Operation
Meaning
strictly less than
less than or equal
strictly greater than
greater than or equal
equal
not equal
object identity
not
negated object identity
The first six of these operators are familiar from mathematics:
Note that = and == have very different meanings. The former is the assignment operator, and the latter is the equality operator:
Python allows you to chain comparison operators to create “compound” comparisons:
Whereas == checks to see if two objects have the same value, the is operator checks to see if two objects are actually the same object. For example, creating two lists with the same contents produces two distinct lists, that have the same “value”:
Thus the is operator is most commonly used to check if a variable references the None object, or either of the boolean objects:
Use is not to check if two objects are distinct:
Recall that the two boolean objects True and False formally belong to the int type in addition to bool , and are associated with the values 1 and 0 , respectively:
Likewise Python ascribes boolean values to non-boolean objects. For example,the number 0 is associated with False and non-zero numbers are associated with True . The boolean values of built-in objects can be evaluated with the built-in Python command bool :
and non-zero Python integers are associated with True :
The following built-in Python objects evaluate to False via bool :
Zero of any numeric type: 0 , 0.0 , 0j
Any empty sequence, such as an empty string or list: '' , tuple() , [] , numpy.array([])
Empty dictionaries and sets
Thus non-zero numbers and non-empty sequences/collections evaluate to True via bool .
The bool function allows you to evaluate the boolean values ascribed to various non-boolean objects. For instance, bool([]) returns False wherease bool([1, 2]) returns True .
We now introduce the simple, but powerful if , else , and elif conditional statements. This will allow us to create simple branches in our code. For instance, suppose you are writing code for a video game, and you want to update a character’s status based on her/his number of health-points (an integer). The following code is representative of this:
Each if , elif , and else statement must end in a colon character, and the body of each of these statements is delimited by whitespace .
The following pseudo-code demonstrates the general template for conditional statements:
In practice this can look like:
In its simplest form, a conditional statement requires only an if clause. else and elif clauses can only follow an if clause.
Similarly, conditional statements can have an if and an else without an elif :
Conditional statements can also have an if and an elif without an else :
Note that only one code block within a single if-elif-else statement can be executed: either the “if-block” is executed, or an “elif-block” is executed, or the “else-block” is executed. Consecutive if-statements, however, are completely independent of one another, and thus their code blocks can be executed in sequence, if their respective conditional statements resolve to True .
Reading Comprehension: Conditional statements
Assume my_list is a list. Given the following code:
What will happen if my_list is [] ? Will IndexError be raised? What will first_item be?
Assume variable my_file is a string storing a filename, where a period denotes the end of the filename and the beginning of the file-type. Write code that extracts only the filename.
my_file will have at most one period in it. Accommodate cases where my_file does not include a file-type.
"code.py" \(\rightarrow\) "code"
"doc2.pdf" \(\rightarrow\) "doc2"
"hello_world" \(\rightarrow\) "hello_world"
Python supports a syntax for writing a restricted version of if-else statements in a single line. The following code:
can be written in a single line as:
This is suggestive of the general underlying syntax for inline if-else statements:
The inline if-else statement :
The expression A if <condition> else B returns A if bool(<condition>) evaluates to True , otherwise this expression will return B .
This syntax is highly restricted compared to the full “if-elif-else” expressions - no “elif” statement is permitted by this inline syntax, nor are multi-line code blocks within the if/else clauses.
Inline if-else statements can be used anywhere, not just on the right side of an assignment statement, and can be quite convenient:
We will see this syntax shine when we learn about comprehension statements. That being said, this syntax should be used judiciously. For example, inline if-else statements ought not be used in arithmetic expressions, for therein lies madness:
Armed with our newfound understanding of conditional statements, we briefly return to our discussion of Python’s logic expressions to discuss “short-circuiting”. In Python, a logical expression is evaluated from left to right and will return its boolean value as soon as it is unambiguously determined, leaving any remaining portions of the expression unevaluated . That is, the expression may be short-circuited .
