thesis reading difficulties

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: a synthesis of research from 2000–2019.

1. Introduction

1.1. oral reading fluency, 1.2. oral reading fluency and reading difficulties, 1.3. the current study, 2.1. selection procedures.

• Articles had participants who were described as at-risk for or having reading difficulties. Articles with learning difficulties, struggling readers, at-risk readers, below level readers, and learning-disabled readers were all included. Articles were included if they provided segregated data for students with reading difficulties if students with reading difficulties were part of a larger group of participants. Articles with average or above-average readers were excluded.
• Studies used experimental or quasi-experimental designs with a treatment and control group. Studies using single-case designs were excluded. Studies which did not include a no-treatment control group were excluded. Meta-analysis, commentaries, or other synthesis papers were excluded.
• Participants were elementary-age students (i.e., kindergarten through fifth grade). Articles were included if they provided segregated data for elementary students if students were part of a larger group of participants. Articles with less than 50% of participants enrolled in elementary school were excluded.
• Fluency intervention was delivered in English in a school setting. Studies with the intervention being delivered at home or in a clinic setting were excluded. Studies in languages other than English were excluded.
• Articles focused on the implementation of an oral reading fluency intervention that aimed to improve students’ oral reading fluency. Articles were included if at least 50% of a multi-component intervention was targeting oral reading fluency. Studies not including oral reading fluency of connected text as a dependent measure were excluded.

2.2. Coding Procedures

2.3. calculation of effect sizes, 3.1. participant characteristics, 3.2. effective oral reading fluency interventions, 3.2.1. repeated reading, 3.2.2. listening while reading, 3.2.3. continuous reading, 3.3. prosody, 4. discussion, limitations and future research, 5. implications and conclusions, author contributions, conflicts of interest.

