– : Social criticism with humor
– : Rich character development and vivid descriptions of settings
by Upton Sinclair: | : is a classic example of Social Realism, as it exposes the harsh working conditions and unsanitary practices in the meatpacking industry during the early 20th century. The novel vividly portrays the struggles of immigrant workers and the deplorable conditions they faced. : While the novel is praised for its exposé of the meatpacking industry and its advocacy for labor rights, some critics argue that Sinclair’s approach at times overshadows the storytelling, making the novel feel more like a piece of propaganda. |
by Émile Zola: | : Zola’s is a quintessential Social Realist work that delves into the lives of coal miners in 19th-century France. It portrays the harsh realities of their labor, the class struggle, and the impact of industrialization on workers’ lives. : While celebrated for its powerful portrayal of working-class struggles, some critics argue that the novel’s determinism and grimness can be overwhelming, potentially reducing the complexity of the to mere products of their environment. |
by John Steinbeck: | : Steinbeck’s novel is a prime example of Social Realism during the Great Depression. It follows the Joad family, migrant workers, as they face poverty, discrimination, and economic hardship while traveling to California in search of a better life. : While highly regarded for its empathy and social critique, some critics contend that the novel’s tone of unrelenting despair and its occasional reliance on stereotypes might simplify the portrayal of the characters and their journey. |
by Theodore Dreiser: | : is a Social Realist exploration of the urbanization and materialism in early 20th-century America. It follows the life of Carrie Meeber, a young woman who moves to the city in pursuit of success, highlighting the challenges she faces. : The novel is acclaimed for its portrayal of urban life and aspiration, but it has faced criticism for its detached and naturalistic style, which some argue can result in a lack of emotional engagement with the characters. |
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Still Life with Musical Instruments, Books, and Sculpture ( c 1650) by Evaristo Baschenis. Courtesy Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam
So-called ‘classical’ music was as revolutionary as the modern novel in its storytelling, harmony and depth.
by Joel Sandelson + BIO
Compare these two pieces. First, one of Henry Purcell’s fantasias for viols (1680). A short figure is imitated between voices, summoning a detailed web of melancholy counterpoint. The idea is spun out in elaborate developments: upside down, the entries piling up closer together, the tail extended into a sequence. The music contorts itself into harmonic paradoxes and clashes, perhaps reminiscent of the wit and double meanings of poetry by those other 17th-century Englishmen, John Donne and Andrew Marvell. This is music of great beauty and sophistication, but where does the piece as a whole take us? It falls clearly enough into large-scale sections (beginning at 1:38, 2:30 and 3:15) differentiated by a new character, tempo and theme. But their sequence feels additive rather than cumulative, with little sense of an overall narrative arc. To us modern listeners, the effect is something like looking at a richly embroidered tapestry, as if each line of counterpoint were a thread in a seamless, two-dimensional foreground.
Now try the first movement of Haydn’s 47th symphony (1774). Everything about it sounds in motion , from the level of each phrase to the piece as a whole – more like telling a story than seeing a static object from multiple angles. Each phrase is clearly directional, carefully proportioned, and distinct from its neighbours. Like a tour of the rooms and gardens of a rococo palace, the piece as a whole has a strongly differentiated beginning, middle and end: setting off, passing through varied surroundings, and returning to an altered version of where we began (from 4:16) with the benefit of experience. (Both halves of the movement are themselves repeated – if you want to hear it all through once, listen from 1:24 to 5:26). The music seems to evoke not just linear time but something like spatial depth; events in the musical foreground whose succession feels compelled by a purposeful underlying structure.
What changed in this century or so between Purcell and Haydn? Three crucial innovations of musical composition are part of the story. One is a much greater variety of texture – the surface events and gestures of the music. Another is a more unified, integrated approach to overall structure, based on large-scale repetition and resolution. The last is a new system of harmony that was able to create a sense of proximity and distance, foreground and depth, over extended periods of time. I want to suggest some parallels between this 18th-century musical lingua franca and a familiar device from another medium: modern realist prose, which emerged through the 17th and 18th centuries – just when these musical conventions took shape.