For example, consider the fact that an and operation will only return True if both of its arguments evaluate to True . Thus the expression False and <anything> is guaranteed to return False ; furthermore, when executed, this expression will return False without having evaluated bool(<anything>) .
To demonstrate this behavior, consider the following example:
According to our discussion, the pattern False and short-circuits this expression without it ever evaluating bool(1/0) . Reversing the ordering of the arguments makes this clear.
In practice, short-circuiting can be leveraged in order to condense one’s code. Suppose a section of our code is processing a variable x , which may be either a number or a string . Suppose further that we want to process x in a special way if it is an all-uppercased string. The code
is problematic because isupper can only be called once we are sure that x is a string; this code will raise an error if x is a number. We could instead write
but the more elegant and concise way of handling the nestled checking is to leverage our ability to short-circuit logic expressions.
See, that if x is not a string, that isinstance(x, str) will return False ; thus isinstance(x, str) and x.isupper() will short-circuit and return False without ever evaluating bool(x.isupper()) . This is the preferable way to handle this sort of checking. This code is more concise and readable than the equivalent nested if-statements.
Reading Comprehension: short-circuited expressions
Consider the preceding example of short-circuiting, where we want to catch the case where x is an uppercased string. What is the “bug” in the following code? Why does this fail to utilize short-circuiting correctly?
Truth testing
Boolean operations
Comparisons
‘if’ statements
Conditional statements
If my_list is [] , then bool(my_list) will return False , and the code block will be skipped. Thus first_item will be None .
First, check to see if . is even contained in my_file . If it is, find its index-position, and slice the string up to that index. Otherwise, my_file is already the file name.
Short-circuited expressions
fails to account for the fact that expressions are always evaluated from left to right. That is, bool(x.isupper()) will always be evaluated first in this instance and will raise an error if x is not a string. Thus the following isinstance(x, str) statement is useless.
Python has a conditional expression (sometimes called a "ternary operator"). You can write operations like if statements in one line with conditional expressions.
If ... elif ... else ... by conditional expressions, list comprehensions and conditional expressions, lambda expressions and conditional expressions.
See the following article for if statements in Python.
In Python, the conditional expression is written as follows.
The condition is evaluated first. If condition is True , X is evaluated and its value is returned, and if condition is False , Y is evaluated and its value is returned.
If you want to switch the value based on a condition, simply use the desired values in the conditional expression.
If you want to switch between operations based on a condition, simply describe each corresponding expression in the conditional expression.
An expression that does not return a value (i.e., an expression that returns None ) is also acceptable in a conditional expression. Depending on the condition, either expression will be evaluated and executed.
The above example is equivalent to the following code written with an if statement.
You can also combine multiple conditions using logical operators such as and or or .
By combining conditional expressions, you can write an operation like if ... elif ... else ... in one line.
However, it is difficult to understand, so it may be better not to use it often.
The following two interpretations are possible, but the expression is processed as the first one.
In the sample code below, which includes three expressions, the first expression is interpreted like the second, rather than the third:
By using conditional expressions in list comprehensions, you can apply operations to the elements of the list based on the condition.
See the following article for details on list comprehensions.
Conditional expressions are also useful when you want to apply an operation similar to an if statement within lambda expressions.
In the example above, the lambda expression is assigned to a variable for convenience, but this is not recommended by PEP8.
Refer to the following article for more details on lambda expressions.
Related articles.
In both real life and programming, decision-making is crucial. We often face situations where we need to make choices, and based on those choices, we determine our next actions. Similarly, in programming, we encounter scenarios where we must make decisions to control the flow of our code.
Conditional statements in Python play a key role in determining the direction of program execution. Among these, If-Else statements are fundamental, providing a way to execute different blocks of code based on specific conditions. As the name suggests, If-Else statements offer two paths, allowing for different outcomes depending on the condition evaluated.