• National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2019 ; National Center for Educational Statistics: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
• Lerner, J. Learning Disabilities: Theories, Diagnosis, and Teaching Strategies ; Houghton Mifflin: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chall, J.S. Stages of Reading Development ; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [ Google Scholar ]
• Daane, M.C.; Campbell, J.R.; Grigg, W.S.; Goodman, M.J.; Oranje, A. Fourth-Grade Students Reading Aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading ; (NCES 2006-469); U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
• National Reading Panel (US); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US). Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction ; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health: Rockville, MD, USA, 2000.
• Abadzi, H. Reading Fluency Measurements in EFA FTI Partner Countries: Outcomes and Improvement Prospects ; Tech. Rep., Global Partnership for Education; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wimmer, H.; Mayringer, H.; Landerl, K. Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Sci. Stud. Read. 1998 , 2 , 321–340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Jong, P.F.; van der Leij, A. Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read in a normally achieving orthography. J. Educ. Psychol. 2003 , 95 , 22–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuhn, M.R.; Rasinski, T.; Young, C. The best practices in fluency instruction. In Best Practices in Literacy Instruction , 6th ed.; Morrow, L.M., Gambrell, L.B., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 271–288. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuhn, M.R.; Stahl, S.A. Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. J. Educ. Psychol. 2003 , 95 , 3–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gough, P.; Tunmer, W. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Rem. Spec. Educ. 1986 , 7 , 6–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Allington, R.L. Fluency: The neglected reading goal. Read. Teach. 1983 , 36 , 556–561. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scarborough, H.S. Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Handbook for Research in Early Literacy ; Neuman, S., Dickinson, D., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 97–110. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, Y.S.G.; Wagner, R.K. Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Sci. Stud. Read. 2015 , 19 , 224–242. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] [ Green Version ]
• LaBerge, D.; Samuels, S.J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognit. Psychol. 1974 , 6 , 293–323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cain, K.; Oakhill, J.; Bryant, P. Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. J. Educ. Psychol. 2004 , 96 , 31–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Palladino, P.; Cornoldi, C.; DeBeni, R.; Pazzaglia, F. Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Mem. Cognit. 2001 , 29 , 344–354. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] [ Green Version ]
• Garnett, K. Fluency in learning to read: Conceptions, misconceptions, learning disabilities, and instructional moves. In Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills , 3rd ed.; Birsh, J.R., Ed.; Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Silverman, R.D.; Speece, D.L.; Harring, K.R.; Ritchey, K.D. Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading. Sci. Stud. Read. 2012 , 17 , 108–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• O’Connor, R.E. Reading fluency and students with reading disabilities: How fast is fast enough to promote reading comprehension? J. Learn. Disabil. 2018 , 51 , 124–136. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sabatini, J.P.; O’Reilly, T.; Halderman, L.K.; Bruce, K. Integrating scenario—Based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of struggling readers. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pr. 2014 , 29 , 36–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rasinski, T.V. Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody. Read. Teach. 2006 , 59 , 704–706. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Zutell, J.; Donelson, R.; Mangelson, J.; Todt, P. Building a focus on oral reading fluency into individual instruction for struggling readers. In Fluency Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2nd ed.; Rasinski, T., Blachowicz, C., Lems, K., Eds.; Guildford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Miller, J.; Schwanenflugel, P.J. Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. J. Educ. Psychol. 2006 , 98 , 839–843. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Meisinger, E.; Bloom, J.; Hynd, G. Reading fluency: Implications for the assessment of children with reading disabilities. Ann. Dyslexia 2010 , 60 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Individuals with Disability Education Act [IDEA]. Available online: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/idea/108-446.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2019).
• Archer, A.L.; Gleason, M.M.; Vachon, V.L. Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learn. Disabil. Q. 2003 , 26 , 89–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rasinski, T.V.; Padak, N.D. How elementary students referred for compensatory reading instruction perform on school-based measures of word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Read. Psychol. 1998 , 19 , 185–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kang, E.Y.; Shin, M. The contributions of reading fluency and decoding to reading comprehension for struggling readers in fourth grade. Read. Writ. Q. 2019 , 35 , 179–192. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lovett, M.W.; Steinbach, K.A.; Frijters, J.C. Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. J. Learn. Disabil. 2000 , 33 , 334–358. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Just, M.A.; Carpenter, P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychol. Rev. 1992 , 99 , 122–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Logan, G.D. Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Read. Writ. Q. 1997 , 13 , 123–146. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Swanson, H.L.; Zheng, X.; Jerman, O. Working memory, short-term memory, and reading disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. J. Learn. Disabil. 2009 , 42 , 260–287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Begeny, J.C.; Laugle, K.M.; Krouse, H.E.; Lynn, A.E.; Tayrose, M.P.; Stage, S.A. A control-group comparison of two reading fluency programs: The Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) program and the great leaps K-2 reading program. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2010 , 39 , 137–155. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lyon, G.R.; Moats, L.C. Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. J. Learn. Disabil. 1997 , 30 , 578–588. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wexler, J.; Vaughn, S.; Edmonds, M.; Reutebuch, C.K. A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Read. Writ. 2008 , 21 , 317–347. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Lee, J.; Yoon, S.Y. The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. J. Learn. Disabil. 2017 , 50 , 213–224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chard, D.J.; Vaughn, S.; Tyler, B.J. A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 2002 , 35 , 386–406. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Therrien, W.J. Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Rem. Spec. Educ. 2004 , 24 , 252–261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stevens, E.A.; Walker, M.A.; Vaughn, S. The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. J. Learn. Disabil. 2017 , 50 , 576–590. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elbaum, B.; Vaughn, S.; Hughes, M.; Moody, S.W. Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Except. Child. 1999 , 65 , 399–415. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Torgesen, J.K.; Alexander, A.W.; Wagner, R.K.; Rashotte, C.A.; Voeller, K.K.S.; Conway, T. Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. J. Learn. Disabil. 2001 , 34 , 33–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chard, D.; Ketterlin-Geller, L.; Baker, S.; Doabler, C.; Apichatabutra, C. Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Except. Child. 2009 , 75 , 263–281. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Garnett, K. Fluency in learning to read: Conceptions, misconceptions, learning disabilities, and instructional moves. In Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills , 4th ed.; Birsh, J.R., Carreker, S., Eds.; Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, M.K.; Bryant, D.P.; Bryant, B.R.; Park, Y. A synthesis of interventions for improving oral reading fluency of elementary students with learning disabilities. Prev. Sch. Fail. 2017 , 61 , 116–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Algozzine, B.; Marr, M.B.; Kavel, R.L.; Dugan, K.K. Using peer coaches to build oral reading fluency. J. Educ. Stud. Pl. R. 2009 , 14 , 256–270. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Begeny, J.C.; Mitchell, R.C.; Whitehouse, M.H.; Harris, C.F.; Stage, S.A. Effects of the HELPS reading fluency program when implemented by classroom teachers with low-performing second-grade students. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pr. 2011 , 26 , 122–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Begeny, J.C.; Ross, S.G.; Greene, D.J.; Mitchell, R.C.; Whitehouse, M.H. Effects of the Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: A preliminary evaluation. J. Behav. Educ. 2012 , 21 , 134–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Esteves, K.J.; Whitten, E. Assisted reading with digital audiobooks for students with reading disabilities. Read. Horizons 2011 , 51 , 21–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Friedland, A.; Gilman, M.; Johnson, M.; Demeke, A. Does reading-while-listening enhance students’ reading fluency? Preliminary results from school experiments in rural Uganda. J. Educ. Pract. 2017 , 8 , 82–95. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuhn, M. A comparative study of small group fluency instruction. Read. Psychol. 2005 , 26 , 127–146. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marr, M.B.; Algozzine, B.; Nicholson, K.; Dugan, K.K. Building oral reading fluency with peer coaching. Rem. Spec. Educ. 2011 , 32 , 256–264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martens, B.K.; Eckert, T.L.; Begeny, J.C.; Lewandowski, L.J.; DiGennaro, F.D.; Montarello, S.A.; Arbolino, L.A.; Reed, D.D.; Fiese, B.H. Effects of a fluency-building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. J. Behav. Educ. 2007 , 16 , 39–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• O’Connor, R.E.; White, A.; Swanson, H.L. Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Except. Child. 2007 , 74 , 31–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saenz, L.M.; Fuchs, L.S.; Fuchs, D. Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Except. Child. 2005 , 71 , 231–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Therrien, W.J.; Wickstrom, K.; Jones, K. Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pr. 2006 , 21 , 89–97. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vadasy, P.F.; Sanders, E.A. Benefits of repeated reading intervention for low-achieving fourth- and fifth-grade students. Rem. Spec. Educ. 2008 , 29 , 235–249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vadasy, P.F.; Sanders, E.A. Repeated reading intervention: Outcomes and interactions with readers’ skills and classroom instruction. J. Educ. Psychol. 2008 , 100 , 272–290. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vadasy, P.F.; Sanders, E.A. Supplemental fluency intervention and determinants of reading outcomes. Sci. Stud. Read. 2009 , 13 , 383–425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Young, C.; Mohr, K.A.J.; Rasinski, T. Reading together: A successful reading fluency intervention. Lit. Res. Instr. 2015 , 54 , 67–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Young, C.; Pearce, D.; Gomez, J.; Christensen, R.; Pletcher, B.; Fleming, K. Read two impress and the neurological impress method: Effects on elementary students’ reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude. J. Educ. Res. 2018 , 111 , 657–665. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carlson, K.D.; Schmidt, F.L. Impact of experimental design on effect size: Findings from the research literature on training. J. App. Psychol. 1999 , 84 , 851–862. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Morris, S.B. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ. Res. Methods 2008 , 11 , 364–386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2nd ed.; Lawrence Earlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hasbrouck, J.; Tindal, G. Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for teachers. Read. Teach. 2006 , 59 , 636–644. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• U.S. Department of Education. NAEP’s Oral Reading Fluency Scale ; U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
• Rasinski, T.; Rikli, A.; Johnston, S. Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Lit. Res. Instr. 2009 , 48 , 350–361. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Edmonds, M.S.; Vaughn, S.; Wexler, J.; Reutebuch, C.; Cable, A.; Tackett, K.K.; Schnakenberg, J.W. A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Rev. Educ. Res. 2009 , 79 , 262–300. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Kamil, M.L. Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of the national reading panel findings. In The Voice of Evidence in Reading Research ; McCardle, P., Chhabra, V., Eds.; Paul H. Brookes: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Morris, R.D.; Lovett, M.W.; Wolf, M.; Sevcik, R.A.; Steinbach, K.A.; Frijters, J.C.; Shapiro, M.B. Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. J. Learn. Disabil. 2012 , 45 , 99–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hay, I.; Elias, G.; Fielding-Barnsley, R.; Homel, R.; Freiberg, K. Language delays, reading delays, and learning difficulties: Interactive elements requiring multidimensional programming. J. Learn. Disabil. 2007 , 40 , 400–409. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Solis, M.; Ciullo, S.; Vaughn, S.; Pyle, N.; Hassaram, B.; Leroux, A. Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. J. Learn. Disabil. 2012 , 45 , 327–340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Swanson, H.L.; Hoskyn, M.; Lee, C. Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities ; Guilford: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Good, R.H.; Gruba, G.G.; Kaminski, R.A. Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). In Best Practices in School Psychology IV ; Thomas, A., Grimes, J., Eds.; National Association of School Psychologists: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pressley, M.; Hilden, K.; Shankland, R. An Evaluation of End-Grade-3 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Speed Reading Without Comprehension, Predicting Little (Tech. Rep.) ; Literacy Achievement Research Center, Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Samuels, S.J. The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by fluency? Read. Res. Quart. 2007 , 42 , 563–566. [ Google Scholar ]
• Spector, J.E. How reliable are informal reading inventories? Psychol. Sch. 2005 , 42 , 593–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuhn, M.R.; Stahl, S.A. Fluency: A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices ; Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rasinski, T.V.; Hoffman, T.V. Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Read. Res. Quart. 2003 , 38 , 510–522. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. An Introduction to English Prosody ; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1986. [ Google Scholar ]
• Benjamin, R.; Schwanenflugel, P.J. Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Read. Res. Quart. 2010 , 45 , 388–404. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nevler, N.; Ash, S.; Jester, C.; Irwin, D.J.; Liberman, M.; Grossman, M. Automatic measurement of prosody in behavioral variant FTD. Neurology 2017 , 89 , 650–656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ehri, L.C. Stages of development in learning to read words by sight. J. Res. Read. 1995 , 18 , 116–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stanovich, K.E. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences in individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read. Res. Quart. 1986 , 21 , 360–407. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meyer, M.S.; Felton, R.H. Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new direction. Ann. Dyslexia 1999 , 49 , 283–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Millis, K.K.; King, A. Rereading strategically: The influences of comprehension ability and a prior reading on the memory for expository text. Read. Psychol. 2001 , 22 , 41–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rasinski, T.V. The Fluent Reader: Oral and Silent Reading Strategies for Building Word Recognition, Fluency, and Comprehension , 2nd ed.; Scholastic: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rasinski, T.V. Why reading fluency should be hot. Read. Teach. 2012 , 5 , 516–522. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Woolley, G.; Hay, I. Reading intervention: The benefits of using trained tutors. Aust. J. Lang. Lit. 2007 , 30 , 9–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wolf, M.; Katzir-Cohen, T. Reading fluency and its intervention. Sci. Stud. Read. 2001 , 5 , 211–239. [ Google Scholar ]
• Roberts, G.J.; Capin, P.; Roberts, G.; Miciak, J.; Quinn, J.M.; Vaughn, S. Examining the effects of afterschool reading interventions for upper elementary struggling readers. Rem. Spec. Ed. 2018 , 39 , 131–143. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bryk, A.S. 2014 AERA distinguished lecture: Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educ. Res. 2015 , 9 , 467–477. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, J.S. Making every study count: Learning from replication failure to improve intervention research. Educ. Res. 2019 , 48 , 599–607. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, T.L.; Hodges, R.E. The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing ; International Reading Association: Newark, NJ, USA, 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guidelines for Examining Phonics and Word Recognition Programs ; Texas Reading Initiative; Texas Education Agency: Austin, TX, USA, 2002.

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Hudson, A.; Koh, P.W.; Moore, K.A.; Binks-Cantrell, E. Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019. Educ. Sci. 2020 , 10 , 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052

Hudson A, Koh PW, Moore KA, Binks-Cantrell E. Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences . 2020; 10(3):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052

Hudson, Alida, Poh Wee Koh, Karol A. Moore, and Emily Binks-Cantrell. 2020. "Fluency Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties: A Synthesis of Research from 2000–2019" Education Sciences 10, no. 3: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Psychology: Research and Review

• Open access
• Published: 20 March 2021

Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures

• Maíra Anelli Martins   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-6755 1 , 2 , 3 &
• Simone Aparecida Capellini 2 , 3 , 4  

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica volume  34 , Article number:  10 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

19k Accesses

5 Citations

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

To identify readers who are struggling or at risk of reading difficulties, reference standards in oral reading fluency (ORF) are used to conduct an assessment that is based on a widely reported method known as curriculum-based measurement (CBM), which itself is based on 1-min fluency measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ ORF (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and to determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile.

