and how each event impacts other events and decisions.
Frequently used as a strategic planning tool, strategy maps also work well as problem mapping diagrams. Based on a hierarchal system, thoughts and ideas can be arranged on a single page to flesh out a potential resolution.
Once you’ve got a few tactics you feel are worth exploring as possible ways to overcome a challenge, a strategy map will help you establish the best route to your problem-solving goal.
Problem solving mind maps are especially valuable in visualization. Because they facilitate the brainstorming process that plays a key role in both root cause analysis and the identification of potential solutions, they help make problems more solvable.
Mind maps are diagrams that represent your thinking. Since many people struggle taking or working with hand-written or typed notes, mind maps were designed to let you lay out and structure your thoughts visually so you can play with ideas, concepts, and solutions the same way your brain does.
By starting with a single notion that branches out into greater detail, problem solving mind maps make it easy to:
Mind maps are a valuable problem solving tool because they’re geared toward bringing out the flexible thinking that creative solutions require. Here are three types of problem solving mind maps you can use to facilitate the brainstorming process.
A mental map helps you get your thoughts about what might be causing a workplace issue out of your head and onto a shared digital space.
Because mental maps mirror the way our brains take in and analyze new information, using them to describe your theories visually will help you and your team work through and test those thought models.
Idea maps let you take advantage of a wide assortment of colors and images to lay down and organize your scattered thought process. Idea maps are ideal brainstorming tools because they allow you to present and explore ideas about the best way to solve a problem collaboratively, and with a shared sense of enthusiasm for outside-the-box thinking.
Concept maps are one of the best ways to shape your thoughts around a potential solution because they let you create interlinked, visual representations of intricate concepts.
By laying out your suggested problem-solving process digitally – and using lines to form and define relationship connections – your group will be able to see how each piece of the solution puzzle connects with another.
Problem solving software is the best way to take advantage of multiple problem solving tools in one platform. While some software programs are geared toward specific industries or processes – like manufacturing or customer relationship management, for example – others, like MindManager , are purpose-built to work across multiple trades, departments, and teams.
Here are three problem-solving software examples.
Layered process audits (LPAs) help companies oversee production processes and keep an eye on the cost and quality of the goods they create. Dedicated LPA software makes problem solving easier for manufacturers because it helps them see where costly leaks are occurring and allows all levels of management to get involved in repairing those leaks.
Charting software comes in all shapes and sizes to fit a variety of business sectors. Pareto charts, for example, combine bar charts with line graphs so companies can compare different problems or contributing factors to determine their frequency, cost, and significance. Charting software is often used in marketing, where a variety of bar charts and X-Y axis diagrams make it possible to display and examine competitor profiles, customer segmentation, and sales trends.
No matter where you work, or what your problem-solving role looks like, MindManager is a problem solving software that will make your team more productive in figuring out why a process, plan, or project isn’t working the way it should.
Once you know why an obstruction, shortfall, or difficulty exists, you can use MindManager’s wide range of brainstorming and problem mapping diagrams to:
MindManager is the ultimate problem solving software.
Not only is it versatile enough to use as your go-to system for puzzling out all types of workplace problems, MindManager’s built-in forecasting tools, timeline charts, and warning indicators let you plan, implement, and monitor your solutions.
By allowing your group to work together more effectively to break down problems, uncover solutions, and rebuild processes and workflows, MindManager’s versatile collection of problem solving tools will help make everyone on your team a more efficient problem solver.
Download a free trial today to get started!
MindManager helps boost collaboration and productivity among remote and hybrid teams to achieve better results, faster.
MindManager® helps individuals, teams, and enterprises bring greater clarity and structure to plans, projects, and processes. It provides visual productivity tools and mind mapping software to help take you and your organization to where you want to be.
Aug 31, 2024
Posted by: Regine Fe Arat
Crafting a clear and concise problem statement is an essential skill in project management. It’s a powerful tool that you can use for effective problem-solving as it guides teams toward innovative solutions and measurable outcomes.
Whether you’re a seasoned project manager or a newcomer to the field, being able to write problem statements can significantly enhance your ability to tackle complex challenges and drive meaningful change.
A problem statement concisely describes an issue or challenge that needs to be addressed. An effective problem statement frames the issue in a way that facilitates a deeper understanding and guides the problem-solving process.
At its core, a well-crafted problem statement should capture the essence of the challenge at hand, providing enough context for stakeholders to grasp the issue’s significance. It helps you find the most appropriate solution and ensures that all team members are aligned in their understanding of the problem’s scope and implications.
In this comprehensive guide, you’ll find out what problem statements are and what types you can use. You’ll also find practical examples and actionable tips to help you create impactful problem statements of your own.
Here are the three key components of a problem statement:
You should clearly state the core issue or challenge to be addressed. This is the heart of your problem statement. Articulate it in a way that’s easy to understand and free from ambiguity.
While the problem statement itself shouldn’t propose specific solutions, it can outline the general approach or methodology you’ll use to address the issue. For example, you might mention the type of research, analysis or problem-solving techniques your team will employ.
This component outlines why addressing the problem is important and what the desired outcome looks like. It should clarify the goals of the problem-solving effort and define the boundaries of what you’ll address. This helps focus efforts and set clear expectations for what the project or initiative aims to achieve.
A problem statement is a versatile tool that you can use across various scenarios in both professional and personal contexts. They are particularly valuable in the following cases:
Understanding different types of problem statements can help you choose the best approach for your specific situation.