Types of Control Flow in Python
Python if else statement, python nested if statement, python elif, ternary statement | short hand if else statement.
The if statement is the most simple decision-making statement. It is used to decide whether a certain statement or block of statements will be executed or not.
Let’s look at the flow of code in the Python If statements.
Flowchart of Python if statement
Here, the condition after evaluation will be either true or false. if the statement accepts boolean values – if the value is true then it will execute the block of statements below it otherwise not.
As we know, Python uses indentation to identify a block. So the block under the Python if statements will be identified as shown in the below example:
As the condition present in the if statements in Python is false. So, the block below the if statement is executed.
The if statement alone tells us that if a condition is true it will execute a block of statements and if the condition is false it won’t. But if we want to do something else if the condition is false, we can use the else statement with the if statement Python to execute a block of code when the Python if condition is false.
Let’s look at the flow of code in an if else Python statement.
Example of python if else statement.
The block of code following the else if in Python, the statement is executed as the condition present in the if statement is false after calling the statement which is not in the block(without spaces).
In this example, we are using an Python else if statement in a list comprehension with the condition that if the element of the list is odd then its digit sum will be stored else not.
A nested if is an if statement that is the target of another if statement. Nested if statements mean an if statement inside another if statement.
Yes, Python allows us to nest if statements within if statements. i.e., we can place an if statement inside another if statement.
Flowchart of Python Nested if statement
In this example, we are showing nested if conditions in the code, All the If condition in Python will be executed one by one.
Here, a user can decide among multiple options. The if statements are executed from the top down.
As soon as one of the conditions controlling the if is true, the statement associated with that if is executed, and the rest of the ladder is bypassed. If none of the conditions is true, then the final “else” statement will be executed.
Let’s look at the flow of control in if-elif-else ladder:
Flowchart of if-elif-else ladder
In the example, we are showing single if in Python, multiple elif conditions, and single else condition.
Whenever there is only a single statement to be executed inside the if block then shorthand if can be used. The statement can be put on the same line as the if statement.
In the given example, we have a condition that if the number is less than 15, then further code will be executed.
This can be used to write the if-else statements in a single line where only one statement is needed in both the if and else blocks.
In the given example, we are printing True if the number is 15, or else it will print False.
Similar Reads:
What is the conditional statement of if-else.
The if-else statement in Python is used to control the flow of the program based on a condition. It has the following syntax: if condition: # Execute this block if condition is True else: # Execute this block if condition is False For example: x = 10 if x > 5: print("x is greater than 5") else: print("x is not greater than 5")
A single if condition can have at most one else statement. However, you can have multiple elif (else if) statements to check additional conditions if needed: x = 10 if x > 15: print("x is greater than 15") elif x > 5: print("x is greater than 5 but not greater than 15") else: print("x is 5 or less")
In Python, control statements are used to alter the flow of execution based on specific conditions or looping requirements. The main types of control statements are: Conditional statements : if , else , elif Looping statements : for , while Control flow statements : break , continue , pass , return
The two primary types of control statements in Python are: Conditional statements : Used to execute code based on certain conditions ( if , else , elif ). Looping statements : Used to execute code repeatedly until a condition is met ( for , while ).
No, control statements and conditional statements are not exactly the same. Conditional statements ( if , else , elif ) specifically deal with checking conditions and executing code based on whether those conditions are True or False . Control statements encompass a broader category that includes both conditional statements ( if , else , elif ) and looping statements ( for , while ), as well as other statements ( break , continue , pass , return ) that control the flow of execution in a program.
Similar reads.
If you're the site owner , contact your hosting provider., if you are a visitor , please check back soon..
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Get early access and see previews of new features.
Is it possible to have assignment in a condition?
Why not try it out?