For this study, a database of readings made available by the Learning Studies Research Laboratory was used. This database consisted of 365 readings by elementary-school students from the third to fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo from two different public school systems that use the same teaching methodology. The data consisted of digital audio recordings of the passage “The Umbrella” (text suitable for schooling levels) of the Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension procedure. For this procedure, three steps were performed: step 1—listening to the 365 readings and assessing the scores for the number of words read correctly per minute; step 2—the calculation of the mean and percentiles for each grade; and step 3—the adaptation of the reference table to indicate students eligible to receive reading fluency intervention.

Third-year students who correctly read 86 or more words per minute, fourth-year students who correctly read 104 or more words per minute, and fifth-year students who correctly read 117 or more words per minute were considered students who had made adequate progress in reading.

It was possible to classify students based on the 1-min fluency measures, with reference intervals of words read correctly per minute per school year (for the third, fourth, and fifth years) for those who were making adequate progress in reading and reference intervals for those who were considered readers who were struggling or at risk of reading difficulties.

Little research has been conducted in Brazil on measures to assess reading fluency (Gentilini et al, 2020 ; Andrade, Celeste, & Alves, 2019 ; Moutinho, 2016 ; Pacheco & Santos, 2017 ; Peres & Mousinho, 2017 ), and a search for research on reading fluency in official documents of the Brazilian Ministry of Education (Martins, 2018 ) also reveals that such measures are not a type of assessment that is widely known or applied by teachers within the classroom. Nonetheless, research has continually indicated the importance of developing oral reading fluency (ORF; reading with appropriate rate, accuracy, and prosody) as a vital and necessary skill for the overall development of proficient reading (Machado, Santos, & Cruz, 2019 ; Rasinski & Young, 2017 ).

In addition to the lack of Brazilian research widely exploring this theme, the low performance data of Brazilian students in reading indicates that these students also face difficulties in learning this highly complex activity, including the many who do not become proficient, effective readers. It is noted that this is a recurring problem that affects students and, consequently, concerns educators. As is clear from the evaluations conducted throughout the national territory (large-scale evaluations), the problem has continued throughout the years and affects even the regions with the best educational indexes or socioeconomic status.

Measures assessment of reading oral fluency

The method widely publicized as curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a curriculum-based progress-monitoring method for measuring growth in specific areas of basic knowledge and skills and assessing the effects of instructional programs (response to intervention). Curriculum-based assessment, as a longstanding assessment practice asserting that learning assessments should be based on what has been taught, has become popular in the field of special education. Thus, the CBM method is described as curriculum-based, as it is used within the context of the school curriculum (Deno, 1985 ).

The CBM method proposes simple measures for the assessment of academic competence that can be applied quickly by teachers. These measures help provide an overview of each student’s academic development; furthermore, when these simple measures are applied systematically over time, they can be used to track a student’s potential difficulties (Fuchs, 2017 ).

For example, to identify struggling readers, reference standards for ORF are used, which, based on the CBM assessment method initially proposed by Deno ( 1985 ), enable reading analysis in just 1 min (e.g., the number of words read correctly per minute–WCPM). The most widely used assessment of ORF, which focuses on two of the three components of fluency (rate and accuracy), simply requires the student to read a grade-appropriate passage, which they have not seen previously, for 1 min. At the end of 1 min, errors are subtracted from the total words read, and then the WCPM score is calculated (Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006 ).

Thus, the method was developed to create procedures for measuring progressive development in a simple, reliable, and valid way. These procedures enable teachers to frequently and repeatedly measure students’ progress in basic reading, spelling, writing, and expression skills (Rasinski, 2004 ).

Regarding reading fluency assessment, it is recommended that the scoring of the number of words read correctly per minute (WCPM) and the number of words read incorrectly per minute (WIPM) be performed with three passages of the same difficulty level to then calculate the mean score. Thus, the WCPM measure can serve to screen for academically at-risk students, assign placement in remedial and special education programs, monitor student progress, improve teaching programs, and predict performance in high-risk assessments (Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006 ; Rasinski, 2004 ).

A series of discussions began in the last decade in Brazil on the question of the “wait to fail to act” model, which highlighted the importance of the early identification of learning difficulties. There are also discussions about the broadening of knowledge about the advantages of early identification and scientific evidence-based assessment and screening methods (Almeida, Piza, Toledo, Cardoso, & Miranda, 2016 ; Batista & Pestun, 2019 ; Brito, Seabra, & Macedo, 2018 ; Justi & Cunha, 2016 ; Mayeda, Navatta, & Miotto, 2018 ; Nicolau & Navas, 2015 ; Palles da Silva & Guaresi, 2019 ; Rodrigues & Ciasca, 2016 ; Silva & Capellini, 2017 ; Silva & Capellini, 2019a ; Silva & Crenitte, 2016 ).

According to Elliott, Huai and Roach ( 2007 ), several factors contribute to the prevalence of the “wait to fail to act” model, such as the fact that educators understand that there is a certain heterogeneity of development and learning among students and seek to allow appropriate time for this development. By doing so, they are also allowing students a fair chance of progressing without early determination of the problem. Another factor for the prevalence of this action model is the fact that few large-scale screening instruments are time efficient and technically simple for teachers to apply.

In the Brazilian literature, early screening instruments are recent and focus primarily on metalinguistic skills, such as the “Early Identification and Reading Problems Protocol” (Capellini, César, & Germano, 2017 ), the “Evaluation of Cognitive-Language Skills Protocol: Professional and Teacher’s Book” (Capellini, Smythe, Silva, 2017 ) and the “Protocol for Cognitive-Language Skills Assessment of Students in Early Literacy” (Silva & Capellini, 2019b ). These instruments assess skills considered predictive of literacy, such as reading and writing skills; arithmetic; auditory and visual processing; metalinguistic skills; and processing speed with the rapid automatic naming test. Some tests evaluate mathematical logical reasoning, for example, the “Cognitive-Language Skills Assessment Protocol.”

Likewise, there has been a movement in Brazilian research in recent years to describe the importance of reading fluency measures, especially those related to using a chronometer for timing as measures for screening difficulties, in addition to the development of instruments to assist in this assessment. Alves et al. ( 2019 ) described such issues in the most recent publication of the LEPIC® software, which proposes a semiautomatic and instantaneous reading fluency analysis to assess and assist in diagnostics or to monitor reading skills. This analysis focuses on the importance of evaluating parameter fluency, which may include indicators of reading problems such as dyslexia. Another instrument recently developed by Brazilian researchers is a collection of passages in sequential order according to difficulty level and suitable for elementary-school students from the first through fourth grades, called the “Reading Fluency Performance Assessment” (Martins & Capellini, 2018 ).

Additionally, on 22 February 2018, the More Literacy Program (PMAlfa) was created via MEC Ordinance No. 142, a strategy by the Ministry of Education that aims to strengthen and support school units in the process of increasing the literacy of elementary-school students enrolled in the first and second grades; the program fulfills the criteria established in the Common National Curriculum Base (CNCB). The objective of the program is to perform reading, writing, and math evaluations. For the first time, a formal program of the Brazilian government will evaluate the fluency and accuracy in the reading ability of students in the second grade of elementary school. The assessment is performed individually and uses a proprietary application suitable for smartphones or tablets.

However, despite efforts to create adequate assessment procedures for ORF, research into the characterization of ORF in this population is still incipient. Pacheco and Santos ( 2017 ), for example, evaluated three groups of readers in relation to reading fluency who were classified into three groups: group I–second-grade readers with little reading experience and expectation of low reading fluency; group II–second-year high school readers with the expectation of having slightly more reading experience and moderate fluency; and group III–readers with a higher education level. However, the relatively small sample consisted of 12 participants (four participants in each group), and the reading rate was evaluated by using the number of words read compared to the total reading time measured in seconds, considering a total reading time of 180 s (3 min).

In another study (Moutinho, 2016 ), 46 sixth-grade students from public and private schools were evaluated by measuring the WCPM in 1 min from three different passages. However, the article focused on describing the accuracy errors, i.e., the number and type of WIPM, while data for the WCPM are not presented. Other researchers evaluated 55 students from the third to the seventh grades with the number of words per minute, reading four different types of passages, and analyzing student performance in each (Dellisa & Navas, 2013 ).

Some researchers have also conducted reading fluency assessment with elementary students, as in a study that evaluated 32 students in ninth grade and calculated the speed of words read per minute (using the formula of total number of words from the passage, divided by the time in seconds spent to complete the reading, and multiplied by 60) (Komeno, Ávila, Cintra, & Schoen, 2015 ). Furthermore, in another recent study, researchers characterized the ORF by 232 middle-grade students from the sixth to the ninth grades from public and private education. The study provided an estimate of the expected values for each grade surveyed by reading an easy passage based on the 1-min oral fluency assessment, with scores for words read per minute and WCPM (Andrade et al., 2019 ).