Let’s explore three common types:
This type of problem statement focuses on the current state of affairs and highlights the gap between the existing situation and the desired outcome.
It’s particularly effective when you are addressing ongoing issues or systemic problems within an organization.
Example: “Our customer support team currently handles 150 tickets, on average, per day with a resolution time of 48 hours. This prolonged response time has led to a 15% decrease in customer satisfaction scores over the past quarter, potentially impacting our retention rates and brand reputation.”
A destination problem statement emphasizes the desired future state or goal.
It’s ideal for situations where you want to inspire change and motivate teams to work toward a specific vision.
Example: “We aim to create a seamless onboarding experience for new employees that reduces the time to full productivity from 12 to six weeks while increasing new hire satisfaction scores by 25% within the next fiscal year.”
This type of problem statement focuses on the impact of an issue on specific individuals or groups.
It’s particularly useful when you need to highlight the human element of a problem and garner support for change.
Example: “Junior software developers in our organization report feeling overwhelmed and unsupported, with 60% expressing dissatisfaction with their professional growth opportunities. This has resulted in a 30% turnover rate among this group in the past year, leading to increased recruitment costs and knowledge loss.”
Crafting an effective problem statement takes practice and attention to detail. Follow these steps to create impactful problem statements:
Before putting pen to paper, invest time in thoroughly understanding the issue at hand. Gather data, conduct interviews with stakeholders and observe the problem in action if possible. This deep understanding will form the foundation of your problem statement.
Articulate the problem in simple, straightforward language. Avoid jargon or overly technical terms that might confuse readers. Your goal is to ensure that anyone reading the statement can quickly grasp the core issue.
Include relevant background information that helps readers understand the problem’s significance. This might include historical data, industry benchmarks or organizational goals that the issue is affecting.
Dig deeper to uncover the underlying reasons for the problem. Avoid focusing on symptoms. Instead, strive to identify the fundamental issues that need to be addressed. Tools like the “5 whys” technique can be helpful in this process.
Use concrete details and quantifiable metrics whenever possible. Instead of saying, “Customer satisfaction is low,” specify, “Customer satisfaction scores have dropped by 15% in the past quarter.” This precision helps create a clear picture of the problem’s scope and impact.
Incorporate measurable elements that can be used to track progress and determine when the problem has been resolved. This might include specific metrics, timeframes or benchmarks.
Ensure the problem statement describes an issue the organization can actually address. You’ll need to be realistic.
Consider your organization’s resources and constraints. While ambition is important, an overly broad or unattainable goal can be demotivating and unhelpful.
Resist the temptation to propose solutions in the problem statement. The goal is to clearly define the problem, not to prescribe how it should be solved. This approach encourages creative thinking and enables you and your team to consider a range of potential solutions.
Tailor your problem statement to the intended audience. The level of detail and technical language may vary depending on whether you’re presenting to executives, team members or external stakeholders.
Share your draft problem statement with colleagues or stakeholders to gather their input. Fresh perspectives can help identify blind spots or areas that need clarification.
Refine your problem statement based on the feedback you receive. Don’t be afraid to go through multiple iterations to achieve the most clear and impactful statement possible.
Review your problem statement to ensure it remains objective and free from bias. Avoid language that assigns blame or makes assumptions about causes or solutions.
While problem statements can be a powerful tool for problem-solving, you may face several common challenges when writing yours. Being aware of these pitfalls can help you avoid them and create more effective problem statements.
One of the most frequent issues in problem statement writing is finding the right balance between detail and clarity.
Oversimplifying the problem can lead to a statement that’s too vague to be actionable. On the other hand, including too much detail can obscure the core issue and make the statement difficult to understand.
To overcome this challenge, focus on the essential elements of the problem. Start with a clear, concise statement about the issue, then add only the most relevant contextual details. Use specific, measurable criteria to define the problem’s scope and impact, but avoid getting bogged down in excessive technical jargon or minute, unhelpful details.
Another common pitfall is failing to consider the diverse perspectives of all the stakeholders the problem affects. This can result in a problem statement that doesn’t fully capture the issue’s complexity or fails to resonate with key decision-makers.
To address this challenge, make an effort to gather input from a wide range of stakeholders before finalizing your problem statement. This might include conducting interviews, surveys or focus groups with employees, customers, partners or other relevant parties.
Incorporate these diverse viewpoints into your problem statement to create a more comprehensive and compelling representation of the issue.
Sometimes, problem statements can be well-crafted but fail to align with broader organizational objectives. This misalignment can lead to wasted resources and efforts on issues that, while important, may not be critical to the company’s overall success.
To ensure your problem statement aligns with the organization’s goals, review your company’s mission statement, strategic plans and key performance indicators before you get started. Consider how the problem you’re addressing relates to these broader objectives.
If possible, explicitly link the problem and its potential resolution to specific goals or metrics in your statement.
An effective problem statement often requires multiple iterations and refinements. Many project managers make the mistake of treating their first draft as the final version, missing opportunities to improve clarity, precision and impact.
To overcome this challenge:
Being able to write problem statements is a valuable skill that can significantly enhance your problem-solving capabilities and drive meaningful change within your organization. They enable you to set the stage for innovative solutions and improved processes – but to do this, you’ll need to clearly articulate challenges, provide context and focus on measurable outcomes.