W e habitually associate literary realism with things like down-to-earth subject matter, plausible detail and convincing chronology. For the ancients, though, realism had just the opposite meaning. Aristotle argued that art should transcend the mass of incidental details around us and deal with the more important reality of universals. On this view, art imitates reality not by directly copying things around us, but by somehow reflecting our broad experience of reality through its modes of representation. But in the wake of the empiricist philosophy and science of the 1600s and 1700s, this idea was turned on its head: what was ‘realistic’ was now the flux of particulars. This updated notion of realism found classic expression in the novel – novels that depicted particular people having particular experiences at particular times and places. For the literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin, writing in the 1930s, the quintessential feature of the modern novel was ‘heteroglossia’: a riotous mixture of voices, characters and styles, which undermines the claim to authority of any one of them. And this opens up a tempting musical parallel.
In the early decades of the 18th century, just as the first modern novels were gaining purchase among a new reading public, a new kind of opera from Naples was sweeping Europe. It was a comic style later called opera buffa , distinguished from its forebears by its depiction of multiple character types. Opera seria (and its French equivalent, tragédie lyrique ), to which buffa was a democratic alternative, had been based principally on classical subjects featuring characters of noble or mythological origin. It was structurally more static, too: each seria aria froze the forward motion of the plot and expressed the singing character’s particular passion at that moment, through highly conventionalised means. In the new comic style, contrasting styles, textures and topics jostled together in close proximity; this dazzling variety was imported from the opera house into instrumental music by mid-century galant composers like Giovanni Battista Sammartini and Johann Stamitz.
In his dialogue Rameau ’ s Nephew (1805), Denis Diderot has his title character both advocate and imitate the disjointed discourse of the modern style. ‘We need exclamations, interjections, suspensions, interruptions, affirmations, and negations,’ he says. ‘No more witticisms, epigrams, neat thoughts – they are too unlike nature.’ Whereas a string of arias in a Handel opera seria (or a sequence of dance movements in a baroque suite) each inhabit a singular affect and isolated vantage point, an ensemble finale in a comic opera or a symphony movement of the later 18th century give us a carnival of distinct characters.
There are few consistent spatial or temporal relationships, and little sense of realistic cause and effect
So one thing in common between novels and certain musical genres of the period is a palimpsest of voices and styles, a seething mass of surface particulars. But they are just that – a surface. I want to turn to a more profound theory of realism to recognise isomorphisms between the arts on a more significant level.
In her book Realism and Consensus in the English Novel (1983), Elizabeth Deeds Ermarth argues that a central preoccupation of realist art in general, both in literature and painting, is the projection of a neutral, communal sense of time and space. Premodern narratives, in her account, were typically structured around separate, unreconciled points of view. (Battle scenes in the Iliad , for instance, describe one hero attacking and then another falling, rather than the fight between them.) Each character has a destiny tied to the centre of the universe. Things gain their significance in relation to the divine order, not to each other. There are few consistent spatial or temporal relationships, and little sense of realistic cause and effect.
The later achievement, according to Ermarth, was to create a point of view that was anonymous, arbitrary and partial, but at the same time a unifying force: an ‘energy source everywhere in the work’ that serves to ‘homogenise the medium’. A central device of the realism of the 18th and 19th centuries was the invisible narrator. This all-knowing voice creates the illusion of a shared, quantifiable reality, allowing writers to unify huge volumes of detail through naturalistic vectors of space and time. And the sense of unity is not just spatial and temporal, but psychological. When we freely move between the interior thoughts of two characters in a novel by George Eliot or Dickens, we gain insight into their minds through the unifying consciousness of the narrator.
How might music of the same period reflect these preoccupations? To make the connection, we have to look at two fundamental features of the Enlightenment’s musical language: form and harmony.
W riting to his father from Paris in 1778, Mozart described the success of his latest symphony:
[J]ust in the middle of the allegro a passage occurred which I felt sure must please, and there was a burst of applause; but as I knew at the time I wrote it what effect it was sure to produce, I brought it in once more at the close.
What’s new here is not just the notion of a composer tailoring his music to the tastes of a public concert audience (though new it was). A more subtle emphasis in his words is upon the very idea of music’s sequential disposition.