While only a small number of studies for elementary and middle students exist, even fewer studies evaluate reading fluency in high school students or adults. One research study evaluated 88 students in the second grade of high school. The CBM method was followed by selecting a passage compatible with students’ age and grade and comprising subjects corresponding to the basic curriculum studied in the classroom. Students read three different passages, lasting 1 min each, for the subsequent calculation of the number of WCPM (Oliveira, Amaral, & Picanço, 2013 ). Only one study evaluating reading fluency in adults was found, in which the sample consisted of 30 adolescents and adults who were evaluated by measuring the number of words per minute (Peres & Mousinho, 2017 ).

The assessment of ORF conducted through WCPM scores presents 30 years of validation research indicating that this is a valid and reliable measure that reflects a student's overall performance in reading development during the first years after literacy (Morris et al., 2017a , b ; Tindal, 2017 ; Valencia et al., 2010 ). Reading fluency benchmarks have been used both for screening and for monitoring reading development, and research in these fields seeks to answer questions such as “How is student performance compared to their peers?” and “Who are the students struggling with reading?” This practice of frequent assessment enables early intervention and the planning of activities that focus on the skills already acquired and those that still require further attention.

Benchmarks in ORF have been established by American researchers and collected from a range of students, from those identified as talented or otherwise exceptionally skilled to those diagnosed with reading disabilities, such as dyslexia. The largest sample of the ORF benchmark was collected from schools and districts in 23 states in the USA for over 4 years. Based on their vast experience in interpreting ORF data, it was established that a score of 10 words above or below the 50th percentile should be interpreted as an expected score, meaning that students are making satisfactory reading progress (Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006 ).

Given the implications that ORF benchmarks would have for Brazilian education, a study to determine a fluency reference through appropriate assessment material would be of great relevance. This benchmarking considers the indication of a median score (50th percentile), with scores of 10 words above or below this median indicating students who have made appropriate reading progress, to assist in assessment and to create parameters for selecting students for interventional programs who are struggling readers or at risk for developing difficulties in reading proficiency later.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ORF of students from the third to the fifth grades (with a 1-min fluency measure) to characterize their fluency and determine references of appropriate development in reading at the 50th percentile and those below this reference.

This is a quantitative, descriptive-explanatory study. The dependent variable is a 1-min fluency measure. The independent variable is student grade.

General procedures and database

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências of Sao Paulo State University–UNESP-Campus de Marília-SP under protocol 2.550.190–CAAE 50201915.9.0000.5406.

For this study, a database of readings made available by the Investigation Learning Disabilities Laboratory (in Portuguese: Laboratório de Investigação dos Desvios da Aprendizagem–LIDA), registered by a research group of the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), called “Language, Learning, Education,” was used. All information related to the sample of students comprising our database was made available by the members of this group.

The readings database made available consists of 365 readings from elementary-school students from the third to the fifth grades in two cities in the interior of the state of São Paulo (in a medium- and a small-sized Brazilian city, Southeast Region of Brazil) from two different public school systems with the same teaching methodology. In the city of Marília-SP, there are 51 schools with regular elementary education in urban locations, in basic education, with 2221 students enrolled in the third year, 2119 students enrolled in the fourth year and 2033 students enrolled in the fifth year according to the School Census/(Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira – INEP, 2018 ).

In the city of Garça-SP, there are 14 schools with regular elementary education in urban locations, in basic education, with 478 students enrolled in the third year, 436 students enrolled in the fourth year and 401 students enrolled in the fifth year according to the School Census/(Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira – INEP, 2018 ). The schools were selected through convenience sampling (simple convenience sample). The students participating in the studies did not have a history of repeating grades; they were monolinguals and native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. The data were digital recordings of participants reading the passage “The Umbrella” (text suitable for schooling levels) from the procedure “Protocol for Assessment of Reading Comprehension” (Cunha & Capellini, 2014 ).

Of the 365 readings, 98 were third-grade students (48.9% female), 130 were fourth-grade students (49.2% female), and 137 were fifth-grade students (51.8% female) (participants were elementary-school students ranging from 7 to 11 years old).

According to the latest results published (Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira, 2015-2017 ) by the Socioeconomic Level Indicator (Inse) of basic education schools in Brazil, developed by the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira (Inep), in the Basic Education Assessment Directorate (Daeb), the schools from which the analyzed data were obtained have an average Inse (absolute value 58.46 and 57.47), with an average rating (group 5).

The inclusion and exclusion criteria used by the laboratory researchers in the data collection of the reading audio bank are described. The inclusion criteria for the sample selection were as follows: informed consent form signed by the parents or guardians for the students; students with no history of neurological or psychiatric illnesses, uncorrected auditory and visual impairments, and cognitive performance within normal, according to the description at the school records and teachers’ reports. The exclusion criteria for the sample selection were the presence of genetic or neurological syndromes in the students, students who did not present a satisfactory reading domain level for the observation of the variable proposed in the study, and students who presented recording errors in their respective audio files.

Specific instruments and procedures

The passage used was “The Umbrella” (history appropriate for the educational level) from the procedure “Reading Comprehension Assessment Protocol” (Cunha & Capellini, 2014 ). The choice for using this protocol occurred due to its careful assessment and development, since its issues were built from the rules for the psychometric tool development described by The Federal Council of Psychology. The Council is an official body that studies and establishes criteria and rules in Brazil for the construction of evaluation tools that ensures their accuracy and validity, and defines, as reliable procedures, those whose accuracy is understood as their level of consistency and their ability to reach the objectives for which they were built as their validity.

The protocol consists of four passages, two narratives, and two expository narratives. A medium-length (297 words) narrative passage was chosen. The choice of a passage with a narrative gender protocol occurred because the students had been more commonly exposed to such passages since childhood and throughout the education process, which would simplify the fluency evaluation and avoid the interference of any cultural issues of the passage in the reading results of the students of different schooling levels.

The choice of protocol also occurred because it presents passages that were selected to reach students from the third, fourth and fifth grades at representatively similar levels of difficulty for all school years, making it possible to apply a single passage in all school years.

Although the procedure is an instrument for assessing reading comprehension, due to the objectives of this study, only the reading recordings were used to assess fluency, while the multiple-choice questions were not applied.

The equipment used in the recordings was a Karsect microphone headset, which was unidirectional since the microphone picks up sounds with greater intensity and orients towards where it is directed, reducing the intensity of the external noise. The microphone was connected to an HP notebook with an Intel Pentium processor, 3 GB memory, and a 32-bit operating system. Recordings were made with an original HP software application and were saved as .wav files.

The collections were carried out by the researchers of the mentioned research group, following the guidelines for individual application. Each reading of the entire passage was recorded, taking an average of 5 min total for each individual recording session in spaces reserved for the researchers in the schools during class hours.

To analyze the readings on digital media, the following steps were planned and performed:

Step 1 : The rate was scored by listening to 365 digital recordings and assessing the WCPM scores, which was performed according to the reading error classification used by Begeny, Capellini, and Martins ( 2018 ) and by other researchers (Valencia et al., 2010 ). In this approach, the types of errors that are marked as WIPM are mispronounced words, words substituted with others, words omitted, words read out of order, addition or omission of word endings, and hesitation (words on which the student paused more than 3 s, after which he or she is told the word, and it is marked as incorrect. If necessary, the student is told to continue with the next word).

The following items indicate all situations that are marked as WCPM: words pronounced correctly, self-corrections, words decoded slowly but ultimately read correctly, repeated words, words mispronounced due to dialect or regional differences, and words inserted. To quantify errors, scoring rules are also proposed for certain situations: lines or multiple words omitted; when one or more lines are not read (four or more omitted words in sequence), they are not considered errors, although those words are excluded from the WCPM (such that this rule is applied whenever a student skips four or more words within a sentence). If the student skips one, two, or three consecutive words, each word should be counted as an error (WIPM). Regarding hyphenated words that can exist independently, each morpheme separated by a hyphen counts as an individual word if the two parts exist independently when the hyphen is removed, such as “Guarda-chuva ” [Umbrella in Portuguese] (counts as two words but is only marked incorrect when the student misreads), as opposed to the word “ anglo-China ” (considered as one word, regardless of which or both are misread).

Step 2 : The data thus obtained were tabulated and processed with Microsoft Excel® 2010. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and percentiles). Percentiles 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, and 95 were calculated for each grade. Stratifying these percentiles helps to understand the different levels of difficulty that students may present.