A well-crafted problem statement is a powerful tool for aligning teams, securing resources and guiding decision-making. It’s the foundation for effective problem-solving strategies. As you get better at writing problem statements, you’ll find that complex challenges become more manageable and your ability to drive positive change increases.
At Pip Decks, we’re passionate about equipping professionals with the tools and knowledge they need to excel in their roles. Whether you’re looking to improve your problem-solving skills, enhance team collaboration or develop your leadership abilities, you’ll find the answers you need in our expert-written card decks.
Join 100,000+ leaders who get unique tips every week on storytelling, leadership and productivity - plus exclusive how-to guides, first-dibs on upcoming Pip Decks and our very best discounts.
Check your inbox to confirm your email.
No spam, no email sharing - ever. Privacy Policy
One of the few newsletters I look forward to. — Dave Cunningham, Head of DesignOps @ NHS
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Scientific Reports volume 14 , Article number: 20234 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
This work examines the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli model, which finds its use in hydrodynamics. This model explains how water waves vary over time in hydrodynamics. We provide new explicit solutions to the generalized (2+1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli equation by applying the Sardar sub-equation technique. This method is shown to be a reliable and practical tool for solving nonlinear wave equations. Furthermore, different types of solitary wave solutions are constructed: w-shaped, breather waved, chirped, dark, bright, kink, unique, periodic, and more. The results obtained with the variable coefficient Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli equation are stable and different from previous methods. As compared to their constant-coefficient counterparts, the variable-coefficient models are more general here. In the current work, the problem is solved using the Sardar Sub-problem Technique to produce distinct soliton solutions with parameters. Plotting these graphs of the solutions will help you better comprehend the model. The outcomes demonstrate how well the method works to solve nonlinear partial differential equations, which are common in mathematical physics.With the help of this method, we may examine a variety of solutions from significant physical perspectives.
Introduction.
In the past few decades, the research of traveling wave solutions explored by researchers has gained considerable attention. It includes the solutions of non-linear partial differential equations (NPDEs) which play a key role in the study of non-linear physical phenomena arising in many fields of engineering and sciences i.e., mathematical physics 1 , technical arena 2 , plasma physics 3 , ocean engineering 4 , tsunami waves 5 , etc. NPDEs have great potential for applications in various fields, therefore, these equations have the advantage of getting the special attention of researchers to find their analytical and numerical solutions. In recent times, many researchers in mathematics and physics have established various methods of constructing and analyzing exact traveling wave solutions of different non-linear problems such as Hirota’s bilinear transformation method 6 , 7 , 8 , the extended Exp-expansion method 9 , the new extended direct algebraic method 10 , the variational iteration method 11 , the semi-inverse variational principle 12 , the generalized Kudryashov technique 13 , the sine-Gordon method 14 , the Cole-Hopf transformation method 15 , the Adomian decomposition method 16 , the traveling wave scheme 17 , A special kind of distributive product 18 , the B \(\ddot{a}\) cklund transformation method 19 .
Solitons are the fascinating aspect of nonlinear physical events. The solitonic concept is accessible due to ethical balance and nonlinearity of concentration. Many scholars have conducted studies on solitary wave solutions as mentioned above.
Recently, an effective method has been introduced, called the Sardar sub-equation technique (SSET) 20 . Our primary emphasis is developing various wave soliton solutions, such as bright, singular, dark-bright, kink, dark, w-shaped, chirped, breather wave, and periodic wave solitons. The method under consideration is more universal than the others listed above. Similarly, these findings help us recognize the dynamic performance of various physical configurations. Furthermore, these results are positive, unique, and precise, and they may help illuminate particular non-linear natural phenomena in non-linear mathematical models.
This work has a few obvious limitations, such as the that it is usually only appropriate for a specific class of nonlinear PDEs,it might not be able to solve more complex equations, it might struggle with highly nonlinear terms,the solution it does provide may take particular forms, it frequently yields solutions under specific conditions, it frequently calls for the use of symbolic computational tools, it can be difficult to incorporate initial and boundary conditions into this method, the solutions it produces sometimes be non-trivial, and there may be easier solutions available.
In this work, the following coupled system of (2+1)-Dimensional Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli (BLP) equations 21 has been taken into consideration.
which was initially introduced by Boiti et al. 22 . Many mathematicians studied this system and developed precise explicit solutions using various methods. The Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli equation has drawn a lot of attention from researchers in the past ten years since it is used to explain the wave propagation of incompressible fluids in plasma physics, fluid dynamics, ocean engineering, astrophysics, and aerodynamics.More relevant material can also be studied in 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 .
Wazwaz and Mehanna’s precise traveling wave system suggestions of the system ( 1 ). System ( 1 )’s lump-type solutions, Lie point symmetries, and some precise answers to some other algebraic equations with new optical, lump wave, breather, periodic, and other multi-wave solutions can also be found with some additional precise solutions to the Eq. ( 1 ). There are some novel traveling wave system solutions of ( 1 ) that are provided in this article. Some other novel exact traveling wave solutions were presented in 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 .
It is a crucial system for describing how the horizontal velocity component of waves in an infinitely narrow channel with constant depth changes over time. The horizontal velocity and height of the water wave are related to the velocity components U ( x , y , t ) and V ( x , y , t ), respectively. Eq. ( 1 ) is a member of a group of equations that explain how water waves move through channels with a constant depth. The Sinh-Gordon equation can be generalized as the (2+1)-Dimensional equation in Eq. ( 1 ), and it can be transformed into the (anti)-Burgers equations, for example, in Mu et al. 35 , the model was taken into account using Hamiltonians, the Bäcklund transform, Lax Pair, and the Painlevé integrability.