Update: This is possible (with different syntax) in Python 3.8
Python 3.8 will bring in PEP572
Abstract This is a proposal for creating a way to assign to variables within an expression using the notation NAME := expr . A new exception, TargetScopeError is added, and there is one change to evaluation order.
https://lwn.net/Articles/757713/
The "PEP 572 mess" was the topic of a 2018 Python Language Summit session led by benevolent dictator for life (BDFL) Guido van Rossum. PEP 572 seeks to add assignment expressions (or "inline assignments") to the language, but it has seen a prolonged discussion over multiple huge threads on the python-dev mailing list—even after multiple rounds on python-ideas. Those threads were often contentious and were clearly voluminous to the point where many probably just tuned them out. At the summit, Van Rossum gave an overview of the feature proposal, which he seems inclined toward accepting, but he also wanted to discuss how to avoid this kind of thread explosion in the future.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/#examples-from-the-python-standard-library
Examples from the Python standard library site.py env_base is only used on these lines, putting its assignment on the if moves it as the "header" of the block. Current: env_base = os.environ.get("PYTHONUSERBASE", None) if env_base: return env_base Improved: if env_base := os.environ.get("PYTHONUSERBASE", None): return env_base _pydecimal.py Avoid nested if and remove one indentation level. Current: if self._is_special: ans = self._check_nans(context=context) if ans: return ans Improved: if self._is_special and (ans := self._check_nans(context=context)): return ans copy.py Code looks more regular and avoid multiple nested if. (See Appendix A for the origin of this example.) Current: reductor = dispatch_table.get(cls) if reductor: rv = reductor(x) else: reductor = getattr(x, "__reduce_ex__", None) if reductor: rv = reductor(4) else: reductor = getattr(x, "__reduce__", None) if reductor: rv = reductor() else: raise Error( "un(deep)copyable object of type %s" % cls) Improved: if reductor := dispatch_table.get(cls): rv = reductor(x) elif reductor := getattr(x, "__reduce_ex__", None): rv = reductor(4) elif reductor := getattr(x, "__reduce__", None): rv = reductor() else: raise Error("un(deep)copyable object of type %s" % cls) datetime.py tz is only used for s += tz, moving its assignment inside the if helps to show its scope. Current: s = _format_time(self._hour, self._minute, self._second, self._microsecond, timespec) tz = self._tzstr() if tz: s += tz return s Improved: s = _format_time(self._hour, self._minute, self._second, self._microsecond, timespec) if tz := self._tzstr(): s += tz return s sysconfig.py Calling fp.readline() in the while condition and calling .match() on the if lines make the code more compact without making it harder to understand. Current: while True: line = fp.readline() if not line: break m = define_rx.match(line) if m: n, v = m.group(1, 2) try: v = int(v) except ValueError: pass vars[n] = v else: m = undef_rx.match(line) if m: vars[m.group(1)] = 0 Improved: while line := fp.readline(): if m := define_rx.match(line): n, v = m.group(1, 2) try: v = int(v) except ValueError: pass vars[n] = v elif m := undef_rx.match(line): vars[m.group(1)] = 0 Simplifying list comprehensions A list comprehension can map and filter efficiently by capturing the condition: results = [(x, y, x/y) for x in input_data if (y := f(x)) > 0] Similarly, a subexpression can be reused within the main expression, by giving it a name on first use: stuff = [[y := f(x), x/y] for x in range(5)] Note that in both cases the variable y is bound in the containing scope (i.e. at the same level as results or stuff). Capturing condition values Assignment expressions can be used to good effect in the header of an if or while statement: # Loop-and-a-half while (command := input("> ")) != "quit": print("You entered:", command) # Capturing regular expression match objects # See, for instance, Lib/pydoc.py, which uses a multiline spelling # of this effect if match := re.search(pat, text): print("Found:", match.group(0)) # The same syntax chains nicely into 'elif' statements, unlike the # equivalent using assignment statements. elif match := re.search(otherpat, text): print("Alternate found:", match.group(0)) elif match := re.search(third, text): print("Fallback found:", match.group(0)) # Reading socket data until an empty string is returned while data := sock.recv(8192): print("Received data:", data) Particularly with the while loop, this can remove the need to have an infinite loop, an assignment, and a condition. It also creates a smooth parallel between a loop which simply uses a function call as its condition, and one which uses that as its condition but also uses the actual value. Fork An example from the low-level UNIX world: if pid := os.fork(): # Parent code else: # Child code
http://docs.python.org/tutorial/datastructures.html
Note that in Python, unlike C, assignment cannot occur inside expressions. C programmers may grumble about this, but it avoids a common class of problems encountered in C programs: typing = in an expression when == was intended.