Step 3 : The reference table was adjusted for the selection of students eligible to receive reading fluency interventions or programs. For this, the minimum reference threshold was the 25th percentile, and the maximum reference limit was the 50th percentile. The reference to the 25th percentile represents an approximate limit on the minimum level of ORF that a student should present to benefit from a fluency program. This reference was developed through years of research and related interventions (Begeny et al., 2018 ; Field, Begeny, & Kim, 2019 ).

Thus, it was determined that in the present research, WCPM intervals (maximum and minimum limits) would be established to select students who were not making adequate reading progress based on the ORF standard published by Hasbrouck and Tindal ( 2006 ).

The results regarding the reading fluency assessment measure as a procedure for selecting struggling readers or at risk of developing reading difficulties (grades 3 to 5) are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 .

From the data presented in Table 1 , students in the third year who read 86 or more WCPM, in the fourth year who read 104 or more WCPM, and in the fifth year who read 117 or more WCPM are considered students who are making adequate progress in reading. As shown in Table 1 , the lower the student scored beneath the 25th percentile, the more difficulties with reading the student will present, and the higher the student scored above the 50th percentile, the better the student’s performance.

Considering the standards proposed by Hasbrouck and Tindal ( 2006 , p. 639), in which students who read more than 10 WCPM above the 50th percentile present appropriate reading progress (unless there are other indicators for concern), the WCPM was established for Brazilian students (Table 2 ).

The reference intervals were calculated from the readings by the 365 students, considering that those who presented a WCPM score between the 25th and 50th percentiles did not make satisfactory progress in their reading fluency and taking the 25th percentile as the minimum reference limit and the 50th percentile as the maximum reference limit (Table 2 ). Students with WCPM scores at the 25th percentile or below are unlikely to benefit from a fluency-based intervention because they likely need assistance with decoding, phonics, and/or phonemic awareness.

Measures such as the number of WCPM offer numerous advantages for use in the context of ORF assessment. This measure has already been proven to be valid and is a quick and simple measure; it can be easily implemented in educators’ routines, either within the school routine or with professionals in their clinics. The reliability coefficient of this study could not be used if the test used because a single item test was used (number of words read correctly). If used as a screening measure for students at risk of reading difficulties, it should be performed by teachers from the third grade, since it is from this series that all students are expected to have passed the literacy phase and to move from the phase of learning to read to the phase of reading to learn. Consequently, within just a few hours, a teacher can evaluate their entire class because the assessment is performed quickly, which would also enable frequent assessments, which would, in turn, enable the monitoring of students’ progress in their fluency (Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006 ; Rasinski, 2004 ; Rasinski & Young, 2017 ).

For reference values, the data obtained in this study served to identify students who were making adequate reading progress and those who could benefit from a fluency program. Among the academic skills considered central to reading success, fluency reveals not only its importance in assessing and screening key components but also in intervention response strategies and models for absorbing the demand encountered after the screening and early identification of reading difficulties (Kostewicz et al., 2016 ).

Considering the Brazilian studies on the characterization of ORF, we note that despite their small number (Andrade et al., 2019 ; Dellisa & Navas, 2013 ; Komeno et al., 2015 ; Moutinho, 2016 ; Oliveira et al., 2013 ; Pacheco & Santos, 2017 ; Peres & Mousinho, 2017 ), the results help to predict and compare student performance. It is necessary to advance the description of the results to create fluency references so that they can be used to screen for students with general reading difficulties, according to each region of the country. It is emphasized that due to the continental dimensions of the Brazilian national territory, there are considerable cultural and educational differences among regions.

Therefore, the method of assessing a measure of ORF in given passages can be used to assess student progress in reading fluency competence; to predict and compare students’ performance with peers or benchmarks (since their performance is compared over time) as well as conduct individual assessments; set annual goals; assess the effectiveness of intervention programs; develop standards for the class, school, and/or region; identify students at risk of dyslexia or in need of further intervention; and serve as the initial source of data collection in the response-to-intervention model (Mendonça & Martins, 2014 ).

Implications

There are public policy problems that involve this issue of early identification in Brazil, as there are no projects or actions directed at absorbing the demand of learning disabilities within the school itself. This difficulty makes the implementation of a screening process for early identification more difficult, since once these students with difficulties have been identified, there is a corresponding need for interventions, such as intervention response models together with the need for a complete structural and practical change within the classroom to modify the deeply rooted tradition of “waiting to fail to take action” (Elliott et al., 2007 ). However, as observed in a recent program created by the Ministry of Education (More Literacy Program–PMAlfa), new ways of implementing the screening of reading difficulties and continuing teacher education to ensure that they master the methodologies for progress monitoring and evaluation of student performance are beginning to appear.

It is also important to underscore that recent research has focused on the development of instruments and materials suitable for this type of evaluation and progress-monitoring, such as passages that are appropriate for the grade level and classified according to their difficulty, that not only allow the modification of the “waiting to fail to act” tradition but also allow suitable fluency assessment applications with materials that not only accelerate but also facilitate evaluation (such as software and applications) (Alves et al., 2019 ). This approach also means that three passages of the same level of difficulty can be offered (as a collection of sequential passages) to the students for assessment (Martins & Capellini, 2018 ), with sets of three passages to be applied throughout the school year to facilitate the monitoring of student progress.

Despite its limitations, this study extended the literature (Andrade et al., 2019 ; Dellisa & Navas, 2013 ; Komeno et al., 2015 ; Moutinho, 2016 ; Oliveira et al., 2013 ; Pacheco & Santos, 2017 ; Peres & Mousinho, 2017 ) as part of the research movement to obtain ORF subsidiary reference data for professionals in the health-education interface. However, it is necessary to note that one limitation of this study is the number of samples used. To complement this study and other Brazilian research in this context, new research is needed that increases the number and the representativeness of the sample of Brazilian readers who struggle.

From this study, it was possible to evaluate and characterize the reading fluency of Brazilian students. It was also possible to establish reference intervals for the assessment of ORF, which can be used to screen struggling readers or students at risk who present or may develop reading difficulties.

Therefore, similar research should be carried out and expanded to create measurement parameters related to ORF, which will help teachers make decisions about which paths need to be constructed or improved to assist those students who are presenting difficulty in this learning process.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Curriculum-based measurement

• Oral reading fluency

Words read correctly per minute

Words read incorrectly per minute

More Literacy Program

Common National Curriculum Base

Almeida, R. P., Piza, C. J., De Toledo, M. A., Cardoso, T. S. G., & Miranda, M. C. (2016). Prevenção e remediação das dificuldades de aprendizagem: Adaptação do modelo de resposta à intervenção em uma amostra brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Educação , 21 (66), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782016216632 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Alves, L. M., Cunha, L. O., Santos, L. F., Melo, F. S. M. C., Reis, V. O. M., & Celeste, L. C. (2019). Análise tecnológica da fluência leitora: Validação do software Lepic® nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental. Neurociências (Rio de Janeiro) , 15 , 33–41.

Google Scholar  

Andrade, A. J. L., Celeste, L. C., & Alves, L. M. (2019). Caracterização da fluência de leitura em escolares do Ensino Fundamental II. Audiology - Communication Research , 24 , e1983. Epub March 28. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-1983 .

Batista, M., & Pestun, M. S. V. (2019). O Modelo RTI como estratégia de prevenção aos transtornos de aprendizagem. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional , 23 , e205929. Epub December 02, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392019015929 .

Begeny, J. C., Capellini, S. A., & Martins, M. A. (2018). HELPS-PB: Programa de fluência de leitura para escolares: Manual do instrutor. (English translation: HELPS in Brazilian Portuguese: A Reading fluency program for children; Teacher’s Manual) . Helps Education Fund http://www.helpsprogram.org/ .

Brito, G. R., Seabra, A. G., & Macedo, E. C. (2018). Implementação do modelo de resposta à intervenção em uma classe de 5° ano do ensino fundamental da rede pública de ensino: relato de experiência. Revista Psicopedagogia , 35 (106), 82–93 Recuperado em 13 de junho de 2020, de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84862018000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt .

Capellini, S. A., César, A. B. P. C., & Germano, G. D. (2017). Protocolo de identificação precoce e dos problemas de leitura - IPPL. Book Toy.

Capellini, S. A., Smythe, I., & Silva, C. (2017). Protocolo de avaliação de habilidades cognitivo-linguísticas: Livro do profissional e do professor. Book Toy.

Cunha, V. L. O., & Capellini, S. A. (2014). PROCOMLE: Protocolo de Avaliação da Compreensão de Leitura . Book Toy.