In his book Bach ’ s Cycle, Mozart ’ s Arrow (2007), Karol Berger argues that an important shift in musical temporality took place between his two titular composers: a static, ‘eternal Now’, evoking the timelessness of the divine, giving way to a dynamic and goal-directed flow of time. In the middle of listening to one of Bach’s fugues , it’s actually quite hard to locate ourselves in the overall structure. Bach is concerned with the potential for development of his fugue subject (heard alone at the beginning) – a catalogue of inventions that could take place in almost any order. On the other hand, once music’s specific sequential ordering was felt to be significant, a piece could be understood as in some way analogous to a story. Later 18th-century listeners therefore came to hear music in explicitly narrative terms.
For an early biographer of Haydn, one of the composer’s symphonies brought to mind a story of considerable complexity about man setting sail for America. His account freely mixes musical detail with narrative, each influencing the other:
At this point, the opening theme of the Symphony returns. But soon the sea begins to grow rough, the sky darkens and a fearful tempest advances with a clashing of key-signatures and a quickening of the tempo. Aboard the ship all is wild disorder. The cries of the sailors, the pounding of the waves, the howling of the gale whip up the melody from chromatic to pathetic.
One thing in particular allows the musical structures of Mozart and Haydn to afford a sense of narrative, and it’s something so obvious that it usually goes unmentioned. Repetition of one kind or another is endemic to most music as a basic tool of coherence – like the close-knit imitation between voices in that Purcell we began with. But larger-scale formal repetition, which involves a significant passage of music repeating on a broad, structural level (perhaps in some kind of ‘resolving’ way the second time, after a contrasting middle) is a higher-order, emergent feature: it depends on a surface varied enough to enable larger structures to stand out in relief. In itself, this was nothing new; just think of the refrains of popular songs since time immemorial. But over the long 18th century, it becomes a virtual sine qua non across all genres, and not just when motivated by a verbal text.
Most of this music seems to lack endings of any real force, given the low degree of internal tension to resolve
Vivaldi’s concerto movements, for instance, alternate between an orchestral ritornello (‘return’) in various related keys, and more exploratory episodes for the soloist. Almost every movement of Beethoven’s nine symphonies, composed between 1800 and 1824, involves a decisive structural return: from the revolutionary quest of the Eroica symphony’s first movement to the humble clockwork-driven intermezzo of the eighth. A reprise might be as modest as in many of Domenico Scarlatti’s three-minute sonatas: two halves, each repeated, the second shuffling around some earlier ideas and sealed with a pithy ‘end rhyme’ with the first half. And even the most capricious and whimsical sorts of pieces rely on it. C P E Bach’s fantasias for keyboard, impulsive expressions of inner sensibility, and Schubert’s impromptus, notated records of the composer’s far-reaching improvisation at the piano, all repeat long passages.
It might seem as though the very idea of literal reprise is so basic as to be inevitable, but it’s actually a striking rarity in music before the later 17th century. A cantata by Carissimi or Schütz, or an instrumental piece by Marini or Sweelinck (all of the early to mid-1600s) fall into clear sectional structures, but without a sense of overall repetition. The keyboard virtuoso Frescobaldi even prefaced his first book of toccatas (1615) with permission for the performer to start and end each piece wherever desired, conceiving of the music more as a compendium of effects and affects than an integrated plot to be followed from start to finish.
Unity might be achieved through other means: a repeating but developmental formula like a ground bass , or a pre-existing popular tune or chorale melody unfolding slowly in one voice. Notice, too, how most of this music seems to lack endings of any real force, given the low degree of internal tension to resolve. (By contrast, fast-forward a century and a half to Beethoven’s famously long and tautologous endings : they sound like absolutely necessary outcomes of what precedes them. Like a large aircraft needing a long runway to slow down, the ferocious forward momentum of the music needs a proportionately satisfying grounding.) Heard through ears trained by 18th-century conventions, this earlier music can sound somewhat open-ended or structurally ‘flat’ – perhaps akin to the experience of reading certain pre-realist literature. In his great study Mimesis (1946), Erich Auerbach writes that medieval prose romances ‘string independent pictures together like beads’, each separated by blank intervals of time and no sense of historical progression. In medieval and other pre-perspectival painting, too, each object or figure exists in its own foreground, with no overall vantage point to create a single spatial continuum.