More related research work can also be studied in this regard e.g., 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 .
The terms “horizontal velocity” and “height” relate to two essential characteristics that characterize the motion of water waves. The pace at which individual water particles move horizontally during the propagation of a wave is known as the horizontal wave velocity. The motion of the water particles in a wave is either elliptical or circular. This motion in the direction of wave propagation is composed of the horizontal velocity. It shows the rate at which the wave is propagating laterally. Both the vertical and horizontal components of the particle motion affect the wave’s real speed. While, the vertical distance between a water wave’s highest point, the crest, and its lowest point, the trough, determines the height of the wave. An indicator of a water wave’s energy is its height. Greater heights and energy are carried by larger waves. The amplitude of the wave, or the maximum displacement of the water particles from their undisturbed position, is correlated with the wave’s height. The wave’s energy is determined by its amplitude. To comprehend and forecast wave behavior, a water wave’s height and horizontal velocity work together. Wind speed, water depth, and the distance at which the wind has blown are some variables that affect them. An understanding of these factors is essential in disciplines like marine science, coastal engineering, and oceanography. This work is novel in itself that has not been done before. We can take this work so far till we are able to present these specific solitons/solutions in the form of physical interpretations.
The soliton-type solutions provided in this paper are beneficial for those who are physically related to it. These solutions can be applied in a variety of situations. Regarding its all-purpose applications, nevertheless, a few of these solutions can be useful to all physicists working in the field of soliton solutions for PDEs. Even though we have offered many solutions. Furthermore, since we have found the exact solutions in the absence of auxiliary data, there are infinitely many solutions. Since we haven’t connected the problem to any initial or boundary conditions, the physicist must determine which solution best fits the available information.
Using SSET, the following traveling wave transformation is used to create strong and authentic solitons of the BLP system
Here c is the real constant to be determined. Applying Eq. ( 2 ) in Eq. ( 1 ) to get the following form of ODE (ordinary differential equation) of the given system
By integrating and assembling the above system, we can write the following equation as
This will lead us to the exact solutions of the given BLP system. Moreover, some general insights or constraints of the equations which are worth mentioning here are its boundary conditions, nature of the equation and, its stability analysis.
This thorough and straightforward method is used by many experts to discover solitons and other wave solutions to the given issue. This technique can provide precise responses for a class of NPDEs. The given system of equations can be included by following the procedures below.
Step I: Considering the NPDE as follows
where \(P=P(x,t)\) is the unknown function, O is a polynomial of P ( x , t ) and its derivatives with respect to x and t . Now applying the traveling wave transformation
where \(\alpha\) , and \(\beta\) are the unknown constants to be determined later.
Using the above transformation, Eq. ( 5 ) is converted to the following ODE (ordinary differential equation),
where Q is the function of \(\Psi (\eta )\) and its derivatives and its superscripts designate ordinary derivatives w.r.t \(\eta\)
Step II: Solution of Eq. ( 7 ) is then formulated as
where \(c_n(0\le n\le N)\) are real constants and \(M(\eta )\) satisfies the ODE of the following form
Here \(\mu\) and \(\nu\) are real constants and Eq. ( 9 ) presents the following solutions:
If \(\nu >0\) and \(\mu =0\) , then
If \(\nu <0\) and \(\mu =0\) , then
If \(\nu <0\) and \(\mu =\frac{\nu ^2}{4}\) , then
If \(\nu >0\) and \(\mu =\frac{\nu ^2}{4}\) , then
The above listed functions are the generalized forms of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with parameters p and q . If we take the values of p and q to be 1, then the above functions become known functions.
Step III: By balancing the capital, we can determine the number N . Using this value of N , we get an algebraic equation in the shape of \(M^n(\eta )\) by substituting Eq. ( 8 ) into Eq. ( 7 ), which we balance by setting the powers of \(M^n(\eta ),\,n=(0,1,2,\ldots )\) to zero, resulting in a set of algebraic equations.
Step IV: This system of equations provides the necessary inputs and the precise answer to the provided equation.
The traveling wave solution to the Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli System is created in this part using SSET. Using homogeneous balance principle, we balance the equations \(U''\) and \(U^3\) to get the value of N and found to be 1.
Equation ( 8 ) is reduced by the equilibrium formula into
where \(a_0\) and \(a_1\) are the constants to determine. Substituting Eq. ( 14 ), Eq. ( 4 ) into Eq. ( 9 ) to get a polynomial in the form of \(T^n(\eta )\) . Equating the powers of \(T^n(\eta ),\,(n=0,1,2,3)\) to zero to get the algebraic equations in the form of \(a_0, a_1, \nu\) and \(\mu\) .
The system of equations is as
We discovered the following results by analyzing the above system of equations
Using these values in Eqs. ( 9 ),( 14 ) and ( 17 ) along with Eq. ( 2 ), we summarized the results for functions U along with their corresponding V as follows:
If \(u>0\) and \(\xi =0\) , then
In summary, the constraints of the above equations include:
\(u>0\) and \(\xi =0\) (parameter u must be a positive real number).
\(pq<0\) to ensure the square root term is real for \(U_1, V_1\) and, \(V_2\) and, \(pq>0\) to ensure the square root term is real for \(U_2\) .