Dellisa, P. R. R., & Navas, A. L. G. P. (2013). Avaliação do desempenho de leitura em estudantes do 3° ao 7° anos, com diferentes tipos de texto. CoDAS , 25 (4), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000400008 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children , 52 (3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200303 .

Elliott, S. N., Huai, N., & Roach, A. T. (2007). Universal and early screening for educational difficulties: Current and future approaches. Journal of School Psychology , 45 (2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.002 .

Field, S. A., Begeny, J. C., & Kim, E. K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between cognitive characteristics and responsiveness to a tier 3 reading fluency intervention. Reading & Writing Quarterly , 35 (4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1553082 .

Fuchs, L. S. (2017). Curriculum-Based Measurement as the emerging alternative: three decades later. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 32 (1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12127 .

Gentilini, L. K. S.,  Andrade, M. E. P.,  Basso, F. P., Salles, J. F., Martins-Reis,V. O., & Alves, L. M. (2020). Desenvolvimento de instrumento para avaliação coletiva da fluência e compreensão de leitura textual em escolares do ensino fundamental II. CoDAS, 32 (2), e20190015. Epub March 02, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192019015

Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: a valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher , 59 (7), 636–644 www.jstor.org/stable/20204400 .

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira – INEP (2018). Censo Escolar. Recuperado de https://academia.qedu.org.br/censo-escolar/

Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira – INEP. Indicadores educacionais . 2015-2017. Recuperado de http://portal.inep.gov.br/indicadores-educacionais

Justi, C. N. G., & Cunha, N. (2016). Tarefas de nomeação seriada rápida: rastreando a dificuldade de leitura. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa , 32 (4), e32425. Epub June 22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e32425 .

Komeno, E. M., Ávila, C. R. B., Cintra, I. P., & Schoen, T. H. (2015). Velocidade de leitura e desempenho escolar na última série do ensino fundamental. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) , 32 (3), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-166X2015000300009 .

Kostewicz, D. E., Kubina, R., Selfridge, K. A., & Gallagher, D. L. (2016). A Review of Fixed Fluency Criteria in Repeated Reading Studies. Reading Improvement, 53 (1), 23–41.

Machado, A. P. G., Santos, I. M., & Cruz, D. S. (2019). Diagnóstico de leitura de estudantes: interfaces entre automaticidade e compreensão leitora. Revista Ponto de Vista , 8 (1), 47–61 https://periodicos.ufv.br/RPV/article/view/9203 .

Martins, M. A. (2018). Programa de fluência de leitura para escolares do 3° ao 5° ano: tradução, adaptação e aplicação (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/152976

Martins, M. A., & Capellini, S. A. (2018). Avaliação do desempenho em fluência de leitura - ADFLU. Book Toy.

Mayeda, G. B. G., Navatta, A. C. R., & Miotto, E. C. (2018). Intervenção fonológica em escolares de risco para dislexia: revisão de literatura. Revista Psicopedagogia , 35 (107), 231–241 Recuperado em 13 de junho de 2020, de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84862018000200010&lng=pt&tlng=pt .

Mendonça, R. F. F., & Martins, A. P. L. (2014). Identificação de alunos em risco de apresentarem dislexia: Um estudo sobre a utilização da monitorização da fluência de leitura num contexto escolar. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial , 20 (1), 09–20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-65382014000100002 .

Morris, D., Trathen, W., Gill, T., Schlagal, R., Ward, D., & Frye, E. M. (2017). Assessing reading rate in the primary grades (1–3). Reading Psychology , 38 (7), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1323057 .

Morris, D., Trathen, W., Perney, J., Gill, T., Schlagal, R., Ward, D., & Frye, E. M. (2017). Three DIBELS tasks vs. three informal reading/spelling tasks: A comparison of predictive validity. Reading Psychology , 38 (3), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1263700 .

Moutinho, M. G. (2016). Erros de precisão na fluência em leitura oral de alunos do sexto ano do ensino fundamental de 4 escolas de Belém-Pará. Revista Escrita (PUCRJ. Online) , 21 , puc-rio.br/-17. https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.escrita.25994 .

Nicolau, C. C., & Navas, A. L. G. P. (2015). Assessment of skills that predict reading success in 1st and 2nd grade children of elementary school. Revista CEFAC: Atualizacão Cientifica em Fonoaudiologia e Educacão , 17 (3), 917 Retrieved from https://link-gale.ez87.periodicos.capes.gov.br/apps/doc/A497053671/AONE?u=capes&sid=AONE&xid=d720db83 .

Oliveira, E. R., Amaral, S. B. G., & Picanço, G. (2013). Velocidade e precisão na leitura oral: Identificando alunos fluentes. Nonada: Letras em Revista , 2 (21), 1–14.  http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=512451671025 .

Pacheco, V., & Santos, A. J. (2017). A fluência e compreensão leitora em diferentes níveis de escolaridade. Confluência , 1 (52), 232–256 http://llp.bibliopolis.info/confluencia/rc/index.php/rc/article/view/172 .

Palles da Silva, L., & Guaresi, R. (2019). Proposta de instrumento para rastreio de dificuldades de aprendizagem em alunos das séries iniciais. Revista Virtual Lingu@ Nostr@ , 6 (1), 68–76 Recuperado de http://linguanostra.net/index.php/Linguanostra/article/view/127 .

Peres, S., & Mousinho, R. (2017). Avaliação de adultos com dificuldades de leitura. Revista da Associação Brasileira de Psicopedagogia , 34 (103), 20–32 http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84862017000100003&lng=pt&tlng=pt .

Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. In Pacific Resources for Education and Learning .

Rasinski, T. V., & Young, C. (2017). Effective instruction for primary grade students who struggle with reading fluency. Inclusive Principles and Practices in Literacy Education (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education) , 11 , 143–157. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000011010 .

Rodrigues, S. D., & Ciasca, S. M. (2016). Dislexia na escola: identificação e possibilidades de intervenção. Revista Psicopedagogia , 33 (100), 86–97 http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84862016000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt .

Silva, C., & Capellini, S. (2019a). Indicadores cognitivo-linguístico em escolares com transtorno fonológico de risco para a dislexia. Distúrbios da Comunicação , 31 (3), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2019v31i3p428-436 .

Silva, C., & Capellini, S. A. (2017). Comparison of performance in metalinguistic tasks among students with and without risk of dyslexia. Journal of Human Growth and Development , 27 (2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.118823 .

Silva, C., & Capellini, S. A. (2019b). Protocolo de avaliação das habilidades cognitivo-linguísticas para escolares em fase inicial de alfabetização . Book Toy.

Silva, N. S. M., & Crenitte, P. A. P. (2016). Performance of children at risk for reading difficulties submitted to an intervention program. CoDAS , 28 (5), 517–525. Epub September 26, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015274 .

Tindal, G. (2017). Oral reading fluency: Outcomes from 30 years of research. (Technical Report 1701). University of Oregon Center Behavioral Research and Teaching. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.brtprojects.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/TechRpt_1701ORF.pdf

Valencia, S., Smith, A., Reece, A., Li, M., Wixson, K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly , 45 (3), 270–291 http://www.jstor.org/stable/27822888 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the Investigation Learning Disabilities Laboratory (LIDA) of Sao Paulo State University-UNESP for making available reading data in digital audios.

Results of this publication funding PhD by the first author by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Speech and Hearing Sciences Department, Sao Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Campus Universitário, Av. Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737, 17525-900, Marília, SP, Brasil

Maíra Anelli Martins

São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Investigation Learning Disabilities Laboratory (LIDA), Marília, SP, Brazil

Maíra Anelli Martins & Simone Aparecida Capellini

“Language, Learning, Education” CNPq Research Group, Marília, SP, Brazil

Full Professor of Speech and Hearing Sciences Department, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Marília, SP, Brazil

Simone Aparecida Capellini

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

MAM designed and executed the study, performed the data collection, and wrote the paper and final revision of the manuscript. SAC designed the study, assisted with the data analyses, critically reviewed the theoretical content, and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maíra Anelli Martins .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or Brazilian research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients signed the informed consent form to participate in the study, following all the necessary ethical recommendations inherent to a project developed with humans.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Martins, M.A., Capellini, S.A. Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures. Psicol. Refl. Crít. 34 , 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z

Download citation

Received : 13 June 2020

Accepted : 01 March 2021

Published : 20 March 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00174-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Struggling readers
• Universal screening
• Academic screening
• Academic difficulties
• Reading research

TEACHER’S STRATEGIES IN OVERCOMING STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXTS

Wati, Yulia Vera (2015) TEACHER’S STRATEGIES IN OVERCOMING STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXTS. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Baca Full Text klik disini

The research entitled Teacher’s Strategies in Overcoming Students’ Difficulties’ in Reading Comprehension of Narrative Texts is a case study research conducted at the eighth grade of a boarding school in Bandung Regency. This research aims to find out what difficulties faced by the students in reading comprehension of narrative text and what strategies used by the teacher to overcome those difficulties. The research was conducted in a class which consisted of 20 participants and 15 of them were taken as the samples. Thedata in this study were obtained from task-giving, interview and observation. The findings revealed that the students faced some difficulties in reading comprehension of narrative texts; limited vocabulary knowledge, problems with processing information, and problems in recalling information after reading. To overcome those difficulties, the teacher used some strategies; repeat the word, describe and support with visual, connected words to students’ lives. Based on this research, it is suggested that those teacher’s strategies can be used at school to improve students’ reading comprehension. Keywords: Students’ difficulties, teacher’s strategies, reading comprehension

Actions (login required)

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

The Connections Companion No. 450

Scroll down for hints and conversation about the puzzle for Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2024.

By New York Times Games

Introducing Connections Bot : a daily tool that provides a personalized analysis of your Connections solve, inspired by WordleBot . Connections Bot lets you know the puzzle’s difficulty level, and whether you made the same mistakes as other solvers. The bot is now available exclusively to the Connections Companion community. Give it a try and let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Good morning, dear connectors. Welcome to today’s Connections forum, where you can give and receive puzzle — and emotional — support.

Be warned: This article includes hints and comments that may contain spoilers for today’s puzzle. Solve Connections first, or scroll at your own risk.

Connections is released at midnight in your time zone. In order to accommodate all time zones, there will be two Connections Companions live every day, dated based on Eastern Standard Time.

If you find yourself on the wrong companion, check the number of your puzzle, and go to this page to find the corresponding companion.

Post your solve grid in the comments and see how your score compares with the editor’s rating, and one another’s.

Today’s difficulty

The difficulty of each puzzle is determined by averaging the ratings provided by a panel of testers who are paid to solve each puzzle in advance to help us catch bugs, inconsistencies and other issues. A higher rating means the puzzle is more difficult.

Today’s difficulty is 3.1 out of 5.

Need a hint?

In Connections, each category has a different difficulty level. Yellow is the simplest, and purple is the most difficult. Click or tap each level to reveal one of the words in that category.

🟨 Straightforward

Further Reading

Want to give us feedback? Email us: [email protected]

Trying to go back to Connections ?

Want to learn more about how the game is made ?

Leave any thoughts you have in the comments! Please follow community guidelines :

Be kind. Comments are moderated for civility.

Having a technical issue? Use the Help button in the Settings menu of the Games app.

Want to talk about Wordle or Spelling Bee? Check out Wordle Review and the Spelling Bee Forum .

See our Tips and Tricks for more useful information on Connections.

Join us here to solve Crosswords, The Mini, and other games by The New York Times.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

THE READING DIFFICULTIES OF GRADE III PUPILS IN DISTRICT IV IN THE SCHOOLS DIVISION OF MANILA

Related Papers

John Wesley Quintero

Davao Research Journal

Adel Jeanne Taoc

The aim of this study is to explore the factors that affect the reading performance of Grade 3 pupils. This study was administered in a classroom with a total of 76 respondents using a researcher-made survey questionnaire that underwent a validity and reliability test. The result determined the level of reading performance of Grade 3 pupils from the data given by the advisers, which is remarked as "reader without comprehension." Moreover, this study determined the level of practice of the factors presented, the significant difference between paired factors, and the factors that best predict reading performance. Among the factors presented, this study revealed that vocabulary knowledge, background knowledge, teacher, and parental involvement best predict the reading performance of Grade 3 pupils at Boston Central Elementary School.

Journal of Integrated Elementary Education

Jeremie Maleon

The Related Variables and the Reading Proficiency Level of Grade Six Pupils

This study describes the relationship between the respondents' reading proficiency level as demonstrated in their Lexile Scores and the following variables: Respondent-related Factors, Teacher Factors, School Factors, and Home Factors. The Theory of Performance (ToP) by Don Elger served as the basis to develop the research instrument, i.e., survey questionnaire. Seventy (70) grade six pupils were authorized by a private school in the Philippines to become the respondents of the study. Correlated with the aforementioned factors were the pupils' reading Lexile Scores provided by Scholastic Philippines. The data were processed through the SPSS software using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient formula. Results revealed that among the four sets of factors, only Home Factors have a significant relationship with the Lexile Scores of the respondents. Furthermore, specific factors such as gender and mother's occupation relate with the pupils' reading proficiency level.

AJHSSR Journal

The study was sought to determine the reading level of Grade II Pupils scaffolding for reading program of Eastern Schools in Botolan District. A reading program was devised to Grade II pupils to enhance their reading ability. Descriptive research design and quantitative in its analysis was employed by the researcher. The reading level of Grade II pupils in terms of word recognition/ oral reading, silent reading comprehension, listening comprehension is frustration. The difficulties in reading level in terms of silent reading comprehension, listening comprehension was described as difficult. The proposed reading program on reading ability of Grade II pupils addresses the identified frustration level on oral reading, silent reading comprehension, listening comprehension, and their difficulties. The evaluation of the reading program by the teachers in terms of content and usefulness was of strongly agree. The Grade II pupils may encourage and motivate to develop a reading habit in school and at home. The Grade II pupils may be exposed to varied techniques, strategies, exercises in executing reading activities for them to be able to achieve the highest level of reading according to standards set by Department of Education. The teacher may provide additional reading materials like books, magazines, encyclopaedias or short story books to improve their reading level in oral reading and comprehension. The Reading Skills Enhancement Program (RSEP) may be proposed to the Department of Education, Division of Zambales for implementation in the Eastern Schools of Botolan, Philippines.

IJARW Research Publication , Faith Panisigan

This study aimed to determine the effect of psychological and social factors to the reading performance of the pupils. The respondents of the study were the intermediate pupils. Self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg’s Self-esteem Scale; and the self-efficacy was determined using an adapted version of Bandura’s Children Self – Efficacy Scale (2006). The reading attitude was measured using the Elementary Reading Attitude Survey designed by McKenna and Kear (1990) and the reading performance was determined using the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory test of the Department of Education. It was found out that the reading performance of the pupils has significant difference when they are grouped according to parents’ educational attainment and availability of reading materials at home. Additionally, the extent of family support has low correlation to reading performance. Self-esteem and word recognition have insignificant correlation whereas self-esteem and comprehension showed a marked correlation. Moreover, self-efficacy and word recognition and comprehension resulted to a low correlation. Lastly, attitude towards reading showed a marked correlation to reading performance, both in word recognition and comprehension. The study concluded that the higher the educational attainment of the parents, the higher the pupils’ reading performance. Furthermore, the profile variables influence the reading performance of the pupils. Generally, the pupils’ self-esteem, self-efficacy, attitude towards reading, and the extent of family support have negligible to low and marked relationship to their reading performance.

Carlo Caparas

International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation

Arleen Rivera

The main purpose of the study was to diagnose the reading difficulties of grade 5 pupils in English. The researchers made use of descriptive method to obtain the data on the reading difficulties, comprehension, and behavioral performance of the respondents. To gather the data, the researchers adopted the reading selections from Philippine Informal Reading Inventory as a tool in examining the reading level of the pupils. As for the respondents’ reading miscues and behavioral performance, a teacher-made questionnaire was used to determine the learning areas that require intervention. The findings of the study pointed out that grade 5 pupils had difficulties on word recognition and reading comprehension. They tend to mispronounce English words and their behavior affects their performance while reading. A proposed reading program was included in this study to provide a reading remediation to learners with reading difficulties. Alongside with this initiative, teachers may conduct drill l...

European Journal of Education Studies

Rosemarie Sumalinog Gonzales

This qualitative phenomenological study was conducted to unveil the underlying issues that affect the poor reading skills of learners in Don Mariano Marcos Elementary School, Digos City, Davao del Sur. The qualitative analysis revealed that non-mastery of the elements of reading; presence of learners-at-risk; and no culture of reading affect the reading difficulty of Grade 2 learners. In fact, phonics, phonemic awareness, vocabulary, fluency, and understanding are the five independent parts that make up the reading skills of learners. Although they are frequently taught separately, these elements combine to produce strong, rich, and reliable reading abilities. Moreover, the presence of nonreaders, learners in poor health, LSENs in regular classes, learners' lack of interest in reading, a lack of orientation and training to teach reading, and learners' frequent absences from class are the causes of learners-at-risk. Furthermore, the lack of reading opportunities, a lack of reading materials, inadequate reading instruction, the absence of a reading partnership between parents, teachers, and students, a lack of teacher commitment and confidence in their ability to teach reading, improper implementation of a reading program, and a lack of monitoring of learners' progress during interventions are some of the perceived causes of a lack of a reading culture. Finally, literacy programs, individual reading recovery programs, enrichment/enhancement programs were proposed as a comprehensive reading programs to eliminate the reading problems of Grade 2 pupils in Don Mariano Marcos Elementary School.

This study aimed to test the effectiveness of an experiment with regard to developing the reading literacy among Grade I learners in the District of Candelaria. This research is quantitative in nature which utilized an experimental design where the experimental group, 99 pupisl-participants from public elementary schools in Candelaria, were selected as the study subjects and involved one group pre-test post-test design. The researcher utilized the following literacy strategies: Read-Aloud, K-W-L Charts, Graphic Organizers, Vocabulary Instruction, Writing to Learn, Structured Note-taking, and Reciprocal Teaching and engaged the pupil-participants in multiple readings of the texts over the course of eight weeks. The data gathered is analyzed using frequency distribution, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics, specifically, T-test and One Way Analysis of Variance. The findings revealed that there is a significant difference in the performance of Grade I pupils in their reading competence based on the pre-test and post-test evaluation thus, utilizing a proper intervention can be instrumental in improving pupils' reading comprehension skill. Additionally, the study found out that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of reading competence strategies before and after the activity.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Open Journal of Social Sciences

Mary Jane Tomas

Ratna Rintaningrum Scopus Author ID 35772946400

Lambert Academic Publishing

Justice Agyei Ampofo

hülya sönmez

allieu mansaray

Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal

Psychology and Education , Christian Hector G. Misanes

International Journal of Social Science and Human Research

Jesusa Pineda

Mediterranean Journal of Humanities

Cem güzeller

norly calamaya

Maria Selena Protacio

Asia Pacific Journal of Education

International journal of research publications

cristene fontanilla

Daniela Vga

SSRN Electronic Journal

Jimmy Rey Cabardo

Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies

Richard Oco

ruth luciano

Aysha Sharif

Wizcraft Journal of Language and Literature ISSN 2319-4952

Dr. Abdul Awal

Research Paper Published in ERIC sponsored by US Department of Education

Dr. Neena Dash

Adani Shabrina

United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT)

UIJRT | United International Journal for Research & Technology

Dr. Halil Taş

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Israel-Gaza War
• War in Ukraine
• US Election
• US & Canada
• UK Politics
• N. Ireland Politics
• Scotland Politics
• Wales Politics
• Latin America
• Middle East
• In Pictures
• Executive Lounge
• Technology of Business
• Women at the Helm
• Future of Business
• Science & Health
• Artificial Intelligence
• AI v the Mind
• Film & TV
• Art & Design
• Entertainment News
• Destinations
• Australia and Pacific
• Caribbean & Bermuda
• Central America
• North America
• South America
• World’s Table
• Culture & Experiences
• The SpeciaList
• Natural Wonders
• Weather & Science
• Climate Solutions
• Sustainable Business
• Green Living

Málaga tourism: 'People feel the city is collapsing'

Kike España gazes across Málaga’s Plaza de la Merced.

It’s late morning and it's still a peaceful spot at this time of day - jacaranda trees fill the square, an obelisk monument sits at its centre and on the far side is the house where Pablo Picasso was born.

But it’s the city’s tourists, many of whom are already gathering in the host of nearby cafés, who concern Kike.

“The situation is so saturated that Málaga has really reached a turning point at which people feel that the city is collapsing,” he says.

“It’s the same feeling you have when you enter a theme park,” he adds. “There is a stream of people that are consuming the city and not really inhabiting it.”

Kike is an urban planner and a local activist with the Málaga Tenants’ Union, which has been campaigning for a change in how the southern Spanish city manages tourism.

The organisation led a protest in late June in which thousands of local people took to the streets to voice their concern at the negative impact that tourism is having on their city, including pushing up housing costs, gentrification and crowds.

And it’s not just Málaga. Spaniards have been protesting throughout the summer for the same reasons in other major tourist destinations, including Barcelona, Alicante and the Canary and Balearic Islands.

In April, a group of activists on Tenerife staged a three-week hunger strike against the building of new tourist megaprojects. In Barcelona, demonstrators fired at foreign visitors with water pistols and among the slogans daubed on their banners were: “Tourism kills the city” and “Tourists go home.”

Spain first established itself as a tourist hub more than half a century ago, as northern Europeans started to flock to its coastline and islands.

Today, the industry represents about 13% of Spanish GDP and, having bounced back from the Covid-19 pandemic, it is surpassing records in terms of both revenue and arrivals.

In 2023, the country received 85 million foreign visitors and more than 90 million are expected this year, putting it close behind France, the world’s most popular tourist destination.

José Luis Zoreda, president of the Exceltur, a tourism industry association, prefers to talk about the amount of revenue the industry generates – €200bn (£171bn) in direct and indirect activity this year, he estimates – rather than the number of visitors.

He also highlights how tourism has ensured that the Spanish economy has outperformed most of its European neighbours in the wake of Covid-19.

“We have been responsible in the last few years for the most important percentage of growth of our economy,” he says. “In 2023, we were responsible for 80% of the whole GDP growth of Spain.”

So the sheer size of the tourism sector and its strong growth have driven the overall expansion of the Spanish economy.

But there is a growing belief that the cost of such success is too high and the wave of recent protests has created the sense of a tipping point. Many Spaniards are now convinced that the towns and cities they inhabit are catering more for visitors than for residents.

“Tourism was perceived as a positive economic activity that is a huge part of our GDP, but the numbers have become so huge in terms of international arrivals that we are now seeing the negative impacts, especially in cities,” says Paco Femenia-Serra, lecturer in tourism and geography at Madrid’s Complutense University.

“Tourism is competing for space and the number of people out on the streets is unbearable for many residents.”

Besides making these places less pleasant, locals say tourism has also pushed many smaller businesses out of the centre of cities. In their place have come franchise restaurants, bars and shops - and prices have risen.

But the most-cited problem is that of housing.

Spain’s biggest tourist destinations have large numbers of short-term rental properties aimed at tourists.

A recent study by El País newspaper found that several areas of Málaga had the highest proportion of Airbnb properties in Spain. A quarter of all apartments in the area around the Plaza de la Merced are dedicated to tourist rental.

Owners of apartments are able to charge more for short-term rentals than they would charge longer-term tenants and this has the effect of pushing up prices across the board. Locals say it is difficult to find an apartment for less than €1,200-1,300 per month in the centre of Málaga. With the average salary in the surrounding Andalusia region at just €1,600 per month, they are being priced out of their city.

“If the people of Málaga don’t have somewhere to live, who will provide services for the tourists?” asked Isabel Rodríguez, housing minister for Spain's governing Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE).

Speaking at a housing forum in the city in July, she continued: “Where will the waiters who serve us a glass of wine and a plate of sardines live?”

As Ms Rodríguez’s comments suggest, Spain’s political class is now starting to grapple with the tourism conundrum.

Catalonia and the Balearic Islands have already introduced a “tourist tax”, charging a sliding sum of up to €4 per person per day, depending on the type of accommodation used.

Palma de Mallorca has sought to limit numbers of arrivals by sea, with no more than three cruise liners allowed to dock at the city per day, only one of them carrying more than 5,000 passengers.

Measures are also being taken to tackle the tourist accommodation issue. This year, the regional government in Andalusia has handed town and city halls the power to introduce their own controls on short-term rentals.

In the north-east, Barcelona has already announced its intention to revoke all of the 10,000 or so tourist accommodation licences currently in circulation in 2028.

Mr Femenia-Serra describes the reining in of Spanish tourism as “a very tricky problem” given the economic weight of the industry but he believes restrictions are needed.

“If we want to talk about sustainable tourism or a lower number of tourists we should discuss limits on activity and higher restrictions and more regulation of the sector, which until now has been kind of free to act,” he says. He suggests introducing limits on the number of flights to certain destinations as a possible measure.

In Málaga, Kike España wants to see caps on rental prices and efforts to provide more housing for locals as immediate measures to counter the tourism crisis.

While he insists that he and his fellow activists are not opposed to tourism, just the way it is being managed in Spain, he says he also hopes the protests will continue.

“We are against city models that only focus on tourism,” he says. “We cannot lose all the energy and complexity and heterogeneity of our cities.”

Concerns over 'dangerous gases' at closed copper mine

'not every norwegian feels guilty but many do', venezuela's economy runs on oil - and music, 'only latte liberals care about green energy round here'.