http://effbot.org/pyfaq/why-can-t-i-use-an-assignment-in-an-expression.htm
Nope, the BDFL didn't like that feature.
From where I sit, Guido van Rossum, "Benevolent Dictator For Life”, has fought hard to keep Python as simple as it can be. We can quibble with some of the decisions he's made -- I'd have preferred he said 'No' more often. But the fact that there hasn't been a committee designing Python, but instead a trusted "advisory board", based largely on merit, filtering through one designer's sensibilities, has produced one hell of a nice language, IMHO.
Yes, but only from Python 3.8 and onwards.
PEP 572 proposes Assignment Expressions and has already been accepted.
Quoting the Syntax and semantics part of the PEP:
In your specific case, you will be able to write
Not directly, per this old recipe of mine -- but as the recipe says it's easy to build the semantic equivalent, e.g. if you need to transliterate directly from a C-coded reference algorithm (before refactoring to more-idiomatic Python, of course;-). I.e.:
BTW, a very idiomatic Pythonic form for your specific case, if you know exactly what falsish value somefunc may return when it does return a falsish value (e.g. 0 ), is
so in this specific case the refactoring would be pretty easy;-).
If the return could be any kind of falsish value (0, None , '' , ...), one possibility is:
but you might prefer a simple custom generator:
Thanks to Python 3.8 new feature it will be possible to do such a thing from this version, although not using = but Ada-like assignment operator := . Example from the docs:
No. Assignment in Python is a statement, not an expression.
You can define a function to do the assigning for you:
One of the reasons why assignments are illegal in conditions is that it's easier to make a mistake and assign True or False:
In Python 3 True and False are keywords, so no risk anymore.
The assignment operator - also known informally as the the walrus operator - was created at 28-Feb-2018 in PEP572 .
For the sake of completeness, I'll post the relevant parts so you can compare the differences between 3.7 and 3.8:
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests..., provide feedback.
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .
NPTEL Assignment Answers and Solutions 2024 (July-Dec). Get Answers of Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 for all courses. This guide offers clear and accurate answers for your all assignments across various NPTEL courses
Folders and files.
Name | Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
164 Commits | ||||
Nptel assignment answers 2024 with solutions (july-dec), how to use this repo to see nptel assignment answers and solutions 2024.
If you're here to find answers for specific NPTEL courses, follow these steps:
Access the Course Folder:
Locate the Weekly Assignment Files:
Select the Week File:
Review the Answers:
By following these steps, you can easily locate and use the assignment answers and solutions for the NPTEL courses provided in this repository. We hope this resource assists you in your studies!
Here's a list of courses currently available in this repository:
Note: This repository is intended for educational purposes only. Please use the provided answers as a guide to better understand the course material.
For any queries or support, feel free to reach out to us at [email protected] .
Stay updated with our latest content and updates by following us on our social media platforms!
Progiez is an online educational platform aimed at providing solutions to various online courses offered by NPTEL, Coursera, LinkedIn Learning, and more. Explore our resources for detailed answers and solutions to enhance your learning experience.
Disclaimer: This repository is intended for educational purposes only. All content is provided for reference and should not be submitted as your own work.
Full disclosure: I’m not sure this is a good idea (since it is seriously cryptic when you first encounter it, and hard to look up on your own), so I have precisely zero plans to pursue it any further myself. I do, however, find it to be an intriguing idea (prompted by this post in the PEP 736 discussion thread), so it seemed worth sharing in case someone else liked it enough to pick it up and run with it.