A musical reprise has an inherent doubleness, a simultaneous past and present. It functions as an index of time elapsed and distance travelled. An important feature of realist narrators is a similar temporal doubleness: a present-tense narration of past events arranged in a clear sequence, giving the story a forward-straining direction. (This may have a philosophical provenance: in early modern thought, especially Locke and Hume, the relationship between memory and present awareness becomes an increasingly important determiner of personal identity.)
A vivid example of this convention in its earliest, most vulnerable phase is Samuel Richardson’s Pamela (1740). Much of the story is told through a series of letters from the maidservant heroine, some written just moments after the events they describe. The story constantly threatens to catch up with the telling. Writing to her parents to complain of untoward comments by her master, she quickly signs off, later explaining: ‘I broke off abruptly my last letter; for I feared he was coming; and so it happened.’ Laurence Sterne’s novels take as their subject the possibility of linear storytelling itself: an autobiography that can’t decide on its own starting point and barely gets beyond age two and a half ( Tristram Shandy , 1759-67) and a travelogue of a journey through France and Italy with no clear purpose and the destination never reached ( A Sentimental Journey , 1768). The desire to include incidental details undermines the plot, because the sheer weight of detail stalls the narrative’s forward motion. But Sterne equally satirises its opposite, the idea of pure forward motion without pausing to take in anything on the way. Vowing to the reader to proceed at last with fewer digressions, Shandy draws literal ‘story lines’ that purport to illustrate the motion of his plot. The absurdity is clear: what would be the point of a story told in a straight line? How would it even be possible? Music and literature seem to discover the possibility of integrated, linear storytelling at almost the same time. To us, these techniques are second nature; back then, there were anxieties over it, as one can have only over something in its precarious infancy.
Plot lines in Tristram Shandy (1759-67) by Laurence Sterne. Courtesy the British Library
W e can find parallels that run just as deep in music’s harmonic dimension. Ermarth relates the narrative techniques of modern prose to the linear perspective first achieved in Renaissance painting: both represent time and space in communal, quasi-objective ways (the ‘consensus’ of her title). In perspectival art, all objects in a picture are situated in relation to a vanishing point. The picture plane itself intercepts imaginary lines that radiate from each object and converge on the viewer’s eyes, a simulation of the three-dimensional space that we perceive in the world. I want to suggest that the powerful engine of 18th-century tonality evokes something like this sense of spatial depth.
Earlier music relied in various ways on a creaking and inconsistent modal system. A mode (in this sense) is a scale made up of particular patterns of intervals. Each mode has a distinctive harmonic colour, and each tends to be associated with other musical traits, like recurring melodic formulas and characteristic emotions. As far back as the Republic , Plato banishes the ‘indolent’ Lydian from his ideal state but retains the ‘warlike’ Dorian. (The ancient Greek modes, it should be said, were quite different to later systems.) There was frequent ambiguity about the status of the modes: theorists in the 1500s and 1600s disputed their importance or even existence, seeing counterpoint as fundamental, and the modes merely as a system of classification. By the early 18th century, there were effectively only two possible modes left: our modern major and minor. This was a dramatic simplification that unlocked a great expansion. The energies of tonality – something like a gravitational or magnetic force between notes, chords or keys – could now operate on a much grander scale.
Realist narrative relies on an accretion of insignificant details like this
Listen to this dance music by Jean-Baptiste Lully for Molière’s comedy Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme (1670). The music is full of familiar gestures and cadences – the gravitational forces of tonality – but without moving away from the home key for long enough to escape its influence. We could say that the music temporarily rests ‘on’ other closely related keys, rather than moving ‘into’ them. Now try this concerto grosso by Corelli from just two decades later. The music now feels like it moves decisively ‘into’ nearby keys. Those local cadences in the Lully are stretched out over longer spans of time in the Corelli, spans that are padded out and given a phenomenological depth by the whirling, repetitive figurations for the soloists. Rather than dwelling on the bejewelled surface of a distinctive mode for its duration, music now began to move systematically between different transpositions of its starting key: what we call modulation. The power of tonal harmony is its recursion. It moves in the same way in its surface gestures as on a higher level.
Eighteenth-century pieces dramatise this potential for longer-range harmonic motion. A movement of a Vivaldi concerto or Haydn sonata stages a harmonic journey away from a tonic key to a closely related one, through more distant regions, before a satisfying homecoming. Each of these modulations requires an imaginary sort of ‘effort’, typically by the suggestion of a delicately weighted sequence of fifths above each new key. We have seen how large-scale repetition can suggest something like temporal depth. Could the tension we hear in a tonal piece between these two related ‘angles’ – the key we are in at a given moment and the overall tonic – produce something like a spatial equivalent?
Another way of looking at this is to say that harmonic structure becomes fundamentally relational, not absolute. Critics have detected just the same quality in the realist prose that flowered in the next century. Commenting on Flaubert’s description of a living room, Roland Barthes suggests that the piano might indicate the bourgeois standing of its owner and the boxes and crates a sign of messiness or decline of the household – but the barometer is just there , ‘neither incongruous nor significant’. Realist narrative relies on an accretion of insignificant details like this. These details are not symbolic or allegorical, alive with meaningful resonances; their only purpose is to evoke the texture of reality.
Characters in premodern literature are bundles of allegorical attributes, all their qualities open to view at all times. In John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim ’ s Progress (1678-84) their very names announce who they really are: Christian, Hypocrisy, Goodwill. In later novels, on the other hand, when we meet a new character, they could be just about anyone. We discover who they are by accompanying them on a journey of experience through time and space. And so in music: a modern key doesn’t have any of the unique characteristics or flavours of one of the older modes – though some of these characteristics did survive through convention. All of them – any major or minor scale – have the same internal structure. What matters is how you get from one to another.
In philosophy from René Descartes onwards, matter is thought to be inert extension, devoid of meaning and spirit. Nature is homogeneous, to be measured with the uniform tools of geometry and clock time. This is the intellectual background to linear perspective and the techniques of literary realism. They go hand in hand with the new mechanical philosophy; they all express the modern impulse to rationalise. Erwin Panofsky, in a discussion of Italian Renaissance painting, suggests that linear perspective ‘seems to reduce the divine to a mere subject matter for human consciousness’. The musical techniques explored above play their own part in this story. A movement of an 18th-century mass also rephrases religious truths in ways comprehensible to the earthly. The liturgy is now arrayed along tonality’s rationalising, perspectival grid. Perhaps we, the listeners, replace God as the ideal vantage point of the music.
R evolutions in art don’t take place overnight, and many aspects of 18th-century music were caught between older and newer conceptions. Already present in J S Bach’s music , for instance, are the powerful forces of goal-directed tonality that he derived from the Italian concerto style, even though (as Berger argues) Bach is best thought of as a late representative of the older model of musical time. And much of the idiosyncratic music of the 1600s shows features in outline that would become more important in the next century. One of the first operas, Monteverdi’s L’Orfeo of 1607, contains (appropriately enough for a story about a return from the Underworld) a ritornello punctuating its recitative-driven scenes. Each repetition summons us over and over again to Euridice’s fatal look back.
If we look at later 19th-century music, these conventions are as enduring – and as unquestioned – as their counterparts in literature and painting. The young Richard Strauss’s Don Juan (1889) is a virtuosic rendering in music of the seducer’s tale. The Don Juan legend itself has no literal large-scale repetitions. So why does Strauss feel the need to write a long, balancing reprise of the opening music (starting at 14:23) when there can be no direct literary justification? Perhaps he felt it necessary in order to achieve a ‘purely musical’ coherence, as a novel or painting achieves for itself by different means. Tellingly, the composer’s own written programme for the piece, which matches moments in the music to the story, falls silent during the long repetition – as if the passage were as integral but almost as unremarkable as the proscenium arch of a theatre or the canvas of a painting.
The textbooks call the late 18th century ’s music the ‘Classical’ era. In some respects, it’s an unfortunate label, giving a serene, abstract (and just plain ‘old’) quality to music that we could hear as endlessly contemporary and loaded with worldly significance. But perhaps there is a sense in which this music can be thought of as a ‘classical’, or perhaps a ‘classic’, style. The devices of literary realism, too, became classic: powerful but invisible conventions that pass themselves off as nature.
Political philosophy
C L R James and America
The brilliant Trinidadian thinker is remembered as an admirer of the US but he also warned of its dark political future
Harvey Neptune
Falling for suburbia
Modernists and historians alike loathed the millions of new houses built in interwar Britain. But their owners loved them
Michael Gilson
Thinkers and theories
Rawls the redeemer
For John Rawls, liberalism was more than a political project: it is the best way to fashion a life that is worthy of happiness
Alexandre Lefebvre
Anthropology
Your body is an archive
If human knowledge can disappear so easily, why have so many cultural practices survived without written records?
Helena Miton
Seeing plants anew
The stunningly complex behaviour of plants has led to a new way of thinking about our world: plant philosophy
Stella Sandford
Knowledge is often a matter of discovery. But when the nature of an enquiry itself is at question, it is an act of creation
Céline Henne
It’s 2024 and fantasy author George R.R. Martin has officially spent 12 years working on The Winds of Winter , the long-awaited sixth installment in the series that inspired the HBO hit Game of Thrones . With no release date in sight, one tech-savvy fan decided to write the story himself, or rather, he asked ChatGPT to write it for him. Prompted to develop outlines for each chapter, and then turn those outlines into prose, the AI churned out a 683,276-word tome of surprising quality.
Surprising because although this “fan-made” version of Winds of Winter failed to live up to the standards of Martin’s work, it did contain the unexpected twists and turns that made his fantasy epic so successful. Among the book’s flabbergasted readers was Martin, who upon learning of its existence not only took legal action against the fan but also ChatGPT’s developer, OpenAI.
Joining the ranks of other bestselling authors such as John Grisham and Jonathan Franzen, Martin’s ongoing war with large language models — which were trained on their writing, among countless other sources — raises an important question about the creative capabilities of machine learning. Anyone who has used AI programs like ChatGPT in recent months knows they are great at summarizing textbooks and writing boilerplate cover letters, but can they also produce the kind of writing that moves us and speaks to our souls?
Journalist Vauhini Vara thinks the answer is yes. In an article titled “Confessions of a Viral AI Writer,” she relates how in 2020 OpenAI granted her early access to GPT-3. Defining creative writing mainly as “waiting for the right word,” she suspected that generative AI, with its instantaneous access to every noun and adjective in the English dictionary, could be a helpful tool, especially for topics she struggled to write about.
One of these topics — the topic, really — was the death of Vara’s older sister, who was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer while still in high school. Initially, GPT-3’s attempts at writing a story based on this premise were unsatisfactory. The AI would swap her sister’s real-world fate with a miraculous recovery or, in drafts where her death was acknowledged, turn Vara into a long-distance runner racing for charity. It wasn’t until she shifted to a more collaborative writing process, with GPT-3 learning from and adapting to her own inputs, that it managed to produce a line of text that genuinely touched her:
We were driving home from Clarke Beach, and we were stopped at a red light, and she took my hand and held it. This is the hand she held: the hand I write with, the hand I am writing this with.
Although ChatGPT has been programmed to write in a bland, explanatory way, it can learn to mimic other voices provided it has enough training data.
“I think there is a misconception that large language models like ChatGPT are not very good at writing in a lyrical, literary prose style,” author Sean Michaels tells Big Think after being pointed to Vara’s article. “In fact, they can do it easily and quite well, just like all the image-generating software can do things like making photos in the styles of Wes Anderson or David Lynch.”
For his novel Do You Remember Being Born , in which a poet is approached by a tech company to co-author a collection of poems with their AI, Michaels created a custom version of ChatGPT he called “Moorebot,” which through training learned to write in the style of real-world poet Marianne Moore, further blurring the distinction between human and machine.