If \(u<0\) , and \(\xi =0\) , then
In summary, the constraints of the above equations are:
\(u<0\) and \(\xi =0\) (parameter u must be a negative real number).
\(pq>0\) to ensure the square root term is real for all \(U_3, U_4, V_3\) and \(V_4\) .
\(\cos _{pq}(\sqrt{-u}\,\eta )\ne 0\) (to avoid division by zero in the denominator of \(V_3\) ).
If \(u<0\) and \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) , then
In summary, the constraints of the above equations are given below:
\(u<0\) and \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) (parameter u must be a negative real number).
pq should be defined appropriately for the hyperbolic tangent, cotangent, secant and cosecant functions.
The expression should be well-defined for the given values of \(\sqrt{\frac{-\mu }{2}}\,\eta\) and, \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) .
If \(u>0\) and \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) , then
\(u>0\) and \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) (parameter u must be a positive real number).
pq should be defined appropriately for the tangent, cotangent, secant and cosecant functions.
The expression should be well-defined for the given values of \(\sqrt{\frac{\mu }{2}}\,\eta\) and, \(\xi =\frac{u^2}{4}\) .
Various types of solitons are shown below, each displaying the graphical behavior of the solution to the issue mentioned above.
Above plottings are associated to Case I function U.
Graphical representation of function V Case I.
Plots associated to Case II function U.
Graphing of exact solutions linked with Case II function V.
Plots representing Case III function U.
Surface and contour plots representing Case III function V.
Representation of exact solutions of Case IV function U.
Plots signifying Case IV function V.
The parameters used to generate these figures are listed below.
The surface and contour plots of each solution using each condition stated in the technique are shown in the graphs above where Fig. 1 shows breather wave singular solitonic behavior of U of the given coupled system using the conditions in case I represented in Eq. ( 19 ), Fig. 2 shows the surface and contour plots of V like rogue wave (singular) solitons represented in Eq. ( 19 ) of the same case I, Fig. 3 represents the surface and contour plots showing w-shaped dark-bright solitons in the form of U using the condition given in case II represented in Eq. ( 21 ), Fig. 4 signifies the surface and contour plots representing periodic function solitons in the form of V represented in Eq. ( 21 ) of the same case II, Fig. 5 shows the plots as kink soliton type behavior of U of the given system of equations represented in Eq. ( 23 ) under conditions of case III, Fig. 6 displays the surface and contour plots signifying kink solitons with non-topological (bright) background in the form of V of Eq. ( 23 ) of the same case III, Fig. 7 represents the surface and contour plots of chirped periodic solitons of U represented in Eq. ( 25 ) under condition of case IV, Fig. 8 signifies the surface and contour plots representing dark-bright solitons in the form of V of the given system represented in Eq. ( 25 ) of the same case IV.
Discovering NPDE solutions is critical for comprehending the underlying physical processes. Solitons are important in mathematics and physics because they keep their shape and velocity constant while propagating. The modulation instability of the carrier wave train requires distinguishing between topological (dark) and non-topological (bright) solitons. Topological solitons occur when the carrier wave is unsustainable due to long-wave modulations, whereas non-topological solitons occur when the carrier wave is modulationally consistent.
Rogue waves, often known as freakish or killer waves, have progressed from maritime folklore to a recognized phenomenon. These waves, which are twice the magnitude of the surrounding waves, are unpredictable and frequently appear from other directions than the current wind and waves. The study of rogue waves advances our understanding of extraordinary phenomena in fluid dynamics.
This article presents new and interesting optical soliton solutions to the (2+1)-Dimensional Coupled System of the BLP equations using the analytical method of SSET. Our main goal in writing this article is to assess the BLP system using this methodology for the first time. This is a relatively new method that yields several new soliton solutions for the system being studied. The method is incredibly effective and easy to use. The results are given as hyperbolic, rational, and trigonometric functions. As we can see, this method provides a powerful, efficient, and simple tool for solving a range of nonlinear PDEs that are included in many models in the fields of natural science and engineering. The results may have practical applications and explain water waves in domains such as optics, linked circuits, elastic rods, shallow water with long wavelengths, and marine engineering. Lastly, 3D and contour plots of these solutions are produced using Maple. Bright, dark, periodic, chirped, breather-waved, singular, w-shaped, and breather-waved solitons are the results of this approach. We have investigated the forms and directions of the different solitons using the generated graphs.
As we all know, in the field of integrable systems, there is no general method to solve the analytical solution of NPDEs. The symbol calculation method based on neural networks proposed by Zhang et al. (see, 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ) open up a general symbolic computing path for the analytic solution of NPDEs, and lays the foundation for the universal method of symbolic calculation of analytical expression. The problems studied in this paper can be solved by using this method in future work.
This work is novel in itself. Within the framework of analytical solutions, researchers can choose our solution for numerical analysis. This methodology distinguishes itself from other ways by providing a systematic approach, comprehensive applicability, efficiency and brevity, the generation of many solutions, the reduction of equations to simpler ones, and integration with other techniques.
The graphs in this article were created using the settings listed below.
Figure 1 : \(c=2; u=2.5; p=1; q=-0.09; y=1.\)
Figure 2 : \(c=2; u=-2.5; p=1; q=-0.09; y=1.\)
Figure 3 : \(c=2; u=-1.5; p=2; q=1; y=2.\)
Figure 4 : \(c=-5; u=2.5; p=1; q=-0.09; y=5.\)
Figure 5 : \(c=2; u=2.5; p=0.8; q=-0.09; y=1.\)
Figure 6 : \(c=2; u=-2.5; p=1; q=-0.09; y=1.\)
Figure 7 : \(c=2; u=-5.5; p=2; q=1; y=2.\)
Figure 8 : \(c=-5; u=2.5; p=1; q=0.09; y=5.\)
Data will be provided by corresponding author on reasonable request.
Hoque, M. F., & Ali-Akbar, M. New extended \((g/g)\) -expansion method for traveling wave solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (npdes) in mathematical physics. Italian J. Pure Appl. Math. , 33:175–190, 2014.
Stephan, D., DuBay, K., Currey, G., Rider, T., Zobrist, M. & Bradley, P. Epa’s new technical guidance for national pollutant discharge elimination system (npdes) watershed-based permitting. In WEFTEC 2007 , pp 8169–8184. Water Environment Federation, 2007.
Saha Ray, S. Lie symmetry analysis, symmetry reductions with exact solutions, and conservation laws of (2+ 1)-dimensional bogoyavlenskii-schieff equation of higher order in plasma physics. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 43 (9), 5850–5859 (2020).
Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
Tukur, A. S., Abdullahi, Y., Ali, S. A. & Dumitru, B. Wave solutions to the more general (2+ 1)-dimensional boussinesq equation arising in ocean engineering. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2350214 (2023).
Sibel, T., Karmina, K. A., Resat, Y. & Abdullahi, Y. New behavior of tsunami and tidal oscillations for long-and short-wave interaction systems. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 36 (23), 2250116 (2022).
Zhang, R. F. & Li, M. C. Bilinear residual network method for solving the exactly explicit solutions of nonlinear evolution equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 108 (1), 521–531 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Zhang, R. F. & Bilige, S. Bilinear neural network method to obtain the exact analytical solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations and its application to p-gbkp equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 95 , 3041–3048 (2019).
Zhang, R. F., Li, M. C. & Yin, H. M. Rogue wave solutions and the bright and dark solitons of the (3+ 1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation. Nonlinear Dyn. 103 , 1071–1079 (2021).
Sidra, G., Jorge, E. M. D., Muhammad, S. I. & Nauman, A. Traveling-wave solutions for a nonlinear non-ohmic cardioelectrophysiological tissue conduction cable equation. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 46 (12), 12690–12710 (2023).
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Sidra, G. et al . Exact and solitary wave structure of the tumor cell proliferation with lq model of three dimensional PDE by newly extended direct algebraic method. AIP Adv. 13 (12) (2023).
He, J. H. Variational iteration method some recent results and new interpretations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 207 (1), 3–17 (2007).
Alzahrani, A. K. & Belic, M.R. Cubic-quartic optical soliton perturbation with lakshmanan-porsezian-daniel model by semi-inverse variational principle. Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 22 , 123 (2021).
Ghazanfar, S. et al. Imaging ultrasound propagation using the Westervelt equation by the generalized Kudryashov and modified kudryashov methods. Appl. Sci. 12 (22), 11813 (2022).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ablowitz, M. J., Kaup, D. J., Newell, A. C. & Segur, H. Method for solving the sine-gordon equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (25), 1262 (1973).
Wang, K. J. Diverse soliton solutions to the Fokas system via the Cole-Hopf transformation. Optik 272 , 170250 (2023).
Wazwaz, A. M. A reliable modification of adomian decomposition method. Appl. Math. Comput. 102 (1), 77–86 (1999).
MathSciNet Google Scholar
Mahmoud, G. et al . Traveling-wave-based fault-location scheme for multiend-aged underground cable system. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 22 (1), 82–89 (2006).
Xiao, A. et al . A web-based distributed product realization environment. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference , vol. 80210, pp. 979–991. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001.
Iqbal, M. S., Inc, M., Ghazanfar, S. & Ahmed, N. Existence and regularity of shock-effected solitons for nonlinear problems in electro-cardiac-physiology. Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolut. Inf. Process. 21 (02), 2250053 (2023).
Asjad, M. I. et al. Traveling wave solutions to the Boussinesq equation via sardar sub-equation technique. AIMS Math. 7 (6), 11134–11149 (2022).
Aghdaei, M. F. & Heris, J. M. Exact solutions of the couple Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli system by the generalized ( \(g_0/g\) )-expansion method. J. Math. Extens. (2011).
Sirisubtawee, S. & Koonprasert, S. Exact traveling wave solutions of certain nonlinear partial differential equations using the-expansion method. Adv. Math. Phys. (2018).
Baskonus, H. M. et al . On pulse propagation of soliton wave solutions related to the perturbed Chen–Lee–Liu equation in an optical fiber. Opt. Quantum Electron. 53 , 1–17 (2021).
Yasin, S., Khan, A., Ahmad, S. & Osman, M. S. New exact solutions of (3+ 1)-dimensional modified KdV-Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation by Sardar-subequation method. Opt. Quantum Electron. 56 (1), 90 (2024).
Abdel-Gawad, H. I. & Osman, M. S. On the variational approach for analyzing the stability of solutions of evolution equations. Kyungpook Math. J. 53 (4), 661–680 (2013).
Abdel-Gawad, H. I. & Osman, M. Exact solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation with space and time dependent coefficients by the extended unified method. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 45 , 1–12 (2014).