The core of the idea:
Handling different kinds of assignment targets:
Disallowed due to the potential for ambiguity:
Note that it isn’t that there’s no reasonable meaning for these (see the various comments about that later in the thread), it’s that the use cases for them are weak and they’d necessarily be harder to interpret than the simpler cases above. If they’re left out initially, it’s straightforward to add them later. If they’re included up front and are later found to be problematic, they’re hard to get rid of.
The mnemonic for remembering this use of the @ (“at”) symbol is the acronym “AT” for “Assignment Target”. Aside from the shared symbol, it has no connection to function decorators or matrix multiplication. As a style recommendation, it would be worth pointing out that combining assignment target references and the matrix multiplication operator in the same expression is intrinsically hard to read (due to the potential confusion between the two uses).
Edit: added a clarifying note to the list of arguably ambiguous targets
If this doesn’t comply with the presented idea, please disregard as off-topic.
I would find assignment targets useful in a for-loop where the assignment is implicit.
(I made-up the syntax).
The = @.lower() examples reminded me of the previous .= assignment discussion . Still not sure whether it would be a good idea, but the @ form is more general than the .= special case. Definitely intriguing …
I’d write that numlist = [num + 100 for num in numlist]
The more I think about it, the more I like it. The matrix multiplication thing does seem a bit of an issue though.
Also, I would consider allowing multiple targets on rightmost.
Given it can provide a significant decrease in verbosity, it would be a shame to not be able to take full advantage of it:
Or could specify which one (also, exclamation mark on its own looks pretty bad, adding a number to it makes it a bit better):
That’s semantically different, though, creating a new list instead of modifying an existing list.
I was pretty skeptical when I started reading, but the examples section really sold it to me!
So many of these are things I’ve had to do many times and shrugged about the verbosity.
Especially these:
(and similar)
Infact, the function call examples (PEP 736-like) seemed the least useful and intuitive to me, and I’m not quite sure I follow on how they’re consistent with the other assignment targets
The idea wouldn’t be useful in a regular for loop, but could reasonably be defined in comprehensions and generator expressions:
Less useful though, since it’s already acceptable style to use one letter iteration variable names in such cases.
I listed those separately because they’re genuinely different from the pure assignment case. Specifically, they’re looking up the given name in a different context from the one where the name is getting set.
Both tuple unpacking and multi-assigment could be allowed by having @ be a tuple in those cases.
My problem with that for multi-assigment is that it feels hard to remember (since rightmost and leftmost target remain plausible alternative meanings)
For tuple unpacking, the restriction could be limited to cases without star unpacking rather than all tuple targets, but it just doesn’t seem useful enough to justify that complexity.
I like the idea a lot, and I don’t quite see what can be potentially ambiguous about the two usages quoted above. The reversed example in particular makes the intent of the code that much more pronounced.
I do think that we should disallow mixed usage of matrix multiplication and the proposed assignment target reference as a special case though.
Maybe I’m missing something obvious, but I don’t even see what can be ambiguous about allowing a starred expression in the assignment targets, where the quoted example would intuitively translate into:
Also note that we should preserve the data types of tuples and/or lists in the assignment targets when evaluating them on the RHS:
This would be ambiguous if the function returns a value to an assignment target:
Meng Qinyuan
Aug 27, 2023
Hi @ncoghlan ,
Thanks for sharing this interesting idea! I think the use of @ to refer to assignment targets could be a neat feature, especially for scenarios where we need to reference the target itself, like in the examples with collections.NamedTuple and typing.NewType .
However, I do agree that the initial learning curve might be steep for newcomers, and the potential for confusion with existing uses of @ (decorators and matrix multiplication) is a concern.
It would be great to see more community feedback on this proposal, especially regarding the specific cases where it’s disallowed and how those could be handled differently.
Looking forward to seeing how this evolves!