Although some writers oppose the rise of AI out of concern for their employability, others have embedded the debate in an older, broader dialogue on the meaning and purpose of art. The Oscar-winning screenwriter Charlie Kaufman, who writes in a style so idiosyncratic critics coined the phrase “Kaufmanesque” to describe it, has been perhaps most vocal about his personal distaste of machine learning. Looking beyond the standard definition of creativity — creating something new and original — Kaufman describes art as any form of expression that establishes an emotional connection between people.
“Say who you are,” he said in a BAFTA lecture that foreshadowed comments made during the 2023 SAG strikes . “Really say it, in your life and in your work. Tell someone out there — someone who is lost, someone not yet born, someone who won’t be born for 500 years. Your writing will be a record of your time. It can’t help but be. But if you’re honest, you will help that person be less lonely in their world.”
Even if AI were capable of writing something emotional or profound, which Vara and Michaels claim it can, Kaufman would refuse to recognize this as art because it cannot establish a link between reader and author. “If I read a poem,” he recently said in a statement on AI , “and that poem moves me, I am in love with the person who wrote it. I can’t be in love with a computer program. I can’t, because it isn’t anything.”
Kaufman’s sentiment should be assessed alongside that of Michaels who, through his work with AI, has reached a different conclusion: Human creativity is less special than we want to believe. He explains:
“Imagine I write, ‘The moon looked like a slice of lemon.’ You read it and think, ‘That’s an interesting image.’ But when AI does it, you think, ‘Well, is that interesting? Because it just seems completely random.’ Human beings have this capacity to make meaning from things and find connections where there are none or where there is no intention behind them. I found it provocative not just that AI could come up with lines I found beautiful or strange or interesting, but also that it got me wondering if the AI was doing something successfully as a writer or if I was doing something successfully as a reader.”
As for whether or not AI is capable of ‘true’ creativity:
“It’s true human art draws on memories, bodies, dreams, and arbitrary but somehow meaningful linkages between abstract, surreal thoughts. None of those things are things ChatGPT has. At least not in a literal way. But then again, there is something strange about the way fiction is about pretended bodies, pretended dreams, pretended lived experiences. If you read a modern story about, say, a 17th-century Dutch merchant, that’s not based on anybody’s real-life experience as a 17th-century merchant. Similarly, because these large language models don’t have what we have, that doesn’t mean that their work has none of the qualities that ours does. It’s not that easy.”
According to Michaels, increased usage of large language models is expected to lead “to a certain convergence of styles, with writing becoming less diverse and more monolithic as we use the same algorithms.”
Florent Vinchon, a PhD student at Université Paris Cité studying the creative skills of generative AI, suggests that — although it is still too soon to say with certainty — machine learning “might have the same impact on writing as photography had on painting,” a view shared by other experts in the field. Just as the camera pushed painters from realism to abstraction, spawning artistic movements that concerned themselves with how we perceive rather than what , AI could inspire new generations of authors to experiment with their writing.
Since programs like ChatGPT allow anyone to produce competent prose, the novels and novellas of tomorrow may be deliberately less polished, riddled with grammatical errors and linguistic idiosyncrasies that point to the limits of the human brain and the uniqueness of the individual perspective. Far from a threat to the survival of creative writing or human creativity in general, AI, like the innovative technologies that came before it, may become a force of change and a source of inspiration.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Realism (REEL-iz-um), or literary realism, is an era of literary technique in which authors described things as they are without embellishment or fantastical plots. Works of literary realism shun flowery language, exotic settings and characters, and epic stories of love and heroism. Instead, they focus on everyday lives and people in ordinary times and places.
Table of Contents. The term "realism" originates from the Latin word "realis," meaning "real.". In philosophy and the arts, realism denotes a movement or approach characterized by an emphasis on depicting things as they are, without idealization or distortion. Meaning in Philosophy: In philosophy, realism posits that objects exist ...
Definition of Realism. Realism is a movement in art and literature that began in the 19th century as a shift against the exotic and poetic conventions of Romanticism.Literary realism allowed for a new form of writing in which authors represented reality by portraying everyday experiences of relatable and complex characters, as they are in real life Literary realism depicts works with relatable ...
Essays and criticism on Realism - Critical Essays. ... In addition to literature, Realism has exerted a profound and widespread impact on many aspects of twentieth-century thought, including ...