Tariq, K. U., Younis, M., Rezazadeh, H., Rizvi, S. T. R. & Osman, M.S. Optical solitons with quadratic–cubic nonlinearity and fractional temporal evolution. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 32 (26), 1850317 (2018).
Qureshi, S. et al. A new adaptive nonlinear numerical method for singular and stiff differential problems. Alexandria Eng. J. 74 , 585–597 (2023).
Ismael, H. F. et al. Geometrical patterns of time variable Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (i) equation that models dynamics of waves in thin films with high surface tension. Nonlinear Dyn. 111 (10), 9457–9466 (2023).
Rasid, Md. M. et al . Further advanced investigation of the complex Hirota-dynamical model to extract soliton solutions. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2450074 (2023).
Gu, Y., Manafian, J., Malmir, S., Eslami, B. & Ilhan, O. A. Lump, lump-trigonometric, breather waves, periodic wave and multi-waves solutions for a konopelchenko–dubrovsky equation arising in fluid dynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 37 (15), 2350141 (2023).
Yongyi, G. & Aminakbari, N. Bernoulli (g’/g)-expansion method for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with third-order dispersion. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 36 (11), 2250028 (2022).
Yongyi, G. & Aminakbari, N. New optical soliton solutions for the variable coefficients nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Opt. Quantum Electron. 54 (4), 255 (2022).
Yongyi, G., Yuan, W., Aminakbari, N. & Lin, J. Meromorphic solutions of some algebraic differential equations related Painlevé equation iv and its applications. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41 (10), 3832–3840 (2018).
Gui, M., Dai, Z. & Zhao, Z. Localized structures for (2+ 1)-dimensional Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli equation. Pramana 81 , 367–376 (2013).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Behera, S. & Virdi, J. P. S. Some more solitary traveling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations. Discontinuity Nonlinearity Complexity 12 (01), 75–85 (2023).
Behera, S. Analysis of traveling wave solutions of two space-time nonlinear fractional differential equations by the first-integral method. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 38 (04), 2350247 (2024).
Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
Behera, S. & Aljahdaly, N. H. Nonlinear evolution equations and their traveling wave solutions in fluid media by modified analytical method. Pramana 97 (3), 130 (2023).
Behera, S., Mohanty, S. & Virdi, J. P. S. Analytical solutions and mathematical simulation of traveling wave solutions to fractional order nonlinear equations. Partial Diff. Equ. Appl. Math. 8 , 100535 (2023).
Google Scholar
Behera, S. & Aljahdaly, N. H. Soliton solutions of nonlinear geophysical KdV equation via two analytical methods. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63 (5), 107 (2024).
Behera, S. Optical solitons for the Hirota–Ramani equation via improved g’ g-expansion method. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2450403 (2024).
Zhang, R. F., Li, M. C., Gan, J. Y., Li, Q. & Lan, Z. Z. Novel trial functions and rogue waves of generalized breaking soliton equation via bilinear neural network method. Chaos Solitons Fractals 154 , 111692 (2022).
Zhang, R. F., Li, M. C., Albishari, M., Zheng, F. C. & Lan, Z. Z. Generalized lump solutions, classical lump solutions and rogue waves of the (2+ 1)-dimensional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Kotera-Sawada-like equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 403 , 126201 (2021).
Zhang, R. F., Li, M. C., Cherraf, A. & Vadyala, S. R. The interference wave and the bright and dark soliton for two integro-differential equation by using bnnm. Nonlinear Dyn. 111 (9), 8637–8646 (2023).
Zhang, R. F., Bilige, S., Liu, J. G. & Li, M. Bright-dark solitons and interaction phenomenon for p-gBKP equation by using bilinear neural network method. Physica Scripta 96 (2), 025224 (2020).
Download references
This research is funded by “Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R733), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Sidra Ghazanfar & Nauman Ahmed
Department of Academic Affairs, School of Leadership and Business, Oryx Universal College With Liverpool John Moores University (UK), 12253, Doha, Qatar
Muhammad Sajid Iqbal
Department of Humanities and Basic Science, MCS, NUST, Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science,, King Saud University, P.O. BOX 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Syed Mansoor Ali
Department of Mathematics, Art and Science Faculty, Siirt University, 56100, Siirt, Turkey
Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
Nauman Ahmed
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Shah Muhammad
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, SYK, England
Mubasher Ali
Department of Mathematics, Ghazni University, Ghazni, Afghanistan
Murad Khan Hassani
Department of Computer Engineering, Biruni University, 34010, Topkapı Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Mathematics, Near East Unive99138,rsity, Mathematics Research Center, 99138, Near East Boulevard, Nicosia /Mersin 10, Turkey
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
S.G. and N.A. and M.S.I. and S.M.A. wrote the main manuscript text and A.A. and S.M. and M.A. and M.K.H. prepared Figs. 1-8. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to Murad Khan Hassani .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Ghazanfar, S., Ahmed, N., Iqbal, M.S. et al. Analysis of multi-wave solitary solutions of (2+1)-dimensional coupled system of Boiti–Leon–Pempinelli. Sci Rep 14 , 20234 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67698-z
Download citation
Received : 28 May 2024
Accepted : 15 July 2024
Published : 30 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67698-z
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Three Styles of Problem-Solving. Another method of looking at types like these reduces them to just three different problem-solvers: Intuitive; Inconsistent; Systematic; Clearly, from the names alone, there is some overlap with the first type system. But this second way of looking at things is perhaps a bit more critical.
The problem-solving process typically includes the following steps: Identify the issue: Recognize the problem that needs to be solved. Analyze the situation: Examine the issue in depth, gather all relevant information, and consider any limitations or constraints that may be present. Generate potential solutions: Brainstorm a list of possible ...
In insight problem-solving, the cognitive processes that help you solve a problem happen outside your conscious awareness. 4. Working backward. Working backward is a problem-solving approach often ...
7. Solution evaluation. 1. Problem identification. The first stage of any problem solving process is to identify the problem (s) you need to solve. This often looks like using group discussions and activities to help a group surface and effectively articulate the challenges they're facing and wish to resolve.
Problem-solving is a mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue. The best strategy for solving a problem depends largely on the unique situation. In some cases, people are better off learning everything ...
Problem-solving is a vital skill for coping with various challenges in life. This webpage explains the different strategies and obstacles that can affect how you solve problems, and offers tips on how to improve your problem-solving skills. Learn how to identify, analyze, and overcome problems with Verywell Mind.
The 7 steps to problem-solving. When it comes to problem-solving there are seven key steps that you should follow: define the problem, disaggregate, prioritize problem branches, create an analysis plan, conduct analysis, synthesis, and communication. 1. Define the problem. Problem-solving begins with a clear understanding of the issue at hand.
Finding a suitable solution for issues can be accomplished by following the basic four-step problem-solving process and methodology outlined below. Step. Characteristics. 1. Define the problem. Differentiate fact from opinion. Specify underlying causes. Consult each faction involved for information. State the problem specifically.
Here are the seven steps of the rational approach: Define the problem. Identify possible causes. Brainstorm options to solve the problem. Select an option. Create an implementation plan. Execute the plan and monitor the results. Evaluate the solution. Read more: Effective Problem Solving Steps in the Workplace.
Defer or suspend judgement. Focus on "Yes, and…" rather than "No, but…". According to Carella, "Creative problem solving is the mental process used for generating innovative and imaginative ideas as a solution to a problem or a challenge. Creative problem solving techniques can be pursued by individuals or groups.".
The general problem solving definition is the use of ideas, skills, or facts to achieve the solution to a problem so a desired outcome can be reached. One example of problem solving could the ...
2. Break the problem down. Identifying the problem allows you to see which steps need to be taken to solve it. First, break the problem down into achievable blocks. Then, use strategic planning to set a time frame in which to solve the problem and establish a timeline for the completion of each stage. 3.
Problem solving is the process of achieving a goal by overcoming obstacles, a frequent part of most activities. Problems in need of solutions range from simple personal tasks (e.g. how to turn on an appliance) to complex issues in business and technical fields. ... There are two different types of problems: ill-defined and well-defined ...
17 Effective Problem-Solving Strategies. Effective problem-solving strategies include breaking the problem into smaller parts, brainstorming multiple solutions, evaluating the pros and cons of each, and choosing the most viable option. Critical thinking and creativity are essential in developing innovative solutions.
4 steps to better problem solving. While it might be tempting to dive into a problem head first, take the time to move step by step. Here's how you can effectively break down the problem-solving process with your team: 1. Identify the problem that needs to be solved. One of the easiest ways to identify a problem is to ask questions.
14 types of problem-solving strategies. Here are some examples of problem-solving strategies you can practice using to see which works best for you in different situations: 1. Define the problem. Taking the time to define a potential challenge can help you identify certain elements to create a plan to resolve them.
3 types of problem-solving models There are several creative models for solving problems in the workplace. The type of model you choose typically depends on the specific situation. Choosing a model that closely aligns with the issue you want to resolve is best. Here are three types of problem-solving models and techniques: Trial and error
Problem-Solving Skills Definition. Problem-solving skills are the ability to identify problems, brainstorm and analyze answers, and implement the best solutions. An employee with good problem-solving skills is both a self-starter and a collaborative teammate; they are proactive in understanding the root of a problem and work with others to ...
Although problem-solving is a skill in its own right, a subset of seven skills can help make the process of problem-solving easier. These include analysis, communication, emotional intelligence, resilience, creativity, adaptability, and teamwork. 1. Analysis. As a manager, you'll solve each problem by assessing the situation first.
How to Solve Problems. To bring the best ideas forward, teams must build psychological safety. Teams today aren't just asked to execute tasks: They're called upon to solve problems. You'd ...
3. You're either competitively oriented, focused on being the best, or collaboratively oriented, focused on working together. In the U.S., in particular, we are constantly fed messages that ...
The problem solving tools include three unique categories: problem solving diagrams, problem solving mind maps, and problem solving software solutions. They include: ... Not only is it versatile enough to use as your go-to system for puzzling out all types of workplace problems, MindManager's built-in forecasting tools, timeline charts, and ...
An effective problem statement frames the issue in a way that facilitates a deeper understanding and guides the problem-solving process. At its core, a well-crafted problem statement should capture the essence of the challenge at hand, providing enough context for stakeholders to grasp the issue's significance.
This method is shown to be a reliable and practical tool for solving nonlinear wave equations. ... different types of solitary wave solutions are constructed: w-shaped, breather waved, chirped ...
When employers talk about problem-solving skills, they are often referring to the ability to handle difficult or unexpected situations in the workplace as well as complex business challenges. Organizations rely on people who can assess both kinds of situations and calmly identify solutions. Problem-solving skills are traits that enable you to ...