MengQinyuan
It looks prety Perlish to me.
I’m not sure about this idea but I can see applications of it. One that comes up a lot in SymPy:
It is very easy to make a mistake with that and can easily cause bugs. This would be better:
Or maybe that is excluded because the assignment target is not an identifier…
My current summary of my own feelings: “Wow, that’s cool… I think I hate it”. Super useful (so it would get used), but super cryptic and not pretty to read (so I’d feel bad every time I used it, or saw someone else use it). I want to like it because of its utility and practicality, but the way it looks… ugh.
I only left out string forms for the non-identifier cases because I couldn’t think of a reasonable use case for them.
Defining it to be the literal source code target string regardless of the target kind wouldn’t be ambiguous though (and wouldn’t change the meaning for identifiers). That way APIs that accept comma separated strings that are expected to match the names of tuple assignment targets could be passed @'' as shown, while those that accept iterables could be passed @''.split(',') .
It would also strengthen the case for allowing @ for target tuples in general (since it would be odd if @'' was allowed, but @ wasn’t).
TensorFlow has the same design.
In my opinion, Jax solved this problem through better design. Instead of creating the symbols by binding a name, you do:
The decorator replaces the passed-in value x with a symbol x , produces the expression graph, compiles it, and then calls it with the passed-in arguments.
Similarly, SymPy could have been designed this way:
That is not a nice design for something that is often used interactively or in notebooks, short scripts etc. I guess jax has a more limited scope for how the symbols are used but needing to have all code in functions would be quite limiting for most SymPy users (including many who are not really “programmers” as such).
Other computer algebra systems often just allow symbols to be appear automagically without needing to be declared (which is both good and bad). Some like Matlab and Julia which are programming languages that have symbolic capability allow a nicer declaration something like:
Those languages could be extended to support this in a nicer way but Python can’t because it lacks macros and it would be considered out of scope for this sort of thing to be built in. The duplication in x, y = symbols('x, y') is of course not unique to SymPy and applies to the other situations mentioned in this thread as well which might equally be solved by macros in other languages.
Fair enough, I haven’t seen enough real life SymPy code to know.
Anyway, I think this usage in SymPy and similarly in (now-deprecated) type variables ( TypeVar ) is the most compelling use case to me. (Are there any other similar cases?)
The other examples seem to just illustrate how this features makes typing code easier, but reading code slightly harder (at least to my eyes). I think it should be the other way around: we should try to make reading code easier.
I’m going to heart this idea since I think it’s a worthwhile and interesting discussion even though I don’t think it would be a good addition.
This is way off topic, and I’m not trying to suggest how SymPy should be designed, but I’m surprised no-one has mentioned abusing sys._getframe(1).f_locals to have a function that sets variables in the parent frame. With that you could simply do something like
Part of it is the symbol @ itself, which is fine having that story of @ => AT => Assignment Target, but that is a story long to remember and one has to know it first.
An alternative is to use instead a keyword that reads in English as what is meant, such one can guess the meaning relying on knowledge that is more common.
I wouldn’t know which, for not knowing English enough: thesame , idem , ditto ?
Using the last one, for example, would turn
some.nested.attribute = @.lower()
some.nested.attribute = ditto.lower()
This has long existed but its use is discouraged because experience has shown that there are various ways that it can’t fully work:
File handling, python modules, python numpy, python pandas, python matplotlib, python scipy, machine learning, python mysql, python mongodb, python reference, module reference, python how to, python examples, python if else.
The else keyword catches anything which isn't caught by the preceding conditions.
In this example a is greater than b , so the first condition is not true, also the elif condition is not true, so we go to the else condition and print to screen that "a is greater than b".
You can also have an else without the elif :
If you want to use W3Schools services as an educational institution, team or enterprise, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
If you want to report an error, or if you want to make a suggestion, send us an e-mail: [email protected]
Top references, top examples, get certified.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
One should not use this approach if looping through large data sets since it introduces an unnecessary assignment in case we end up in the else-statement.