Literary realism is a literary genre, part of the broader realism in arts, that attempts to represent subject-matter truthfully, avoiding speculative fiction and supernatural elements. ... Crane was primarily a journalist who also wrote fiction, essays, poetry, and plays. Crane saw life at its rawest, in slums and on battlefields.
Source: Liz Brent, Critical Essay on Realism, in Literary Movements for Students, The Gale Group, 2003. Cite this page as follows: "Realism - Realist Movement in Theater and Drama."
The notion of realism, in its development as a term of literary criticism, is in origin a genre concept. "Realistic" writing is, in that sense, essentially writing that deals with "low" rather than "high" topics, with the doings of ordinary people leading everyday lives, rather than with the acts of gods, princes, or nobles; and deals with them in a "low" style, a style close ...
Introduction. Variously defined as distinct philosophical approaches, complementary aesthetic strategies, or broad literary movements, realism and naturalism emerged as the dominant categories applied to American fiction of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Included under the broad umbrella of realism are a diverse set of authors ...
Realism in literature is a pivotal literary movement that emerged in the mid-19th century and has since left an indelible mark on contemporary writing. ... The essays in this special issue reject the reflex to prejudge realist art and expand the category to include the realisms of late-Victorian theater, postcolonial fiction from African ...
17. Realism Introduction. Amy Berke; Jordan Cofer; and Doug Davis. After the Civil War and toward the end of the nineteenth century, America experienced significant change. With the closing of the Western frontier and increasing urbanization and industrialization, and with the completion of the First Transcontinental Railroad and the advent of ...
Realism in American literature is a style of fiction writing influenced by the French in which life is described with strict fidelity to fact and detail. Naturalism, on the other hand is a sub-genre of American which involves the character/ characters' singular struggle against the forces of war, nature and the like.
This essay about realism in American literature explores its departure from romantic ideals, focusing on the everyday experiences of ordinary people with detailed authenticity. Realism emerged in response to societal changes post-Civil War, emphasizing character over plot and delving into psychological intricacies. Authors like Henry James and ...
American Realism: A Grammar of Motives. Criticism: Background And Sources. The Rise of Realism 1871-1891. The American Background. William Dean Howells and the Roots of Realist Taste. Criticism ...
At the most elementary level, realism may be equated with verisimilitude or the approximation of truth. A mimetic artist, the literary realist claims to mirror or represent the world as it objectively appears. Naturalism may be given a trio of thumbnail definitions: pessimistic determinism, stark realism, and realism plus Darwin. Subjects.
Originally published in the 1930s, these essays on realism, expressionism, and modernism in literature present Lukacs's side of the controversy among Marxist...
Realism began as a literary movement in response to and as a departure from the idealism of the Romantic period. Realism emerged in literature in the second half of the nineteenth century, most predominantly in novels. ... Again, Dickens will be the main focus, with his Pickwick Papers having sold 40,000 copies per issue at the time Part 15 ...
This essay about realism in literature, exploring its emergence, defining characteristics, and notable examples. Realism, born in response to the romanticism of the 19th century, focuses on portraying everyday life and ordinary people without romantic idealization. It emphasizes relatable characters, social critique, and an objective portrayal ...
A break from Romanticism, Realism is any effort to portray life as it truly is. In the middle of the 19th century, kings and queens, warriors and knights, demonic cats, ghosts, sea creatures, and monsters gave way to farmers, merchants, lawyers, laborers, and bakers. Realism in literature was part of a wider movement in the arts to focus on ...
Realism: The literary movement that aims to represent everyday life and society as truthfully and accurately as possible, a foundational aspect of Social Realist literature. Social Critique: The examination and analysis of societal issues, often with the aim of raising awareness and advocating for change, a central purpose of Social Realist ...
The devices of literary realism, too, became classic: powerful but invisible conventions that pass themselves off as nature. Music Stories and literature Beauty and aesthetics. 22 July 2024. So-called 'classical' music was as revolutionary as the modern novel in its storytelling, harmony and depth.
One of these topics — the topic, really — was the death of Vara's older sister, who was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer while still in high school.Initially, GPT-3's attempts at ...