Python Conditional Assignment When you want to assign a value to a variable based on some condition, like if the condition is true then assign a value to the variable, else assign some other value to the variable, then you can use the conditional assignment operator.
In this step-by-step tutorial you'll learn how to work with conditional ("if") statements in Python. Master if-statements and see how to write complex decision making code in your programs.
Learn how to write a Python if statement in one line using either inline if/elif/else blocks or conditional expressions.
In computer programming, we use the if statement to run a block of code only when a specific condition is met. In this tutorial, we will learn about Python if...else statements with the help of examples.
In this article, we'll explore how to use if, else, and elif statements in Python, along with some examples of how to use them in practice.
Learn how to use python if else statement in one line using ternary operator. You can also hack your way to use nested if else or if elif else in single line
Python One-Liners will teach you how to read and write "one-liners": concise statements of useful functionality packed into a single line of code. You'll learn how to systematically unpack and understand any line of Python code, and write eloquent, powerfully compressed Python like an expert.
Python uses the if, elif, and else conditions to implement the decision control. Learn if, elif, and else condition using simple and quick examples.
If you're trying to learn Python, you need to practice! These ten if-else Python practice problems provide you some hands-on experience. And don't worry - we've provided full code solutions and detailed explanations!
Inline if-else statements Python supports a syntax for writing a restricted version of if-else statements in a single line. The following code: num = 2 if num >= 0: sign = "positive" else: sign = "negative"
Python has a conditional expression (sometimes called a "ternary operator"). You can write operations like if statements in one line with conditional expressions.
Learn how If-Else Statements control code flow, create dynamic programs, and unlock Python's full potential. Dive into clear examples and expert guide.
12 Python if else Exercises for Beginners One of the basic concepts of Python is the if else statement, which allows you to execute different blocks of code depending on some conditions. In this article, we will learn how to use the if-else statement in Python and practice some exercises for beginners.
One line if else statement: a = 2. b = 330. print("A") if a > b else print("B") You can also have multiple else statements on the same line:
Learn how to work with if, else, if-else, and elif statements in Python. Learn online and earn valuable credentials from top universities like Yale, Michigan, Stanford, and leading companies like Google and IBM. Join Coursera for free and ...
__target_text__ could replace @'' for both identifier assignment and tuple assignment ( __target_name__ wouldn't match the latter use case) Sounds good indeed. With the name __target_text__ we wouldn't have to worry about a plural form. I doubt you could reasonably use that form to map function parameters to local variables of the same name ...
The "PEP 572 mess" was the topic of a 2018 Python Language Summit session led by benevolent dictator for life (BDFL) Guido van Rossum. PEP 572 seeks to add assignment expressions (or "inline assignments") to the language, but it has seen a prolonged discussion over multiple huge threads on the python-dev mailing list—even after multiple rounds on python-ideas. Those threads were often ...
Locate the Weekly Assignment Files: Inside the course folder, you will find files named week-01.md, week-02.md, and so on up to week-12.md. These files contain the assignment answers for each respective week. Select the Week File: Click on the file corresponding to the week you are interested in.
I do, however, find it to be an intriguing idea (prompted by this post in the PEP 736 discussion thread), so it seemed worth sharing in case someone else liked it enough to pick it up and run with it. The core of the idea: A standalone @ symbol on the right hand side of an assignment expr...
Python Conditions and If statements Python supports the usual logical conditions from mathematics: Equals: a == b Not Equals: a != b Less than: a < b Less than or equal to: a <= b Greater than: a > b Greater than or equal to: a >= b These conditions can be used in several ways, most commonly in "if statements" and loops. An "if statement" is written by using the if keyword. Example Get your ...
elif a == b: print("a and b are equal") else: print("a is greater than b") In this example a is greater than b , so the first condition is not true, also the elif condition is not true, so we go to the else condition and print to screen that "a is greater than b". You can also have an else without the elif: